Jump to content

PRL 60685/51085 analysis


Recommended Posts

So out of the recent phones which ones do not support it? Epic? Epic Touch? Photon? Curious on the higher end Android smart phones in the past 2 yrs.

 

I'd have to look up the teardown of each one and then check the RF gear in question. Everything is available out there if you google it. As far as the E4GT (that name is too long!), its Avago AFCM-7325 Quadplexer is designed for band classes 0,1,10, & 14. Again, I'm not sure what the baseband firmware (radio ROM) will accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the ratio of the power received from the carrier channel you're presently synced to for EVDO data versus the overall power received (it gives you an idea of the signal-to-noise ratio, but includes carrier pollution from other carriers with different PN offsets).

 

So it has nothing to do with the G channels? How would I tell? Channel Number in Debug?

 

 

FYI, with both 60683X and 60684X on my EVO, I am not seeing any PCS G (1225, 1250, 1275) search activity in Field Trial. Something seems amiss.

 

I am using CDMA Field Test. Is there a better app?

 

Sure wish someone would set up a primer on this stuff. I would like to be able to tell when they update towers in DFW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, a "blank" PCS G block PRL would be ideal. When I do my drive testing in Kansas City, I am more concerned about actively searching channels 1225, 1250, and 1275 than about having phone functionality. Furthermore, I have all sorts of other Sprint, VZW, and Alltel PRLs stored on my SD card, so I can load another PRL that will restore operation at any time.

 

Thanks...

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it has nothing to do with the G channels? How would I tell? Channel Number in Debug?

 

 

 

 

I am using CDMA Field Test. Is there a better app?

 

Sure wish someone would set up a primer on this stuff. I would like to be able to tell when they update towers in DFW.

 

No-- the Ec/Io ratio is just for the channel you're on whatever channel that is. The only way I know of to find out which channel you're on is the EPST (built-in) field test (##DEBUG#) screen. You should see the channel scanning on the 1x engineering screen when your phone is in idle slotted mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah. Channel 450.

 

Yes, in the Dallas-Fort Worth MTA, Sprint holds the PCS B block 30 MHz license. PCS B block CDMA1X/EV-DO standard channel assignments are 0425, 0450, 0475, 0500, 0525, 0550, 0575, 0600, 0625, 0650, 0675. Absent PCS G block, everyone of your Sprint channels in DFW will be one of those 11.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, still no luck with 60000 nor 60001. My EVO never scans 1225, 1250, and 1275; it immediately goes off PRL and scans channel assignments (e.g. PCS A block 0050, 0075, 0200; Cellular A-side 0283, etc.) stored in memory, apparently, and on which it has previously located service.

 

Though the EVO should be band class 14 capable, all recent experience seems to indicate that firmware locks out that capability.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, still no luck with 60000 nor 60001. My EVO never scans 1225, 1250, and 1275; it immediately goes off PRL and scans channel assignments (e.g. PCS A block 0050, 0075, 0200; Cellular A-side 0283, etc.) stored in memory, apparently, and on which it has previously located service.

 

Though the EVO should be band class 14 capable, all recent experience seems to indicate that firmware locks out that capability.

 

AJ

 

Yeah-- the EVO has the hardware to do it, but it's likely the Radio ROM (baseband firmware) doesn't allow it. It's a software not a hardware problem. The phone was probably only tested and FCC approved for band class 0 & 1, so all other bands are probably blocked out via firmware. Obviously the extra 5 MHz in BC 14 shouldn't be an interference issue or anything, but if FCC doesn't approve it, the phone won't be allowed to do it. It's likely the testers' phones are using a custom firmware for the testing and likely operate under an FCC temporary facilities / testing waiver. It was worth a shot-- and there may be other phones in service whose firmware may not have been so restricted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'd have to look up the teardown of each one and then check the RF gear in question. Everything is available out there if you google it. As far as the E4GT (that name is too long!), its Avago AFCM-7325 Quadplexer is designed for band classes 0,1,10, & 14. Again, I'm not sure what the baseband firmware (radio ROM) will accept.

 

Yeah, I don't think it would matter for the Epic anyways. It won't even roam over to use PCS band. It only roams on the cellular band. If I am in a vzw pcs only area I don't get no service when I am not within sprints area. In the rare occasion I am in an area with vzw pcs only I had to load a straight vzw prl to get signal.

 

Kinda sucks that Sprint neutered the Epic in roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My phone is showing Channel 25 and BC 1. Is that all PCS A block?

Yes-- PCS A block is 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, & 275. It is always one of these 11 channels. That's what Sprint has here in Baton Rouge too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't think it would matter for the Epic anyways. It won't even roam over to use PCS band. It only roams on the cellular band. If I am in a vzw pcs only area I don't get no service when I am not within sprints area. In the rare occasion I am in an area with vzw pcs only I had to load a straight vzw prl to get signal.

 

Kinda sucks that Sprint neutered the Epic in roaming.

I can make the G block scan native-- I just thought the flashing roam would be a nice "feature" for people to see. All I have to do is change the Roam Indicator field from 228 to 1 for all my "new" records (ACQ indices 32 & 34). But if the firmware doesn't support BC 14, it won't matter either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes-- PCS A block is 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, & 275. It is always one of these 11 channels. That's what Sprint has here in Baton Rouge too.

 

Thanks.

 

What other blocks of the PCS Spectrum does Sprint have? I now know the channel numbers for A,B, & G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

What other blocks of the PCS Spectrum does Sprint have? I now know the channel numbers for A,B, & G.

 

In bad, bad markets (Memphis, Atlanta, Houston), they have the "D" block I think (channels 325, 350, & 375 only). You can imagine how bad their service would be; however, in most of these markets (that Sprint cares about), they've added a few neighboring channel blocks like A5 (so they can use channels 275 and 300) or B1 (so they can use channels 400 and 425). Some markets, however, only have 3 available channels. E block is 725, 750, & 775. F block is 825, 850, & 875. C block is 925, 950, 975, 1000, 1025, 1050, 1075, 1100, 1125, 1150, & 1175. The inbetween channels are only valid if the licensee holds the channels on the other side (300, 400, 700, 800, 900, & 1200) require you to have the channels in the next block (or at least the first (or last) channel in that block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My phone is showing Channel 25 and BC 1. Is that all PCS A block?

 

Yes. Sprint holds the PCS A block 30 MHz license in both the Los Angeles-San Diego MTA (which extends beyond Las Vegas) and the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose MTA (which extends beyond Visalia). So, some/all of those 11 standard PCS A block channel assignments that 4ringsnbr detailed for you are the only native Sprint channels that you will encounter in California.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have the time to make a map that details what blocks of the PCS Spectrum and where they are located that Sprint holds? I would love to see one and have for reference. Or maybe I could build it if I can find some free time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What other blocks of the PCS Spectrum does Sprint have? I now know the channel numbers for A,B, & G.

 

Josh, Sprint holds mostly PCS A/B block 30 MHz licenses (or disaggregated portions thereof) and PCS D/E block 10 MHz licenses. Conversely, Sprint holds very few PCS C block 30 MHz licenses (or disaggregated portions thereof) and PCS F block 10 MHz licenses. PCS C/F block licenses were originally intended for designated entities (new entrants, small businesses, minority groups, etc.), not major wireless carriers.

 

My Sprint spectrum catalog and map are out of date yet still about 90 percent accurate. See here:

 

http://people.ku.edu/~cinema/wireless/spcs.html

http://people.ku.edu/~cinema/wireless/spcs_map.html

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Talk about a large stretch. Is A block the better part of the PCS Spectrum?

 

The PCS A/B block 30 MHz licenses are equivalent. They were the first PCS 1900 MHz licenses in the world and were auctioned in 1994-1995.

 

Sprint won the greatest number of PCS A/B block licenses nationally, followed by AT&TWS (the original AT&T, not the SBC based AT&T that we know today), then PrimeCo (which was part of the original VZW merger), then the carriers that eventually merged to become T-Mobile (Aerial, Omnipoint, Powertel, VoiceStream).

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have the data for the licenses that Sprint currently has? It would take a while to pick it out piece my piece out of the fcc spectrum dashboard.

 

I have culled current data from the FCC ULS and have updated most of the top markets. For example, I have this XLSX file in progress:

 

http://people.ku.edu/~cinema/sprint150.jpg

 

The markets below the top 100, however, are going to be a real task to bring up to date, as PCS licenses have oft been partitioned & disaggregated down to the county level (or even lower).

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have culled current data from the FCC ULS and have updated most of the top markets. For example, I have this XLSX file in progress:

 

http://people.ku.edu...a/sprint150.jpg

 

AJ

 

Awesome. It will be nice to see the completed file. And where do I find the ownership info for the SMR licenses? I have never been able to locate them on the FCC website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...