Jump to content

Network Speed


Recommended Posts

I wonder if the iPhone 5s (or i6) will support 800 LTE. I assume we will soon find out. If so I will go ahead and grab it in The fall and hope that when our LTE goes live here later in the year that 800 lights up as well. I guess my real question is, will the 800 LTE give me better speeds or just better building penetration. To be honest penetration is all I really care about. Give me 3 meg. Down and in building coverage and I'm satisfied!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest penetration is all I really care about.

 

Is this the Dr. Ruth forum?

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To be honest penetration is all I really care about.

 

 

Is this the Dr. Ruth forum?

 

;)

 

AJ

You win on that one lol

As soon as I hit the post button I saw that and was like....oh crap! :)

 

But seriously.... My motto on life...

 

Give me Pandora indoors or give me death. Lol ;)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess my real question is, will the 800 LTE give me better speeds or just better building penetration.

 

On the serious side, yes, while the LTE 1900 and LTE 800 carriers will generally be the same 5 MHz FDD bandwidth, the LTE 800 carrier will probably provide moderately faster data speeds because of at least two factors:  greater signal strength and lighter loading -- the latter due to fewer compatible devices initially.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I guess my real question is, will the 800 LTE give me better speeds or just better building penetration.

 

 

On the serious side, yes, while the LTE 1900 and LTE 800 carriers will generally be the same 5 MHz FDD bandwidth, the LTE 800 carrier will probably provide moderately faster data speeds because of at least two factors: greater signal strength and lighter loading -- the latter due to fewer compatible devices initially.

 

AJ

That's fair enough. How about inside? Will the 800 cut through these concrete walls better than 1900? Or is that just to situation based? I'm assuming it depends on alot of different factors.

 

Also From a speed stand point, is 800 less fragile (LTE wise) over a distance?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fair enough. How about inside? Will the 800 cut through these concrete walls better than 1900? Or is that just to situation based? I'm assuming it depends on alot of different factors.

 

Also From a speed stand point, is 800 less fragile (LTE wise) over a distance?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

 

Each structure is different, so there is no way to say.  In general, most concrete walls are impenetrable for all RF.  It is basically only coming through the windows, doors and possibly the roof.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea it's got to be the roof then. We have no windows in the manufacturing areas of the plant. With Sprints 1900 it's hit or miss out there. If what I've read here so far is the norm, and the 1900 is sneaking thru the roof in alot spots I'm hoping the 800 can punch thru a little better. Our company Nextels worked pretty well inside. They worked excellent once the installed the "repeater" on the manufacturing floor.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea it's got to be the roof then. We have no windows in the manufacturing areas of the plant. With Sprints 1900 it's hit or miss out there. If what I've read here so far is the norm, and the 1900 is sneaking thru the roof in alot spots I'm hoping the 800 can punch thru a little better. Our company Nextels worked pretty well inside. They worked excellent once the installed the "repeater" on the manufacturing floor.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

 

But with LTE, you won't see a "repeater" of sorts, at least, not at first. Your voice and 3G data services should be fine though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is off topic, but it was touched on a bit in this thread, which areas of the country will sprint NOT have 800 mhz service? I think Robert had said it would cover most all of the USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is off topic, but it was touched on a bit in this thread, which areas of the country will sprint NOT have 800 mhz service? I think Robert had said it would cover most all of the USA.

 

-Puerto Rico / Virgin Islands.

- 100 to 140km from the Canadian / Mexican borders due to the International Boundary Exclusion Zone (IBEZ). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The IBEZ is a temporary situation. It's well discussed throughout the forums here.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this thread has run its course. Topic is now closed.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
    • Interesting, I saw this too on my AT&T S22 while roaming on US Cellular. I thought it was an Android bug since CellMapper was doing the same thing (didn't get a screenshot of that one). N66 makes more sense than N1. 
    • Thanks, that was good timing, I did see your report as I was buttoning up this latest update and added an override for that.. did it not work?   Ok, was that on AT&T also? Please send a report if you happen to see it again and safely have the opportunity. You can always do the long-press on the fly and then send a later one with an explanation pointing to the earlier one.. your username is attached to the long-press reports, so it's not an issue.
    • I sent a report in earlier, n66 reporting as n1. There should be two different reports, I couldn't find the button the first time so I just long pressed the connection type to send, then I remembered where it was. I put a note about the issue on the 2nd report. Both reports from me are for the same issue. Also, it might have been on a prior release but earlier this week I also saw n66 reported as n65 on the app. I was driving and wasn't able to send a report in for that one. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...