Jump to content

NetMonitor Unsafe?


TheBigCandy

Recommended Posts

Hello fellow S4GRU users, I am barely learning about all the topics covered on this site so bear with me here. I was curious about the NetMonitor app because I want to locate the towers that are near me just so I can keep an eye out to know whether or not there is work being done on them over the next few weeks or however long it takes(I am located in Rancho Cucamonga so I am aware that NV upgrades should be headed here soon).

 

So I took a look in the comments/reviews for the app and ran into a comment that made me hesitant about it. The comment went on saying that it is unsafe and can ruin your phone so if you put in alot of money in for the phone beware. I would like to get the app but I dont want to risk my phone. I have the EVO LTE and this is my 3rd replacement and I did have to pay $150 deductible for the 2nd one. Can anyone give me their take on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No app will consistently locate Sprint sites. That requires a little bit of know how and legwork.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 2/23/2013 at 2:42 PM, WiWavelength said:

No app will consistently locate Sprint sites. That requires a little bit of know how and legwork.

 

AJ

 

Yeah, but Belgrade, Singapore, and Buenos Aires? That seems like a stretch.

I also get bizarre location names with NetMonitor, but on its "map" screen, cells seem to be located exactly as they squawk.

Therein lies the rub: In NE Illinois where I spend most of my time, squawk locations are dead on. When I bring up a map like the one above and zoom in, I am directly on top of the cell -- in satelite mode, the placement is perfect.

 

But in places like Milwaukee and Las Vegas, the squawks are offset for each sector, usually in a triangular pattern with the cell near the center of the triangle. Note BSID's 00509, 00510, and 00511 on this 2-week-old map of northwest Las Vegas, below: They are almost certainly 3 sectors on the same tower (I think it's near W. Ann Rd and the 215), but are shown as miles apart.

Thus, the usefulness of the map, and the ease of finding your cell(s) depends on where you are mapping.

 

To get back to TheBigCandy's question, I have used NetMonitor for over a year, and have had not any problem with it ruining any of the phones that I have used it on. Although, just to be safe, I will probably not take any of my phones to Belgrade, Singapore, OR Buenos Aires. :D

 

 

Screenshot.jpg

Screenshot2.jpg

Edited by tommym65
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have use NetMonitor on over a dozen devices and never had any issues with it damaging or ruining any of my devices. I don't think it's even crashed before.

 

The accuracy is the only issue. NetMonitor is dead to rights accurate in the Albuquerque market. But when I go to Texas, most sites are shown with the offset sector method and not directly on the site.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use to love the app, but it gives me the wrong locations. As you can see I do live in Toledo Ohio... I think it's because of the permissions it uses to find your location

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Those aren't tower locations that it's giving you in that list. It's telling you where you where when you picked up the site. It's a somewhat recent bug in the application likely due to a screw up on the devs implementation of geo coding, it could literally be as much as a typo in the source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I saw the comments on Google Play about Netmonitor being a "dangerous" app, but having frequently used it for over a year, I can say I've never seen any indications that it harmed anything on any of my phones.

 

One of the last few Netmonitor updates did break the geocoding. Even though Sprint sites in my area broadcast the sector offset location instead of the tower location, it was always accurate. Now, as someone else pointed out, the map still appears correct, but the text description of the address is off by thousands of miles.

 

I tried contacting the developer several times without any response. So, I decided to put the geocoding feature into my own app instead, and it works like a charm :)

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It’s a neat and seemingly valid / effective strategy that, at least from my understanding, is only really used by VZW
    • Those are usually left over from the initial AWS deployment, so all run B13/B66 with support for BC0/BC1 (although that’s been shut off on most sites). No NR. Sites with the later Ericsson radios got an OTA update and broadcast B2. On those sites, a B5 OTA update was also available (and tested), but ultimately rolled back. Putting up all that power/spectrum severely degraded the B13 output.  The site atop Crystal Mountain is another story and uses the same setup as the site on the ridge near Neilton. These antennas were selected for their vertical beamwidth. Most modern directional antennas have small vertical beamwidths and would require extreme downtilt to cover the road next to a steep ridge. Thus, they would have a severely limited coverage footprint beyond the road. Omnis can be a better choice in these instances, especially when there’s LoS to the coverage objective (since they’ll generally have lower gain figures). Omnis also don’t run in to the horizontal sector edge problem, which can be difficult to optimize for with directional antennas that have complex or irregular 3D gain profiles. That’s why on a lot of sites on mountains, you’ll see wider antennas used. For example, the Verizon site on Joyce Ridge has three sectors with 80-degree HBW antennas. 
    • Do you know what RAN is behind those Omni's? LTE (bands?) are they pushing any NR through them? Very curious   edit: I guess I could check cellmapper etc but you might know more nuance!
    • N41 here has been expanded from 140Mhz to 180Mhz.  Speeds seem the same so they just need to work on backhaul
    • I noticed today that T-mobile has shut of B41 LTE in the Louisville area and widened the 2nd n41 carrier to 80MHz. That just leaves them with 5x5 B12, 10x10 B2, and two 10x10 B66 carriers on LTE, everything else is in NR (besides their 2G network). They have 20x20 n71, 20x20 n25, 5x5 n25, and 180MHz n41. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...