Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

Any news on the 95835 area??

 

Thanks in advanced

 

 I believe that area has been upgraded already as it's only like 3-4 sites in that zip. We're mostly waiting on the rest of the city and unincorporated areas to get equipment installed so they can fire everything up at once in a big cluster launch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info. all this time i have been reading this thread I thought i'd pick up a signal when the tower was upgraded but now i get it...

 

Also has anyone had the same issue i have had... when ever I'm on the 5 freeway near the 50 exchange and im on the phone my phone reboots?? it's driving me crazy! it only happens when im on a call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info. all this time i have been reading this thread I thought i'd pick up a signal when the tower was upgraded but now i get it...

 

Also has anyone had the same issue i have had... when ever I'm on the 5 freeway near the 50 exchange and im on the phone my phone reboots?? it's driving me crazy! it only happens when im on a call.

 

That was true in the beginning and for most of the deployment in every market till the last 3 months or during the summer time. Samsung (our market vendor) has always wanted to be the first vendor to finish upgrading all their markets and was presented with an issue related to enhanced circuit switch fallback which is required for all new phones (see the csfb post on the front wall). The only fix for them is to upgrade the network as fast as possible and fire up the 3g side.

 

For samsung, their equipment cannot talk with the legacy equipment and so they always had to launch in clusters or else you get a lot of dropped calls whenever you bounce from one upgraded tower to a non upgraded tower. With the issue at hand, Samsung accelerated deployment in all their markets and have been cluster launching entire cities or regions all at once. LTE may get fired up every now and then but all signs point to them ignoring everything other than converting sites as fast as possible. 

 

Most Samsung vendor regions are going back on schedule thanks to the CSFB gap issue which forced them to deploy asap. Internally they're saying that the issue will be fixed in all major markets by Jan / Febuary time frame so that's the time I expect our entire region (100+ sites) to all get cluster launched. As it stands it's mostly the City of Sacramento sites that need to be done (a lot have been permited but awaiting available manpower - contractors - to do the job). 

 

Never happened to me so it might be an issue with your phone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well well well. It seems LTE has hit lodi! 

And its hit pretty hard, Speeds are all over the place but never below 2 up or down. 

Seems like I'm getting better speeds on east side/central lodi - 5-15 down and 2-5 up

and west side/woodbridge area is a tad slower 2-7 down 2-3 up

pings are fantastic everywhere 60-80ms

 

I'm stoked to test out performance after the official go-live. 

 

I haven't had a chance to test out stockton yet, I forgot my phone today. Will report in tomorrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know when upgrades are scheduled to hit east Rancho Cordova / Folsom? I've seen LTE on Sunrise by highway 50, but the sensorly maps look like they've been expanding south and to the west. Here at Hazel and 50, we've not seen anything yet. It looks like the closest tower is at 11840 Folsom Blvd, behind the Becks Furniture, (it may be on Marketplace lane), on the property at Schnitzer Steel.   We've had some disruptions lately, but I've not seen LTE light up yet, and nothing in Folsom either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And its hit pretty hard, Speeds are all over the place but never below 2 up or down.

Seems like I'm getting better speeds on east side/central lodi - 5-15 down and 2-5 up

and west side/woodbridge area is a tad slower 2-7 down 2-3 up

pings are fantastic everywhere 60-80ms

 

I'm stoked to test out performance after the official go-live.

 

I haven't had a chance to test out stockton yet, I forgot my phone today. Will report in tomorrow.

I find the lack of Sensorly tracks most disappointing. Do not fail again! =p

 

Sensorly!

 

Google Nexus 5

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the lack of Sensorly tracks most disappointing. Do not fail again! =p

 

Sensorly!

 

Google Nexus 5

I will run Sensorly on my way home today. Sir. ;-)

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be doing the mapping tomorrow morning and evening. Well, I'll try to map what I can around Lodi tonight. 

 

I find the lack of Sensorly tracks most disappointing. Do not fail again! =p

Sensorly!

Google Nexus 5

 

 

I will run Sensorly on my way home today. Sir. ;-)

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my drive up i5 from LA to sf. I got some cdma 800 in Patterson. 40 miles from my position.

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

I'm about 40 miles away from that tower as well. Still trying to figure out which tower I got CDMA 800 from.

 

Sucks my CDMA 800 signal didn't last long enough to get a screenshot of the exact location

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm about 40 miles away from that tower as well. Still trying to figure out which tower I got CDMA 800 from.

 

Sucks my CDMA 800 signal didn't last long enough to get a screenshot of the exact location

It went in and out alot as I drove closer to it. I also connected to some further south. But never got to see location before I lost it. So not sure if it was the same tower or not.

 

Sent from my SPH-P100 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the lack of Sensorly tracks most disappointing. Do not fail again! =p

 

Sensorly!

 

Google Nexus 5

i mapped around as I ran some errands today. I ran speed tests as much as I could while mapping as well.

More mapping to be done tomorrow morning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i mapped around as I ran some errands today. I ran speed tests as much as I could while mapping as well.

More mapping to be done tomorrow morning

 

I'm sure you want to challenge the one of the top sensorly mappers up in corning... :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
    • I found a multi-carrier oDAS node at the corner of Bushwick Ave & Cedar St. You can see an upgraded Verizon macro deployment behind the node, and T-Mobile has a fully upgraded site only a block away. So, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an AT&T node with LTE+mmWave (or maybe C-Band).
    • I tried going into a Boost Mobile store and they wouldn't sell me a rainbow SIM card, said that it would be dead as soon as I put it in the Moto Edge 2023... which I know is bs... 
    • They didn't do all 2.5 with the Sprint merger, so I'm not sure why they would do that for USCC in areas arguably more rural. But I'm 100% sure they'll swap out the gear. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...