Jump to content

How many times....


DaQue

Recommended Posts

I trying to figure out how much mire data a full 3 band lte site would be compared to 3g. 800/1900 Lte what 12x each over evdo? 24x for the td-lte? That would be 1+12+12+24 or 49x what I am used to.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maximum bandwidth of a single EV-DO carrier is ~3.2 Mbps. Three sectors/carrier makes that ~9.6 Mbps.

 

Maximum bandwidth of a single 5x5 FDD-LTE carrier is ~37 Mbps. Three sectors/carrier makes that ~111 Mbps. Multiply that by two (as Sprint has a 5x5 on 1900 MHz PCS G Block and a 5x5 on 800 ESMR), to get ~222 Mbps.

 

I have no idea what the bandwidth of a 20 MHz 3:2 TDD-LTE carrier is. Someone else will have to answer that (so I can memorize the answer and how the math works).

 

It's difficult to assign a "multiplier" to this, as different cell sites have differing numbers of EV-DO carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what the bandwidth of a 20 MHz 3:2 TDD-LTE carrier is. Someone else will have to answer that (so I can memorize the answer and how the math works).

 

I covered the basic 20 MHz TDD math a few weeks ago in this post:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4083-sprint-td-lte-25002600mhz-discussion/?p=158089

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget to add in a bit for the voice carriers

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Welp, I'm gonna need to know how much bandwidth a 1X carrier has now...

 

I covered the basic 20 MHz TDD math a few weeks ago in this post:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4083-sprint-td-lte-25002600mhz-discussion/?p=158089

 

AJ

Aha! Exactly what I needed. So ~222 Mbps + (90 Mbps) * 3 [we're still splitting in to three sectors, right?] = ~492 Mbps. So that's ~51.2 times more bandwidth than a single EV-DO carrier.

 

Edit: I suppose I should update my math for proper sigfigs. (37.5) * 3 * 2 + (90.0) * 3 = 495, or ~51.6 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp, I'm gonna need to know how much bandwidth a 1X carrier has now...

 

Aha! Exactly what I needed. So ~222 Mbps + (90 Mbps) * 3 [we're still splitting in to three sectors, right?] = ~492 Mbps. So that's ~51.2 times more bandwidth than a single EV-DO carrier.

 

Edit: I suppose I should update my math for proper sigfigs. (37.5) * 3 * 2 + (90.0) * 3 = 495, or ~51.6 times.

 

Ah, but that total is like simultaneous orgasm on all carriers and airlinks.  And we know that never occurs in the real world.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, but that total is like simultaneous orgasm on all carriers and airlinks.  And we know that never occurs in the real world.

 

;)

 

AJ

Wireless nerd porn? :P

 

So, what could we expect for "reliable" backhaul to tri-band Sprint sites? We're still short of 500 Mbps, even with all that, and there's almost never a situation where, like you said, you can get maximum speed on everything at once. So 400 Mbps? I couldn't even begin to estimate. Apparently 100 Mbps is good enough for a 5x5 + EV-DO + 1X.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp, I'm gonna need to know how much bandwidth a 1X carrier has now...

 

Aha! Exactly what I needed. So ~222 Mbps + (90 Mbps) * 3 [we're still splitting in to three sectors, right?] = ~492 Mbps. So that's ~51.2 times more bandwidth than a single EV-DO carrier.

 

Edit: I suppose I should update my math for proper sigfigs. (37.5) * 3 * 2 + (90.0) * 3 = 495, or ~51.6 times.

Still don't have EVDO and 1xA traffic in there, so toss on a few more Mbps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still don't have EVDO and 1xA traffic in there, so toss on a few more Mbps

Well, the original question was how many times over "3G EV-DO", which as I pointed out early, is difficult to figure out, as sites have differing numbers of EV-DO carriers. So, I just calculated LTE compared to a single EV-DO carrier. 1X and 1XA aren't going to change that number much, maybe not even within a sigfig - and again, different sites may have different number of 1X 1900 carriers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mapped two n41 small cell sin Jersey City today. They're the first two to be mapped there in Jersey City as far as I can tell and interestingly they're consecutive gNBs, possibly indicating they were installed around the same time. gNB 1088335 appears to be an upgrade of an older small cell. It looks identical to the T-Mobile n41 small cell I mapped earlier this year in Old Westbury.   I also mapped gNB 1088334 in Newport. This small cell appears to be a new build as I couldn't find any evidence of an older small cell in that area. Unfortunately no pic of it since I didn't even notice that I mapped it until I got home and I can't find it in Streetview.
    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...