Jump to content

Asus Nexus tablet confirmed by sources, launching as early as May


pyroscott

Recommended Posts

Although it wasn't confirmed by Google or Asus, sources for Digitimes have revealed that Asus will build the rumored 7 inch Nexus tablet aimed squarely at the budget market currently dominated by Kindle Fire.

 

Among potential partners, HTC had strong design capability but insisted on directing development of the co-brand model and was unwilling to develop a low-price model to impair its brand image, while Acer did not have in-house R&D capability, the sources indicated. Google finally selected Asustek because of its ODM capability and good product quality, the sources claimed.

 

Even though the Xoom didn't really blow any doors off when it was released, the partnership on this tablet can put Asus even further "on the map" as an Android tablet manufacturer. The honeycomb platform was good for advancing Android tablets, but people want their phone and tablet on the same operating system. It is a pain to even switch off between Sense and Touchwiz, let alone Gingerbread and Honeycomb. The combination of a budget-friendly tablet and premium construction from Asus should sell in mass and could steal away iPad customers on a budget, where the Kindle Fire has failed thanks to some features absent from the Fire. Now we just need some leaks on the specs.

 

Source http://www.digitimes...20308PD215.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking forward to seeing what this Google tablet will do. The initial specs look promising, but I'm waiting to see what sort of memory it will have and final form factor. Although I think I would prefer a 10" Google tablet, for the right price I my have to take this one for a test drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they hit the $200 price point, and allow SD memory expansion, you really can't go wrong with this tablet. I am also likely to wait for the 10 inch tablet that is rumored to be following this but if I can unload my galaxy tab, I will definitely buy this tablet.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. I saw rumors that it may go to cloud storage, but if it comes with expandable memory that may pursuade me even more.

 

Cloud storage....ha talk about a slow system...esp on our network...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an unconfirmed rumor. ASUS has cancelled the MeMo tablet to concentrate on Googles pad. The "rumored" price point my be $149 but may lose the quad-core. Hmm?

 

If it keeps going like that, we might as well arrive at free in the end. The latest tip about the Nexus tablet also speculates that the Asus MeMo 370T, that adorable $249 7" Android slate with Tegra 3 we expected to be detailed at MWC, has instead been terminated, when Asus got picked by Google to produce its poster kid slate. Unfortunately the Tegra 3 bit seems to be out as well, which might explain the lowered price.

 

http://www.phonearen...-for-it_id28153

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they put the right dual core processor in there, nobody will miss the quad core. That would be crazy, $150 for a nexus tablet. I thought $200 was pushing the limits on the balance of performance and price.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it may seem counterintuitive, but quad core devices are expected to be more battery efficient than dual core.

 

Robert

 

Posted via Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't some dual-cores using the new 28 pin and isn't the tegra 3 on the old standard? if so, I think the 28 pin would be more energy efficient at least from what I read. Have to be careful, don't want 4ringsnbr upset at my lack of knowledge again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I read that tegra 3 was more efficient that dual core with helper core. If that is true, quad is king of efficiency. But does it matter that much in a tablet? There is a lot more room for a big battery than a phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I read that tegra 3 was more efficient that dual core with helper core. If that is true, quad is king of efficiency. But does it matter that much in a tablet? There is a lot more room for a big battery than a phone.

 

tegra3 technically has 5 cores when you count that extra one it has...Though I am very very excited to see real world results with HTC OneX vs OneXL as they are identical phones and only difference really in the Tegra3 vs the S4 dual core...

 

Battery life speaking itll come down to whats better...the ghost core in the tegra3 thats 40nm, or the S4 which is 28nm....

You also have to take into consideration that the S4 at 28nm has integrated basebands too...performance/battery life improvements with that?...unknown right now...

 

I do find it funny that Apple announced its iPad with theoretical speeds of the tech ie +70Mbps LTE....So my thinking is HTC should start doing the same and just say their S4 chips are capable of doing 100Mbs DL since they technically are...lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know, thanks for the clarification.

 

dunno if i clarified anything though. lol

 

still lot of unknowns out there with terms of how much improvement battery wise we see with 28nm vs the 40nm...be tougher to compare with HTC built in battery too since evidently some say when you do this you can be more efficient with battery somehow as opposed to being removable? thats outa my realm there though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...