Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Winston/Salem Market (including Greensboro)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

The site covering that area was the one off of market near wendover. I think they finally adjusted the tilt of the antennas down. It was covering a huge area for awhile.

 

All quiet this week. Some sites that had been up were off today. For instance where Holden and High Point Rd cross. Have not seen LTE anywhere I have not seen it in the past. Just have to be patient.

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Highpoint and Holden was an antenna near the mall.  If it is coming from that far away I would be impressed.

everything you see in sensorly (inside city limits) is from 1 tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one on Veasly st? Man I wish...

 

I thought Highpoint and Holden was an antenna near the mall. If it is coming from that far away I would be impressed.

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when a tower is first upgraded the transmitters are pointed almost level which gives you a huge footprint.  After testing is completed they are adjusted to a normal footprint overlapping the 3G from that tower.  That explains some of those spots where you get LTE and then it is gone the next time you go looking for it.  So I think there are two towers on in High Point and the one we know about in Greensboro, three others outside the city limits in Guilford County.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE could be there...if you're not toggling the data connection yourself it could be 15 min before scans.   There are apps to help with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I go from Oak Ridge to Greensboro to High Point every day so if a tower is on I should see it at some point.  I always have my Sensorly on so I will know if I have found anything new.  Have been seeing LTE in the downtown Greensboro area but I think it is bleed thru from some where else.  The signal does not lead to a tower.  Also as Sprint switches its Clear wire  to LTE there will be better coverage but everyone will need new phones since that is a different frequency.  Rumors about tri band phones are out there but when where and how is still just rumors.  Talked to Sprint tonight and they are still saying that they will be done by the end of the year.  I get a strong 3G signal at home so if my nearest tower is switched I will know right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposed to be massively ramped up on installs and 3g conversions starting in November, I guess we will see how long it takes to finish.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

Excellent......B-)

 

but it's ok to eat fish cause they don't have feelings.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just took Wendover from 68 to Market, Market to Dolley Madison, Dolley Madison to Friendly. Sensorly on all the way and absolutely nothing indicating 4G in the entire area. Did they shut it down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they adjusted the antenna's so the coverage will be a smaller area.  You need to be down near the sheetz to tell if it is off.  I got some of south east area.  The tower is between Millpoint and Kessee, between Thacher Dairy and Mcdonnell.  Very rural down there so you can't go on to many other roads there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...