Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market


abrcrmdl23

Recommended Posts

They were at the (not sure if I should say) site again so I decided to go over and talk to the guys. The guy I talked to was real nice and said he's been doing this stuff for 20 years. Here are a few points he made:

 

"It's going to be a rough 6 Months around here."

 

They are turning sites on in clusters because you'll get hard drops if you go from Motorola to the new Samsung hardware.

 

Lancaster is scheduled to turn on 7 sites September 9 but the other guy said there was a possible problem in that cluster.

 

Pickerington is getting worked on hard now as most of you know.

 

Backhaul is taking a while but some small towns are better prepared than you'd think.

 

He said the way the old wimax works if one tower has fiber it can feed many other towers and he was getting 100 mb somewhere the other day but they turn them down before going live.

 

Some of this may be old news.

Good stuff to know!

 

Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked up 800 on Lithopolis Rd on the way home from groveport. Even on my s2 wish I could prioritize it with all these dropped calls

That's new today. It was not broadcasting 800 the other day when I drove all around it. Let's call it a straggler. 

 

With all the 800 turned on in southeast Columbus & N/W Fairfield County, you should have 800 in the boxed areas on this map. It's pretty close to that from my experience. I didn't draw anything from West Jeff because I don't usually go around the southwest side. I did pick up West Jeff when I was on 104 @ Parsons once.

800cov.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clarify, the backhaul can run at 100Mbps+, but Sprint LTE 1900 cannot.  It is limited to 37.5Mbps download speed.  The airlink cannot support more than that.  A three sector site needs 100Mbps throughput in order to run three sectors running at their maximum speed.

 

Robert

Is it possible that he was talking about TD-LTE 2600?  Wondering if the rumors I have heard have any traction, just hearsay at this point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible that he was talking about TD-LTE 2600?  Wondering if the rumors I have heard have any traction, just hearsay at this point...

 

We have no confirmed TD-LTE 2600 work on Network Vision sites anywhere yet.  If our source is correct, it won't start on NV sites until the end of the year.  Currently, TD-LTE 2600 is being deployed only on Clearwire WiMax sites.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said the way the old wimax works if one tower has fiber it can feed many other towers and he was getting 100 mb somewhere the other day but they turn them down before going live.

 

To add one more thing to this. He was referring to feeding another tower by microwave. In Columbus, technically one site isn't feeding another site. When microwave backhaul is being sent from one site to another, it has it's own dedicated fiber Ethernet line and is not shared (daisy-chained) with the site isn't coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have no confirmed TD-LTE 2600 work on Network Vision sites anywhere yet.  If our source is correct, it won't start on NV sites until the end of the year.  Currently, TD-LTE 2600 is being deployed only on Clearwire WiMax sites.

 

Robert

 

Columbus does have a crap load of Clearwire WiMax sites, a lot co-located with Sprint, so it's possible we may be moving on those but I doubt that's what we was referring to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it has it's own dedicated fiber Ethernet line and is not shared (daisy-chained) with the site isn't coming from.

 

It often is a shared fiber connection at the source site.  But if it is running 1Gbps+, sharing isn't much of a problem.  :)

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbus does have a crap load of Clearwire WiMax sites, a lot co-located with Sprint, so it's possible we may be moving on those but I doubt that's what we was referring to.

 

It would still have to be a Clearwire contractor working on the Clearwire equipment.  Not a Network Vision subcontractor at this point.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would still have to be a Clearwire contractor working on the Clearwire equipment.  Not a Network Vision subcontractor at this point.

 

Robert

I should have been more clear.  I was talking about Clearwire equipment.  I see your point being that it would be a different subcontractor.  However, it is possible that a contractor received a contract for a couple of NV sites and a couple of WiMax sites, no?

 

Any information as to TD-LTE upgrades on existing Clearwire equipment?  I am curious as to what timeline we should expect for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would still have to be a Clearwire contractor working on the Clearwire equipment.  Not a Network Vision subcontractor at this point.

 

Robert

 

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last part of my post was not very accurate and not meant to confuse.  We were just kind of talking at that point and he was talking about 800 vs. 1900 and I brought up 2500 mhz.  That's when he started talking about getting 100 mb speeds and that was before tuning and adjusting.  I'm not exactly sure what he was talking about.  But what was very clear was that the next 6 months will be less than enjoyable... that they are turning sites on in clusters (maybe you already knew that)... and that Lancaster was almost ready to turn on 7 sites (not sure if they will have LTE - he didn't say).  

 

He said if you see the old cabinets and new cabinets both under a tower then it's probably still on the old stuff.  Once the Samsung cabinets are turned on they come and take away the old cabinets pretty soon.

 

Also - it takes a guy about 20 minutes to climb a tower... they rest half way up.  :-)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after I get back from Dallas next week, if I run into a crew, I'm going to ask if I can buy them a round or two of beers if I can ask them a few questions about how things are being done. Not necessarily time tables, but how things are being done.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realized why SCP has been chiming. It looks like Westerville has 800 online. This probably happened a week or more ago. There must be a bug because it was sounding the LTE chime all this time.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

 

post-18538-13782446892739_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just realized why SCP has been chiming. It looks like Westerville has 800 online. This probably happened a week or more ago. There must be a bug because it was sounding the LTE chime all this time.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

Looks like you may have attached the wrong screenshot as that one doesn't show 1x800.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after I get back from Dallas next week, if I run into a crew, I'm going to ask if I can buy them a round or two of beers if I can ask them a few questions about how things are being done. Not necessarily time tables, but how things are being done.

I offered Red Bulls but it was proprietary go figure

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like you may have attached the wrong screenshot as that one doesn't show 1x800.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

No, I just posted before realizing I was wrong. Sorry about that. But the eHRPD is progress at least. It alao seems to be causing the false alarms at any rate. I also saw the same in Coshocton today. They'll probably have 4G before here...

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I offered Red Bulls but it was proprietary go figure

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Hahahaha!

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I just posted before realizing I was wrong. Sorry about that. But the eHRPD is progress at least. It alao seems to be causing the false alarms at any rate. I also saw the same in Coshocton today. They'll probably have 4G before here...

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

You shouldn't receive false alarms. You may be picking up 800 from another site or your phone may even be receiving LTE and then quickly dropping.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You shouldn't receive false alarms. You may be picking up 800 from another site or your phone may even be receiving LTE and then quickly dropping.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

Damn, I just got really excited.  Almost to the point to make an appt. at the office this week.  Otherwise, I avoid that place like the plague, :D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You shouldn't receive false alarms. You may be picking up 800 from another site or your phone may even be receiving LTE and then quickly dropping.

 

Today's post has been brought to you by Sprint, the letters GN and the number 2.

Well its probably a trace signal then. Sorry at first I thought eHRPD meant 800 but I haven't seen that anywhere. In Coshocton the LTE alert I got was about 500 feet from the tower, but I got no connection. I see some purple on sensorly in dover/ new Philadelphia area, but that's pretty far. Maybe an unmapped tower out that way somewhere.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, just an update on the Dresden tower. I got a little more information today.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

How were the speeds?  That tower probably only has a max of like three people on it at once.  I would imagine the data would just FLY!

Thanks for taking a look.  You didn't by chance take a look at the other 4G tower just south of there, did you?  We still do not have confirmation that it in fact is LTE enabled yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How were the speeds? That tower probably only has a max of like three people on it at once. I would imagine the data would just FLY!

Thanks for taking a look. You didn't by chance take a look at the other 4G tower just south of there, did you? We still do not have confirmation that it in fact is LTE enabled yet.

I forgot to do a speed test, sorry about that. I don't think the other tower is enabled for LTE, because when I visit McDonalds, I am right in line of sight to that tower but I get no LTE. I could be wrong though.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to do a speed test, sorry about that. I don't think the other tower is enabled for LTE, because when I visit McDonalds, I am right in line of sight to that tower but I get no LTE. I could be wrong though.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 4

You are probably right, the tower north of Fredericktown has been 4G accepted since 8/2013 and still not a lick of 4G from the tower.  If you are out that way, I'd bet most of the sites in and around Zanesville are low hanging fruit.  It doesn't seem like there are too many people that check that area.  From what we've heard, it is going to start from the outside moving in.  You may be surprised with the progress on some of the towers already.  I was at an event on Saturday in Zanesville and had surprisingly usable Sprint service.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's new today. It was not broadcasting 800 the other day when I drove all around it. Let's call it a straggler. 

 

With all the 800 turned on in southeast Columbus & N/W Fairfield County, you should have 800 in the boxed areas on this map. It's pretty close to that from my experience. I didn't draw anything from West Jeff because I don't usually go around the southwest side. I did pick up West Jeff when I was on 104 @ Parsons once.

I was in Canal yesterday for the Labor day festival, I wasn't picking up any 800 at all, was kind of disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...