Jump to content

More Foxconn trouble for Apple


pyroscott

Recommended Posts

A Foxconn factory reportedly employing approximately 79,000 workers in Taiyuan was shut down after approximately 2000 workers were involved in a riot after security was observed beating one of the workers.

 

While there are surely many other companies being supplied by this factory, Apple's name was the only name tossed into the mix.

 

Does Apple need to look elsewhere for manufacturing than Foxconn? The Chinese manufacturer is not good for their image, and are notorious for mistreatment of their estimated 1 million employees. Where would Apple look for manufacturing muscle if not Foxconn? They can't really afford to have their name inserted in the articles every time there is trouble at Foxconn, but some might say that Apple is already synonymous with Foxconn...

 

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/rioting-sweeps-chinese-apple-iphone-5-factory-171230302.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I would prefer more of the assembly come back to the USA but Apple's major problem is they need to make so many devices that they don't have many options. They've already diversified to Pegatron and others. The Chinese government puts up all the money to train engineers, build factories, etc all on speculation that they might get an Apple order. Unless the US government engages in some .SOCIALISM. who is going to take on such a project?

 

I'm all for the government handing free engineering degree funding to anyone who wants one, funding construction of factories, etc to bring iPhone manufacturing here to the states. Let me know when that seems like a political possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer more of the assembly come back to the USA

 

Here, here! I would consider buying one if they did, and pay a $50 - $100 premium for it. :twitch:

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd certainly pay a $50 premium for a high-end smartphone if assembly was done in the US. I wonder how many hours assembly takes though...$50 might not be large enough to cover the cost delta between US and Chinese wages...though for putting together phones that's probably only semi-skilled labor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the assembly labor is already such a low portion of the overall cost it won't matter that much (and robot assembly can offset it somewhat).

 

My understanding of it is that in China they literally put thousands of engineers, production managers, etc through school, setup component supply chains, raw material forges, etc. They've built a massive infrastructure dedicated to producing parts. The amount of capital required to fund that requires a state bank willing to take massive losses for years until it can turn a profit... Exactly what the Chinese state bank does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very good point. The Atlantic recently did a good article on how China has bankrolled these companies.

 

It's also worth noting that most of the big name computer and phone companies use Foxconn. Only Apple gets bashed about it, because any article about Apple instantly gets a million hits.

 

It also doesn't appear that Foxconn is really any worse than any other Chinese company. Here is one of the better articles I've seen by a sociologist that spent 10 years studying Chinese labor.

 

The only option might be to bring manufacturing back to north america. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple and other companies are looking into it. But it's the kind of massive worldwide logistical exercise that can't possibly happen quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if/when it comes back, it's going to be all robotic. If you can just upload a program and have thousands of robots churn out phones then why not? If anyone attempts it, I bet Apple would. They need more capacity in general and have the funds to invest.

 

Of course a lot of stuff is made here already - the Gorilla glass, their CPUs are made in Austin, TI supplies several chips, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...