Jump to content

Pre-Launch Speeds for 4G LTE, Wimax and 3G according to Sprint


Recommended Posts

I received a communication from Sprint today linking me to a webpage about NV launch.

 

Below is one of their webpages indicating speeds for 4G LTE, Wimax and 3G after Network Vision is implemented.

 

Sprint states - "Expected speeds based on testing of deployed sites prior to network launch."

 

http://www.sprint.co...20808:LNL:B2C:T

 

Waiting patiently for SoCal. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got these speeds the other day.

 

1. AT 151st and Metcalfe, southern Overland Park

 

NhtOV.png

 

2. At blue ridge and 71 hwy in grandview.

 

 

wBNuK.png?1

 

 

NIce!!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received a communication from Sprint today linking me to a webpage about NV launch.

 

Below is one of their webpages indicating speeds for 4G LTE, Wimax and 3G after Network Vision is implemented.

 

Sprint states - "Expected speeds based on testing of deployed sites prior to network launch."

 

http://www.sprint.co...20808:LNL:B2C:T

 

Waiting patiently for SoCal. B)

 

It doesn't seem to be that old. It must have been published after LTE went live in Atlanta and the other cities in July 15th. Still useful info. Thanks for the post!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem to be that old. It must have been published after LTE went live in Atlanta and the other cities in July 15th. Still useful info. Thanks for the post!

 

This is the internet, anything more than 24 to maybe 48 hours max is considered old information. LOL, :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the internet, anything more than 24 to maybe 48 hours max is considered old information. LOL, :P

Yes and that's sad. It only speaks to our collective A.D.D. we all seem to suffer from in Westernized, developed nations. LOL. But I also think it unnecessary to from a negative post simply to put down someone else's and that was really my point. Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...