Jump to content

AT&T Receives Spectrum Approval


4GHoward

Recommended Posts

 

I agree that WiMax is less than ideal. But that being said, Puerto Rico only had WiMax Protection Sites. Protection sites are deployed with zero downtilt to maximize coverage. This only made the penetration problem worse. In fully deployed and appropriately dense network conditions, WiMax performed OK. But Sprint LTE is superior in every way.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

I had no idea that protection sites had no downtilt. I learn something everyday :D

 

I also wanted to add that if you were to go on a roadtrip or something similar when you are constantly moving from one site to another the handoff is incredibly slow. Very ineficient for a cell phone in my opinion.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has some WCS, and in the near future, it will hopefully become more valuable because at&t is going to utilize the band.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus running Paradigm 3.0 using Forum Runner

 

Maybe they can exchange it for some PCS in Florida :) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, VZW should use the spectrum or give it back. There needs to be a timeline. What VZW is doing is anti-competitive and they are trying to create a duopoly with AT&T.

 

I am not sure what makes you think that there is no timeline. See Title 47 Parts 27.13 and 27.14.

 

http://www.ecfr.gov/....0.1.1.5.2.49.4

 

The timeline is long for AWS 2100+1700 MHz licenses because the spectrum is not ideal. Government incumbents have to be relocated from the 1700 MHz uplink. No AWS licensee has hit its first buildout deadline yet, so no AWS spectrum should be revoked yet.

 

And lest you think that I am soft on the duopoly, I suggest that you read almost anything that I have written here at S4GRU. Try a search on "anti competitive asshats." That should bring up some of my scathing criticisms of both VZW and AT&T. Moreover, if you want my perspective on carriers using protection sites to retain licenses, read the very first piece that I wrote for S4GRU.

 

http://s4gru.com/ind...t-of-hypocrisy/

 

For basically a decade, I have hammered away at the use of protection sites. But there is a big difference between fat and happy AT&T sitting on prime PCS 1900 MHz spectrum in smaller markets and cash strapped Clearwire grinding to a halt with marginal BRS/EBS 2600 MHz spectrum in several already well served major markets.

 

Regardless, your protests, Richard, strike me less as concerned altruism about use of public spectrum, more as sour grapes over the dearth of WiMAX in San Diego County.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Regardless, your protests, Richard, strike me less as concerned altruism about use of public spectrum, more as sour grapes over the dearth of WiMAX in San Diego County.

This is true. I really do HATE HATE HATE Clearwire. With that being said, it really has opened my eyes to the practices of all the cell phone companies. They basically can hold a community hostage. They milk every last dime they can out of the consumer and don't give a damn about fairly using the public airwaves. Not providing adequate cell coverage can give an entire region an economic disadvantage. What business would want to operate in an area without proper 4G coverage? I doubt I will be any less bitter until Sprint 4G is widespread in San Diego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true. I really do HATE HATE HATE Clearwire. With that being said, it really has opened my eyes to the practices of all the cell phone companies. They basically can hold a community hostage. They milk every last dime they can out of the consumer and don't give a damn about fairly using the public airwaves. Not providing adequate cell coverage can give an entire region an economic disadvantage. What business would want to operate in an area without proper 4G coverage? I doubt I will be any less bitter until Sprint 4G is widespread in San Diego.

 

Dude calm down man....sprint has bought clearwire and now has the rights to the 2.5 ghz spectrum. Once the deal is finalizes...i expect to see huge ramp up of 2.5 ghz TDD LTE in 2014. I expect sprint to focus on the 1900 mhz and 800 mhz LTE build out in 2013

 

Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...