Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE Deployment Running List


Recommended Posts

West Iowa/Nebraska
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 77%
LTE Launched = March 17, 2014 (Lincoln launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Complete = April 2014

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Kentucky
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 98%

LTE Sites Accepted = 90%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Elizabethtown launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantial Completion = July 2014

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Texas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 96%

LTE Sites Accepted = 67%
LTE Launched = September 16, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = January 2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alabama

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 97%

LTE Sites Accepted = 55%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Anniston/Oxford/Montgomery launched 9/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = May 2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Albuquerque
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Under Way
NV Sites Accepted = 88%

LTE Sites Accepted = 42%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Clovis launched 10/2013, El Paso 12/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = August 2015

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arkansas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues

NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 55%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Ft. Smith launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014

Complete = March 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 76%
LTE Launched = July 30, 2014 (Jamestown/Dunkirk launched 12/2013, Olean 1/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = May 2014

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cincinnati

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 93%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Greenville/Springfield launched 1/2014, Dayton launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = August 2014

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbus
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 90%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Marion launched 1/2014, Zanesville 3/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = August 2014

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

East Texas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 98%

LTE Sites Accepted = 78%
LTE Launched = October 31, 2013 (Nacogdoches launched 7/2013, Longview/Lufkin/Ruston launched 9/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantially Complete = March 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawaii
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing

NV Sites Accepted = 94%

LTE Sites Accepted = 51%
LTE Launched = February 19, 2015

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = June 2015

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisiana
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 96%

LTE Sites Accepted = 75%
LTE Launched = September 16, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lower Central Valley
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99.6%

LTE Sites Accepted = 60%
LTE Launched = February 19, 2015 (Bakersfield/Visalia/Porterville launched 3/2014, Madera/Chowchilla launched 4/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = October 2014

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mississippi

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 48%
LTE Launched = January 27, 2014 (Greenville launched 9/2013, Laurel/Picayune 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014

Substantial Completion = March 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Northern Connecticut
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 63%
LTE Launched = June 23, 2014 (Willamantic launched 3/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = December 2014

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

North LA
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Under Way
NV Sites Accepted = 89%

LTE Sites Accepted = 46%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (San Luis Obispo/Paso Robles launched 6/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = June 2015

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

North Wisconsin
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 71%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Fond du Lac launched 6/2013, Wausau launched 7/2013, Sheboygan/Wisconsin Rapids launched 9/2013, Stevens Point launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantial Completion = January 2014

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Tunnel Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 61%
LTE Launched = July 30, 2014 (New Castle launched 1/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = September 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rochester
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 53%
LTE Launched = February 21, 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = January 2014

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richmond
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 97%

LTE Sites Accepted = 73%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = October 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southern Virginia
Status:  NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 92%

LTE Sites Accepted = 15%
Anticipated LTE Launch = Q4 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = November 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swiftel (Sprint Affiliate)
Status:  Planning
NV Sites Accepted = 0%

LTE Sites Accepted = 0%
Anticipated LTE Launch = TBD

Original Scheduled Completion = Unknown
Current Production Rate Completion = TBD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panhandle
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 81%
LTE Launched = October 31, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toledo
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 72%
LTE Launched = April 29, 2014 (Findlay launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = April 2014

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upper Central Valley
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 70%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Red Bluff launched 10/2013, Reno/Sparks/Carson City launched 1/2014, Yuba City/Marysville launched 2/2014, Modesto/Turlock launched 4/2014, Eureka/Redding 7/2014, Sacramento/Stockton launched 9/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = September 2014

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • As far as I know it's ubiquitous. Ultimately the network decides if you should use VoNR vs VoLTE but pretty much anytime my phone is in standalone mode and I place a call, it goes over NR.   Yup, it was terrible. After a while, I just connected to the WiFi, and that worked fine at about 90Mbps. I get the feeling that rather than doing a "real" upgrade where they install new antennas, upgrade backhaul, etc., T-Mobile instead installed new radios onto the existing and already overloaded DAS and called it a day, which isn't enough. Compared to Yankee Stadium, where they actually went and deployed new antennas/radios for their n41 upgrade, and you're able to get upwards of 200Mbps at sold-out games, Arthur Ashe really is a joke. What's worse is that the folks in their NOC likely know this already, but no effort is being made to change that. I'm not asking for T-Mobile to deploy mmWave everywhere like Verizon but there is a real use case for it at stadiums.
    • Does anyone know how well implemented is VoNR in the 5 boroughs. Does anyone use it? I have an iPhone 15 Pro. Does anyone know if T-Mobile is still working on upgrading their network? It seems like the service has gone down. My phone struggles in parts of the Belt Pkwy, and data is slow. 
    • I come to the US Open men’s semifinals and finals every year, and I’ve never been able to use my T-Mobile phone successfully. Usually AT&T is the top performer—good to hear Verizon has upped their game. 
    • One sector down, two more to go — — — — —  I was at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open today and the good news is that there is an n25/41 DAS setup throughout USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. From the "boardwalk" to the outdoor concession area, to inside the stadium; you connect to standalone n41 and n25 everywhere via oDAS and iDAS. The bad news is that in the actual stadium it's beyond useless. While I saw strong coverage as indicated by signal bars and I was able to make calls and send texts, there was no data throughput at all. Running a speed test failed 9 out of 10 times. The only time I got a speed test to work was by switching to LTE funnily enough or by using NSA 5G where the test would initiate via LTE and then n41 would kick in giving me ~20Mbps. T-Mobile has so much traffic on their 5G network that now n41 gets bogged down before LTE. That was a first for me! In the stadium in the same area Verizon got 1.2Gbps on mmWave and LTE kept timing out when trying to test it. My Boost line on AT&T got upwards of 150Mbps on C-band and I know they have mmWave deployed as I saw their Nokia mmWave antennas deployed but I was unable to test it. In the outdoor concession area T-Mobile performed well getting over 150Mbps on n41. AT&T in these areas saw over 250Mbps on C-band and I didn't get the opportunity to test Verizon there. It just seems like 140MHz n41 is not enough capacity for the amount of people inside the stadium. Hopefully T-Mobile is considering deploying n258 to all of these stadiums since they now own that mmWave nationwide. It'd make a world of difference in terms of capacity at these venues. Bonus Pics: Verizon and AT&T mmWave Hidden carrier neutral DAS: 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...