Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)

S4GRU

By S4GRU
in Markets

 Share

Recommended Posts

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also, 165 ping 2.53 down and .7 up. I am inside a warehouse, North of Paseo and West of Washington. Things are really getting better.

I was just in that area at Yearout Mechanical's office in September and my Sprint 3G data kept timing out. So that was a pretty bad area. A much needed improvement. I couldn't get a Tmo signal inside the building at all. AT&T LTE was unusable. I had to use my VZW hotspot. :(

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

S4GRU
S4GRU

They are starting the ABQ market with the site next to my house. I just ran into subcontractors for Ericsson who are starting to upgrade my site in El Valle de Arroyo Seco, New Mexico. Unbelievable!!!

S4GRU
S4GRU

OK. I've now uploaded pics. I talked with the guys there. They are electricians hired by SBA. SBA is subcontracted to Ericsson. They are here to install the RRU's only today. My site here did no

techcj_manzer
techcj_manzer

Also, here's a quick speed test while I stopped to pick my dinner up @ Uptown     Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted Images

john69 Member Level: Digital

john69

Posted
Posted

I was just in that area at Yearout Mechanical's office in September and my Sprint 3G data kept timing out. So that was a pretty bad area. A much needed improvement. I couldn't get a Tmo signal inside the building at all. AT&T LTE was unusable. I had to use my VZW hotspot. :(

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

You too!

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wd6f7etkba5tcrf/Photo%20Jan%2001%2C%2011%2009%2042%20AM.png

 

So the link is the speed test at Dillard's at i40 and Louisiana. I can't believe that I got 105 ping with as many people that are here. Speed wasnot outstanding. However I was pulling we pages just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You too!

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wd6f7etkba5tcrf/Photo%20Jan%2001%2C%2011%2009%2042%20AM.png

 

So the link is the speed test at Dillard's at i40 and Louisiana. I can't believe that I got 105 ping with as many people that are here. Speed wasnot outstanding. However I was pulling we pages just fine.

With that kind of ping, things that only use small amounts of data will feel very fast. That could just be a provisioning problem at the switch. I don't recall ever seeing a ping that low with a speed that low before. :fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

With that kind of ping, things that only use small amounts of data will feel very fast. That could just be a provisioning problem at the switch. I don't recall ever seeing a ping that low with a speed that low before. :fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

I would have to agree.  Interesting was that I took the screen shot on my phone and I was able to upload the picture over 3G. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I would have to agree. Interesting was that I took the screen shot on my phone and I was able to upload the picture over 3G.

Did you try a few servers? It could have actually just been a server problem causing slower throughput.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shmoe723 Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

shmoe723

Posted
Posted

Did you try a few servers? It could have actually just been a server problem causing slower throughput.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

I was in the same Dillard's yesterday (unfortunately) and was getting horrible service.  However, not joke, the sheer number of people there was frightening and I suppose the nearest switch could have been a little overwhelmed.  I nearly jumped for joy when my girlfriend agreed, it wasn't worth the efforts to be in that store on that day and we left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

I was in the same Dillard's yesterday (unfortunately) and was getting horrible service. However, not joke, the sheer number of people there was frightening and I suppose the nearest switch could have been a little overwhelmed. I nearly jumped for joy when my girlfriend agreed, it wasn't worth the efforts to be in that store on that day and we left.

I was patiently waiting in the car.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AliveThrouDeath Member Level: Smoke Signals

AliveThrouDeath

Posted
Posted

Well I'm wondering what's up there, because I was at the tower on Juan Tabo on the south side of I-40 and got 1.91/0.96 with a ping of 104. I have noticed almost everywhere I'm at that hasn't been upgraded, I'm guessing, I have been getting upload speeds 2X as fast as download.

That's the weird thing - once I get near I-40, the speed shoots up to at least reasonable, but near Central and south of Central it plummets to intolerably slow.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
khammondnm Member Level: eHRPD

khammondnm

Posted
Posted

My speeds are back in the toilet. Calls not going through, network communication issues and so on. Been having this problem from north of Paseo to south of Central. Come on Sprint.

I wouldn't worry too much. This up and down happened in most markets right before they were about to launch lte.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • dkyeager
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths

      By mikejeep · Posted

      After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • clbowens
      Galaxy S23

      By clbowens · Posted

      Oct security update is out.
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...