Jump to content

Dividend vs investment


maximus1987/lou99

Recommended Posts

How do wireless companies decide the split between dividends and investments?

As a reference, TDS/USM said:

On its Q2 earnings call, TDS' executives outlined a 75%-25% split in deploying capital; 75% would go towards investments in the business, both organic and inorganic, and the remaining 25% would be returned to shareholders, via both buybacks and dividends

http://m.seekingalpha.com/article/1605492

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do wireless companies decide the split between dividends and investments?

 

They spin the wheel of fortune, read tea leaves, or rely on voodoo.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A company will invest their money if they believe there is opportunity to grow the company and/or expand their market share.

 

A company will return money to investors via buybacks and/or dividends if they have no better use for the money and/or shareholders expect periodic income from their investment (stock) in the company.

 

Sprint has had terrible losses of money over the past ~7 years, so they distribute no dividends. Lots of their (borrowed) money go towards investment, such as Network Vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They spin the wheel of fortune, read tea leaves, or rely on voodoo.

 

AJ

Frankly, I've always found voodoo to be the most inexact of the methods of the science of fortune telling. A direct binary stream of the universe works much better. Ah, if only Fate was as easily parsed as XML...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a balance between firm growth and ownership loyalty. 

 

One hand, a firm needs to keep growing in an efficient and effective manner to spur revenue growth.

 

However, depending on the stockholders, return of equity is required in one way or the other (i.e., dividends, stock splits or stock price growth).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they said :-) Plus the ownership structure of the company plays a part, or more accurately if a significant number of shares are held by rich individuals who wish to make a quick buck. If a company is basically proffitable but has previously been over valued and or is seeing it's share price drop like a hoores droors then there is an incentive for 'vultures' to buy a big enough stake in the company to have sway and force the company to distribute any 'warchest' and have the company borrow and return all that to the shareholders. Dell and Apple are recent examples. The short term attraction drives up the price long enough for the original vulture to sell their shares and make off with the bounty leaving a house of cards behind them.

IBM have been returning value for more conventional reasons mentioned above plus there is a hint of CEO pride, they want a stock split. It's basically some kind of tradition where they get a cookie or something as a reward. When the stock gets so high in price they split each share and reissue so the price per share is more manageable, although I think Buffets company BH run two issues at once with one being a silly price and another more manageable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...although I think Buffets company BH run two issues at once with one being a silly price and another more manageable.

 

Yeah, BRK.A is down $679 already today.  It must be a penny stock by now.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet Warren is sorting through his LP's right now for a quick garage sale so he can make rent ;-).

 

He will definitely have to cut back on his trips to Dairy Queen for a Blizzard.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Luckily, that hasn't arisen in my area where I am, aside from having B14 (well, ALL of AT&T signal) not work at all in Coosa county, Alabama. I wish there was a service for first responders that would go to ANY available carrier, provider, etc..and in the absolute worst case scenario, would give us service. I've been on an ambulance, trying to find an address, and my driver actually had to pull over and we pulled out a map book and tried to find the road using the "old fashioned way".. and that takes valuable time away that sometimes may be vital to someone surviving. BUT, I will say that I've only seen that in Coosa county... both my Tmo and AT&T phones had zero service and I couldn't get GPS, and neither could my driver (VZW service). Maybe satellite will help with that in those times where that occurs.. but that's an extreme example.     Edit to add: Let me add some context to this.. Coosa county isn't regular coverage area for my job.. so it's not a regular thing that we are dispatched to Coosa county.. and actually, there's been a change and that county now has it's own ambulance service that operates.. so the only time we might receive a request is if it's a multiple casualty scenario, or it's a transfer going home from our contracted hospital.  The way that reads above, it may seem like we are just out without some sort of GPS gadget to direct us on where to go, but for the most part, we know our coverage area pretty well. Dispatch can also give us cross streets for reference inside our coverage area (and our home county). Coosa just isn't a regular area for my job to run in. 
    • "Priority" doesn't mean "exclusivity."  When emergency services don't need B14, AT&T can use it for everyone else.  The trade-off is that when it is needed for emergency services, they not only get all of B14, but they have also arranged for priority on the rest of the AT&T network as well.  Beats having spectrum sitting unused most of the time and then not having enough when disaster strikes, as it could be without a partnership with a wireless company like AT&T. - Trip
    • I've wondered if being on the first responder plan has the priority over other 'regular' lines in the same way firstnet does (or, supposed to do with B14...I've seen normal customers on AT&T hit B14 so it's not {specifically} for Firstnet only)...  
    • T-Mobile prices people pay are all over the map. The free lines are key, so take them if ever offered again.  Your priority level would be a key factor for your price.  Only T-Mobile would know the average prices people pay.  Samsung has been offering very good deals at time of new model introductions so I have gone that route for factory unlocked, which allows me to also have a Verizon priority MVNO for when T-Mobile signal fails or I manually override.
    • I also wanted to post a speed test result.. I only do these once in a while from my home area because we are gonna be the last to see changes, like load balancing.  Right now they are digging all over the place for fiber installs, so I'm not sure what the hold-up is on making the upload speed a little more in-line with download speeds, but here is the most recent from my area:   https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10133670525
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...