Jump to content

Samsung ATIV S


bucdenny

Recommended Posts

Robert, wouldn't the only way to get 52 down be with a 10x10 pcs carrier? Could they be testing something?

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

 

I assume he is using a Triband device and just on B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume he is using a Triband device and just on B41.

ATIV S NEO is a single band device, and that is Windows Phone in that screen shot.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATIV S NEO is a single band device, and that is Windows Phone in that screen shot.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

 

I know it's Windows Phone.  I have a Windows Phone product.  But I don't know what his device is capable of.  The speed could be a speed test error.  Or it's a 10MHz carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trying to figure out why it is coming up LTEAdvance on my Samsung Ativ S Neo which is only a band 25 device.

 

Any chance you can get an Engineering screen shot the next time that happens?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's Windows Phone. I have a Windows Phone product. But I don't know what his device is capable of. The speed could be a speed test error. Or it's a 10MHz carrier.

There is always the chance of a 10MHz carrier, but it would take them effort to push firmware to all older devices. I think it might be a fluke.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the chance of a 10MHz carrier, but it would take them effort to push firmware to all older devices. I think it might be a fluke.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

May have already happened. Sprint went back and had them all recertified to support 10MHz.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully?  Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot.  It is not a 52 Mbps speed test.  It reflects data usage:  1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

That is the way the app is reading what type of signal I'm getting, it isn't doing any download or uploads.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

I completely missed that. Good catch.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

I missed that too. Thanks AJ.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • These creditors are going to get screwed one way or another. I see no exit for them that will be painless. Rule # 1 - Never get in bed with Charlie.
    • https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/10/dish-creditors-revolt-over-directv-merger-try-to-block-loss-making-deal/ This deal could be dead before it starts.
    • I don't disagree entirely but a lot of the really rural coverage (like where I grew up) still has little or no competition.  There is a lot of overlap but there are also a number of unique sites that will help things. But also, the fact is that a lot of the rural T-Mobile coverage is still "map filler" coverage that doesn't actually provide reliable service.  This will help. https://imgur.com/a/LRWF3FO Using where I grew up as an example, magenta is T-Mobile, blue is US Cellular, and gold are unique sites Shentel planned but didn't get a chance to construct before the buyout derailed things. EDIT: And even a number of the T-Mobile sites shown here are Shentel conversions.  The only reason for the site NW of Keysville is that Shentel built that one before the buyout pause.  The site southwest of Meherrin wasn't a Shentel conversion, although Shentel did plan to build there, but rather was added to fill a gap along US-360 when the Shentel conversions were taking place.  Three of the five sites in Farmville proper are Shentel conversions also, as is the one north of town just barely on the map. - Trip
    • It feels really late for Tmo to buying USC now. They overbuilt so much of their area.  It's not a bad move. But it would have provided much more unique coverage earlier and would have captured more USC customers who have since churned. Probably a lot churned to Tmo as they have overbuilt them.  Robert
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...