Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE Deployment Running List


Recommended Posts

West Iowa/Nebraska
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 77%
LTE Launched = March 17, 2014 (Lincoln launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Complete = April 2014

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Kentucky
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 98%

LTE Sites Accepted = 90%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Elizabethtown launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantial Completion = July 2014

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Texas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 96%

LTE Sites Accepted = 67%
LTE Launched = September 16, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = January 2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alabama

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 97%

LTE Sites Accepted = 55%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Anniston/Oxford/Montgomery launched 9/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = May 2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Albuquerque
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Under Way
NV Sites Accepted = 88%

LTE Sites Accepted = 42%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Clovis launched 10/2013, El Paso 12/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = August 2015

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arkansas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues

NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 55%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Ft. Smith launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014

Complete = March 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 76%
LTE Launched = July 30, 2014 (Jamestown/Dunkirk launched 12/2013, Olean 1/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = May 2014

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cincinnati

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 93%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Greenville/Springfield launched 1/2014, Dayton launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = August 2014

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbus
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 90%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Marion launched 1/2014, Zanesville 3/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = August 2014

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

East Texas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 98%

LTE Sites Accepted = 78%
LTE Launched = October 31, 2013 (Nacogdoches launched 7/2013, Longview/Lufkin/Ruston launched 9/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantially Complete = March 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawaii
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing

NV Sites Accepted = 94%

LTE Sites Accepted = 51%
LTE Launched = February 19, 2015

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = June 2015

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisiana
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 96%

LTE Sites Accepted = 75%
LTE Launched = September 16, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lower Central Valley
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99.6%

LTE Sites Accepted = 60%
LTE Launched = February 19, 2015 (Bakersfield/Visalia/Porterville launched 3/2014, Madera/Chowchilla launched 4/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = October 2014

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mississippi

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 48%
LTE Launched = January 27, 2014 (Greenville launched 9/2013, Laurel/Picayune 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014

Substantial Completion = March 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Northern Connecticut
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 63%
LTE Launched = June 23, 2014 (Willamantic launched 3/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = December 2014

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

North LA
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Under Way
NV Sites Accepted = 89%

LTE Sites Accepted = 46%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (San Luis Obispo/Paso Robles launched 6/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = June 2015

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

North Wisconsin
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 71%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Fond du Lac launched 6/2013, Wausau launched 7/2013, Sheboygan/Wisconsin Rapids launched 9/2013, Stevens Point launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantial Completion = January 2014

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Tunnel Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 61%
LTE Launched = July 30, 2014 (New Castle launched 1/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = September 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rochester
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 53%
LTE Launched = February 21, 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = January 2014

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richmond
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 97%

LTE Sites Accepted = 73%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = October 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southern Virginia
Status:  NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 92%

LTE Sites Accepted = 15%
Anticipated LTE Launch = Q4 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = November 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swiftel (Sprint Affiliate)
Status:  Planning
NV Sites Accepted = 0%

LTE Sites Accepted = 0%
Anticipated LTE Launch = TBD

Original Scheduled Completion = Unknown
Current Production Rate Completion = TBD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panhandle
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 81%
LTE Launched = October 31, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toledo
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 72%
LTE Launched = April 29, 2014 (Findlay launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = April 2014

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upper Central Valley
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 70%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Red Bluff launched 10/2013, Reno/Sparks/Carson City launched 1/2014, Yuba City/Marysville launched 2/2014, Modesto/Turlock launched 4/2014, Eureka/Redding 7/2014, Sacramento/Stockton launched 9/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = September 2014

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...