Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market


abrcrmdl23

Recommended Posts

My 800 tower is so inconsistent but Damn it has some range on it... I can pick it up around my house in Granville and also on 161, will drop the signal between 310 and Beech rd.

 

The thing though, never know when or if I'll pick it up, lucky I have signal check pro bc I would never know about 800 bc my EVO lte just picks it up and drops it at random. Prolly doesn't help not having backhaul yet on the tower.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 800 tower is so inconsistent but Damn it has some range on it... I can pick it up around my house in Granville and also on 161, will drop the signal between 310 and Beech rd. The thing though, never know when or if I'll pick it up, lucky I have signal check pro bc I would never know about 800 bc my EVO lte just picks it up and drops it at random. Prolly doesn't help not having backhaul yet on the tower. Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Uhm.... Hopefully this doesn't get me in trouble. But don't hold your breathe for additional 800 directly in Granville, besides the newly accepted site NE of downtown Granville. For the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummmm, no... We have 800 accepted tower in Granville already....

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

I'm picking up the 800 all the way from Granville!

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

My bad, I had to correct myself. Check the update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe thenight said the Columbus Rd tower is NV 3g/800 also. Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

I don't believe so. Not near future, but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty good stuff!

 

a2aqeje7.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

I wonder which tower you are connecting too... The tower right next to I-270 is the one I connect to at work and it has the same old coverage / speed.  In our building, I'm lucky to get one bar for most of the office.  I can't wait for 800 to get accepted on this tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder which tower you are connecting too... The tower right next to I-270 is the one I connect to at work and it has the same old coverage / speed.  In our building, I'm lucky to get one bar for most of the office.  I can't wait for 800 to get accepted on this tower.

 

I can get 2.2 mb on the old 3G on any tower. It just depends on how loaded that cell is at the time. One time it will be 2.5 mb, next time .3 mb. Also server load at the other end of the test affects output. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took a screen shot of received LTE while out on a walk in GC, near Old Haughn and Orders area:

 

wuyS9IIl.png

 

I'm not sure why it says Piketon, OH, as that's about an hour south of where I was.

Edited by cantcme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took a screen shot of received LTE while out on a walk in GC, near Old Haughn and Orders area:

 

Posted Image

 

I'm not sure why it says Piketon, OH, as that's about an hour south of where I was.

That's just the server the speed test app is using.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took a screen shot of received LTE while out on a walk in GC, near Old Haughn and Orders area:

 

wuyS9IIl.png

 

I'm not sure why it says Piketon, OH, as that's about an hour south of where I was.

Speeds probably pretty slow as it looks like on Sensorly, the LTE signal is pretty weak there. Note that your signal strength in that screenshot is of the 1X site you are also connected to, and does not represent your LTE signal strength.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did another tower go live?

 

Noticed on the Sensorely map that when going north of Morse it fades out, but there is now some pretty dark purple near on 71n right near where it hits 270 near westerville.  Then it stops of course, but still it goes from light signal to very strong signal right there.  Wonder if a tower in that area went live and it just hasn't been mapped yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did another tower go live?

 

Noticed on the Sensorely map that when going north of Morse it fades out, but there is now some pretty dark purple near on 71n right near where it hits 270 near westerville.  Then it stops of course, but still it goes from light signal to very strong signal right there.  Wonder if a tower in that area went live and it just hasn't been mapped yet.

Or it could be that a Galaxy Nexus polluted the results. I'm thinking it's that, given that right next to that dark purple it shows really low signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or it could be that a Galaxy Nexus polluted the results. I'm thinking it's that, given that right next to that dark purple it shows really low signal.

 

Does the Galaxy Nexus have a really strong antenna, or does sensorly not report signal strength properly on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the Galaxy Nexus have a really strong antenna, or does sensorly not report signal strength properly on it?

 

The GNex has a bad radio. Reports false information. It reports a really strong signal when it really has a weak one or no signal at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the Galaxy Nexus have a really strong antenna, or does sensorly not report signal strength properly on it?

 

Vice Versa the Nexus reports incorrectly, because it has bad EVERYTHING! ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now take back all those hurtful things that were said about our tender Galaxy Nexuses, COZisBack! My poor phone was crying itself to sleep. :)

 

/I still promise not to let it paint purple

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now take back all those hurtful things that were said about our tender Galaxy Nexuses, COZisBack! My poor phone was crying itself to sleep. :)

 

/I still promise not to let it paint purple

Hey, gotta call a spade a spade.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gnex is the best phone out there for Sprint minus the screen size and battery life.

 

Uhm.... Ok. Sure..... Whatever you say sir....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...