Jump to content

NetMonitor Unsafe?


TheBigCandy

Recommended Posts

Hello fellow S4GRU users, I am barely learning about all the topics covered on this site so bear with me here. I was curious about the NetMonitor app because I want to locate the towers that are near me just so I can keep an eye out to know whether or not there is work being done on them over the next few weeks or however long it takes(I am located in Rancho Cucamonga so I am aware that NV upgrades should be headed here soon).

 

So I took a look in the comments/reviews for the app and ran into a comment that made me hesitant about it. The comment went on saying that it is unsafe and can ruin your phone so if you put in alot of money in for the phone beware. I would like to get the app but I dont want to risk my phone. I have the EVO LTE and this is my 3rd replacement and I did have to pay $150 deductible for the 2nd one. Can anyone give me their take on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No app will consistently locate Sprint sites. That requires a little bit of know how and legwork.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 2/23/2013 at 2:42 PM, WiWavelength said:

No app will consistently locate Sprint sites. That requires a little bit of know how and legwork.

 

AJ

 

Yeah, but Belgrade, Singapore, and Buenos Aires? That seems like a stretch.

I also get bizarre location names with NetMonitor, but on its "map" screen, cells seem to be located exactly as they squawk.

Therein lies the rub: In NE Illinois where I spend most of my time, squawk locations are dead on. When I bring up a map like the one above and zoom in, I am directly on top of the cell -- in satelite mode, the placement is perfect.

 

But in places like Milwaukee and Las Vegas, the squawks are offset for each sector, usually in a triangular pattern with the cell near the center of the triangle. Note BSID's 00509, 00510, and 00511 on this 2-week-old map of northwest Las Vegas, below: They are almost certainly 3 sectors on the same tower (I think it's near W. Ann Rd and the 215), but are shown as miles apart.

Thus, the usefulness of the map, and the ease of finding your cell(s) depends on where you are mapping.

 

To get back to TheBigCandy's question, I have used NetMonitor for over a year, and have had not any problem with it ruining any of the phones that I have used it on. Although, just to be safe, I will probably not take any of my phones to Belgrade, Singapore, OR Buenos Aires. :D

 

 

Screenshot.jpg

Screenshot2.jpg

Edited by tommym65
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have use NetMonitor on over a dozen devices and never had any issues with it damaging or ruining any of my devices. I don't think it's even crashed before.

 

The accuracy is the only issue. NetMonitor is dead to rights accurate in the Albuquerque market. But when I go to Texas, most sites are shown with the offset sector method and not directly on the site.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use to love the app, but it gives me the wrong locations. As you can see I do live in Toledo Ohio... I think it's because of the permissions it uses to find your location

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Those aren't tower locations that it's giving you in that list. It's telling you where you where when you picked up the site. It's a somewhat recent bug in the application likely due to a screw up on the devs implementation of geo coding, it could literally be as much as a typo in the source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I saw the comments on Google Play about Netmonitor being a "dangerous" app, but having frequently used it for over a year, I can say I've never seen any indications that it harmed anything on any of my phones.

 

One of the last few Netmonitor updates did break the geocoding. Even though Sprint sites in my area broadcast the sector offset location instead of the tower location, it was always accurate. Now, as someone else pointed out, the map still appears correct, but the text description of the address is off by thousands of miles.

 

I tried contacting the developer several times without any response. So, I decided to put the geocoding feature into my own app instead, and it works like a charm :)

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...