Jump to content

Connecting to 4G Towers (Galaxy Note 2)

ks-man
 Share

Recommended Posts

ks-man Member Level: 1x Advanced

ks-man

Posted
Posted

I was having issues with my new Galaxy Note 2 connecting to LTE towers. I would get them after an airplane mode cycle and was concerned that it might be suffering from the same issues that the EVO LTE has.

 

I started this thread at XDA and somebody told me to turn Roaming mode from Auto to Sprint Only and it seems to be working well.

 

Just wanted to let other people know in case they are having similar issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I was having issues with my new Galaxy Note 2 connecting to LTE towers. I would get them after an airplane mode cycle and was concerned that it might be suffering from the same issues that the EVO LTE has.

 

I started this thread at XDA and somebody told me to turn Roaming mode from Auto to Sprint Only and it seems to be working well.

 

Just wanted to let other people know in case they are having similar issues.

 

This is no different than the Galaxy S-III. The issue with the EVO LTE wasn't just cycling airplane mode to connect, but it wouldn't stay connected. In areas where the GS3, Viper and Galaxy Nexus would. So far, other than the iPhone, none of the Android devices are fast at finding LTE signals on their own on the Sprint network. If you wait awhile, it will connect on its own. But if you want LTE immediately after getting into a coverage area, you will have to cycle.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites
usguyver Member Level: Analog

usguyver

Posted
Posted
This is no different than the Galaxy S-III. The issue with the EVO LTE wasn't just cycling airplane mode to connect, but it wouldn't stay connected. In areas where the GS3, Viper and Galaxy Nexus would. So far, other than the iPhone, none of the Android devices are fast at finding LTE signals on their own on the Sprint network. If you wait awhile, it will connect on its own. But if you want LTE immediately after getting into a coverage area, you will have to cycle. Robert

my Evo lte stays connected to lte after i airplane it, but will take some time too canect on its ownelps , i changed the scan timer to 15 it was 30 it helps a little pit im thinks of changing it to 5 and see if that helps and change it to sprint only but im also in LA so its not offical lonched yet so i may wait to see if it makes a diffence when its offical to make changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

my Evo lte stays connected to lte after i airplane it, but will take some time too canect on its ownelps , i changed the scan timer to 15 it was 30 it helps a little pit im thinks of changing it to 5 and see if that helps and change it to sprint only but im also in LA so its not offical lonched yet so i may wait to see if it makes a diffence when its offical to make changes

 

I am speaking of my personal observations in a completely deployed FIT area in Waco, Texas. In areas between sites when the signal would drop pretty low, the EVO LTE would often lose connection where the others could maintain. If the signal stayed strong or moderate, the EVO LTE would stay connected. And then after losing it and getting back into stronger coverage, the other devices were still on 4G, but the EVO LTE had to be cycled again to get back to 4G. It was very annoying.

 

Adjusting the scan timer would not have any effect on keeping a signal, only, possibly in initially connecting or reconnecting to LTE. In our tests, adjusting the LTE scan timer had no effect whatsoever on the time it took for the EVO to find a LTE signal on its own. And it was always dead last in ever finding a signal on its own. But most of the time, we got tired of waiting for the EVO to find the signal when all the other devices in our test had connected, that we would cycle through airplane mode.

 

The EVO is a dog when it comes to LTE Connectivity. It only becomes really apparent when you use it side by side with other Sprint LTE devices. S4GRU owns every Sprint LTE device except the iPhone and Samsung Victory.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites
usguyver Member Level: Analog

usguyver

Posted
Posted

 

I am speaking of my personal observations in a completely deployed FIT area in Waco, Texas. In areas between sites when the signal would drop pretty low, the EVO LTE would often lose connection where the others could maintain. If the signal stayed strong or moderate, the EVO LTE would stay connected. And then after losing it and getting back into stronger coverage, the other devices were still on 4G, but the EVO LTE had to be cycled again to get back to 4G. It was very annoying.

 

Adjusting the scan timer would not have any effect on keeping a signal, only, possibly in initially connecting or reconnecting to LTE. In our tests, adjusting the LTE scan timer had no effect whatsoever on the time it took for the EVO to find a LTE signal on its own. And it was always dead last in ever finding a signal on its own. But most of the time, we got tired of waiting for the EVO to find the signal when all the other devices in our test had connected, that we would cycle through airplane mode.

 

The EVO is a dog when it comes to LTE Connectivity. It only becomes really apparent when you use it side by side with other Sprint LTE devices. S4GRU owns every Sprint LTE device except the iPhone and Samsung Victory.

 

Robert

sorry I meant no disrespect I just like my lte so I would like mine to work properly

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

sorry I meant no disrespect I just like my lte so I would like mine to work properly

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

I didn't see your post as disrespectful at all. I just was taking an opportunity to explain my background with the EVO LTE connectivity issues.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites
usguyver Member Level: Analog

usguyver

Posted
Posted

 

I didn't see your post as disrespectful at all. I just was taking an opportunity to explain my background with the EVO LTE connectivity issues.

 

Robert

oh ok thanks that was good info and do you know if sprint going to fix the evo lte

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

oh ok thanks that was good info and do you know if sprint going to fix the evo lte

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Either the answer is No, because they haven't yet. Or maybe, if they can figure out a solution. I'm not sure they have even figured out the problem.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Member Level: 3G EVDO

Hugo

Posted
Posted

oh ok thanks that was good info and do you know if sprint going to fix the evo lte

 

PMFJI, but also, HTC has been having financial problems... Anyway, I wouldn't raise my hopes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ks-man Member Level: 1x Advanced

ks-man

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This is no different than the Galaxy S-III. The issue with the EVO LTE wasn't just cycling airplane mode to connect, but it wouldn't stay connected. In areas where the GS3, Viper and Galaxy Nexus would. So far, other than the iPhone, none of the Android devices are fast at finding LTE signals on their own on the Sprint network. If you wait awhile, it will connect on its own. But if you want LTE immediately after getting into a coverage area, you will have to cycle.

 

Robert

 

Understood.

 

The main thing I found is that the phone defaults to Automatic which appears to be slower in picking up the LTE coverage. Switching to Home Only (thanks Brendan4t) seems to have that connection pick up more quickly. This is useful for when you're driving and streaming music as it is important to quickly grab the LTE network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
Robert you have any LTE issues with your new Note 2?

 

I do not live in a LTE market. I only use LTE when I travel. I may be in Wichita Falls in a few weeks and will perform testing on it then.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
A454nova Member Level: 3G EVDO

A454nova

Posted
Posted

I do have Lte and the Note 2, as well as the S3. N2 is way better hands down. My house is on the outside edge of a signal. (-106 to -111 RSRP and very high SNR) The S3 once in a while picked it up and jumps on and off, on and off... keeping my data in limbo. sucks big balls. The note 2, I walk out side and it grabs within seconds and holds. N2 seems a little quicker on the web under 3G. I can set both my S3, my Wife's, and The N2 next to each other and the N2 Wins every time. Holding both and going outside. N2 will switch and when ever the S3 gets it, its not holding it. In a good Lte area but at the edge of the map. Example, Texas Motor Speed way. N2 will have already switch and the S3 might have?... Nope, oh but my wife's S3 did... (5 mins later) There it is. You can never tell unless you cycle it. BUT, if your in an area like southern Keller, TX. That has real good coverage, they all work fine it seems. A big deal is the note doesn't jump on and off over and over when its right at that point of getting it.

 

If feels like the S3 isn't as strong but the threshold is to high. Where the Note is stronger with the same threshold. a lot smoother switch between 3G and 4G on the N2 as well. Also I have a real had time getting Wimax 4G with either of them. Thought they would fix that on the N2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gr8nuguy Member Level: 4G LTE

gr8nuguy

Posted
Posted

lol@wimax. cant tell if your joking/being sarcastic with wimax or not but should be NOTEd that neither device has wimax radios.

 

Also I have a real had time getting Wimax 4G with either of them. Thought they would fix that on the N2.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • iansltx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By iansltx · Posted

      A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • iansltx
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • iansltx
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • cooltech6597
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By cooltech6597 · Posted

      Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • JossMan
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By JossMan · Posted

      What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...