Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - San Antonio market


flyer8493

Recommended Posts

Houston is really thin with 1900mhz spectrum. Wish Sprint would have been able to grab some 1900mhz when AT&T bought out Cricket Wireless.

So is San Francisco, but they've managed to deploy a second B25 carrier with just 30 MHz of PCS+G bandwidth.

 

I think At&t held 60 MHz of PCS at one point in the greater Houston area. They've deployed one 20x20 LTE carrier, one 5x5 UMTS, and leased/sold (not sure which) the other 10 MHz to Verizon (Verizon only owned 10 MHz of PCS spectrum, but are now using one of At&t's blocks to deploy 10x10 LTE). I doubt they strike a deal with At&t since it looks like they're set for the long haul. T-Mobile owns the entire A block, so they're not going to accommodate Sprint either. Verizon is maxed out and moving would just acrew them over.

 

Sprint can't buy anymore spectrum down there. But they can thin out CDMA. Not sure why they haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone having service issues this morning? I'm showing a signal, but not able to make/receive calls, texts, or data. I've put my iPhone on wifi and it won't even switch over to WiFi-Connect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm restarting my phone at the moment. As of now I can't call, text, or get data unless I'm on wifi. My phone doesn't show that it's on WiFi-Connect, but after making and receiving test calls I can confirm that it is working. Once I switch off wifi, it all disconnects. After doing a reset, I am back to normal operations. That was weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I guess they're still tinkering with the cell sites in the area. I'm sitting on the second floor of my house with a stable -110 dbm band 41 signal while yesterday it was all over the place and in previous months it was only blips of B41. Luckily it's a 8t8r site with 3 carriers and that just pushed a speedtest to near 40 mbps down and 1 up. Once I get the MB it's going to do wonders for the vicinity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

1376b56329972f1de249c19a075fa431.png

Just wanted to see how sprint is doing in the San Antonio market .. looks like sprint has dropped the ball on upgrades in SA.. sprint started off really good and now fell off.. are the root reports equal to what any of you guys are experiencing ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1376b56329972f1de249c19a075fa431.png

Just wanted to see how sprint is doing in the San Antonio market .. looks like sprint has dropped the ball on upgrades in SA.. sprint started off really good and now fell off.. are the root reports equal to what any of you guys are experiencing ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The network isn't as bad as the report makes it seem. IMO, the Sprint network in San Antonio is better than the Houston network. A lot of work has been done to densify B41 and even more lies ahead through more small cells. Even areas without B41 hold up decently due to the second B25 carrier deployed a while back.

 

Sprint's biggest weakness is the South Side of town. It's not as populated as the north, so towers are oddly spaced. With data consumption growth in the past few years, the tower spacing caught up to Sprint very quickly. Terrible congestion and questionable indoor LTE reliability are common there. But like I said, the south side isn't very populated so it's not something most people will see.

 

Another questionable area is the hill country north of 1604. It's not unusual to drop to 1x from time to time. But to Sprint's credit, all carriers take some type of hit there as well. Not an easy part of town to cover, especially with the sprawl that keeps creeping into the hills.

 

I'm not going to apologise for Sprint, but the report could be very misleading. The San Antonio city limits go out very far into the country in each direction. Coming in from Corpus Christi, you still have a good 8-10 miles of rattle snake country after seeing the "SAN ANTONIO CITY LIMIT" sign. It is my understanding that root metrics drives around doing tests. So if they drove out into the city's "boonies", then it probably hurt Sprint more than the other carriers. Verizon and at&t have made these boonies a priority (O&G) and T-Mobile is expanding like crazy. For Sprint, the boonies just aren't a priority and it's actually understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely that upload speed is killing Sprint's score still. Overall the network has improved a bit since the last testing period. If you spend all your time downtown like most tourists it won't seem as bad as it appears. The rest of the scores most closely reflect the true experience, not that network speed test.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network isn't as bad as the report makes it seem. IMO, the Sprint network in San Antonio is better than the Houston network. A lot of work has been done to densify B41 and even more lies ahead through more small cells. Even areas without B41 hold up decently due to the second B25 carrier deployed a while back.

 

Sprint's biggest weakness is the South Side of town. It's not as populated as the north, so towers are oddly spaced. With data consumption growth in the past few years, the tower spacing caught up to Sprint very quickly. Terrible congestion and questionable indoor LTE reliability are common there. But like I said, the south side isn't very populated so it's not something most people will see.

 

Another questionable area is the hill country north of 1604. It's not unusual to drop to 1x from time to time. But to Sprint's credit, all carriers take some type of hit there as well. Not an easy part of town to cover, especially with the sprawl that keeps creeping into the hills.

 

I'm not going to apologise for Sprint, but the report could be very misleading. The San Antonio city limits go out very far into the country in each direction. Coming in from Corpus Christi, you still have a good 8-10 miles of rattle snake country after seeing the "SAN ANTONIO CITY LIMIT" sign. It is my understanding that root metrics drives around doing tests. So if they drove out into the city's "boonies", then it probably hurt Sprint more than the other carriers. Verizon and at&t have made these boonies a priority (O&G) and T-Mobile is expanding like crazy. For Sprint, the boonies just aren't a priority and it's actually understandable.

Great feedback . I was just wonder cause sprint used to be number 2 in network speeds with a score of 88

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Definitely that upload speed is killing Sprint's score still. Overall the network has improved a bit since the last testing period. If you spend all your time downtown like most tourists it won't seem as bad as it appears. The rest of the scores most closely reflect the true experience, not that network speed test.

Ya makes sense ! Do you happen to have another site to check the permits In El Paso the one permit site has been down for 2 weeks now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya makes sense ! Do you happen to have another site to check the permits In El Paso the one permit site has been down for 2 weeks now

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do not. That's the only one I know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Here is the tag on the pole.  No equipment on it yet. It just came up this evening, around 6 I'm told.
IMAG0323.thumb.jpg.19e4d6a227e8611f45c3626429106411.jpg
Nice find. Small cells are going up daily Spokane WA also getting lots of small cells... Looks like San Antonio is getting a big boost in speeds pretty soon

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the first sign I have seen of Sprint doing some physical work in San Antonio since a few permits that came through earlier in the year.  I tried looking for permits for this install, but I didn't find anything in the portal for either Sprint or Mobilitie.  This makes me wonder if Mobilitie has a subcontractor working this area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the first sign I have seen of Sprint doing some physical work in San Antonio since a few permits that came through earlier in the year.  I tried looking for permits for this install, but I didn't find anything in the portal for either Sprint or Mobilitie.  This makes me wonder if Mobilitie has a subcontractor working this area.
Same here ... Sprint just launched a new band 41 macro and I haven't been able to track a permit for it anywhere

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like the small cell I found a couple weeks ago is close to coming live.  It Needs a power meter, don't know if this will be a relay or if it will have a different type of backhaul.  Don't know much about small cells.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yYsqb51_yI9kbGZccxXqy9ds4j1laxDz/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/121fw6XrIBB3FW8jngwdQ0qa9xHw3tUWh/view?usp=sharing

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unrelated to Sprint, anybody here from San Antonio that uses Spectrum for their internet service?  The past few days my internet speed has gone up, damn near pulled 200 Mbps DL just a couple minutes ago.  150 Mbps last night.  I'm not complaining, I'm just wondering if they are changing their 100 Mbps tier to higher speeds or if I'm just getting lucky with this.  I haven't made any changes to my account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rackhivee said:

Unrelated to Sprint, anybody here from San Antonio that uses Spectrum for their internet service?  The past few days my internet speed has gone up, damn near pulled 200 Mbps DL just a couple minutes ago.  150 Mbps last night.  I'm not complaining, I'm just wondering if they are changing their 100 Mbps tier to higher speeds or if I'm just getting lucky with this.  I haven't made any changes to my account.

Charter has announced speed increases for several markets recently.  http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Leak-Heres-the-New-Charter-Gigabit-Markets-Launching-Next-Week-140899

This forum has actual results from users in those markets http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31733904-HSI-Charter-speed-increases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BucketHead25 said:

Charter has announced speed increases for several markets recently.  http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Leak-Heres-the-New-Charter-Gigabit-Markets-Launching-Next-Week-140899

This forum has actual results from users in those markets http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31733904-HSI-Charter-speed-increases

Well that explains it.  I'm actually impressed they upgraded their current customers without having us call in for the upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Sprint is beginning MMIMO (64T64R) Upgrades and Clearwire Conversions across town. Expect some minor disruptions across the area as conversion sites are basically NV rip and replace style with Clearwire equipment being removed, including microwave hops, and new equipment installed. Word is to push for an end of February deadline for conversion sites...my guess is likely for a March VoLTE launch goal

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The small cell in my neighborhood is getting close to having backhaul deployed now that ATT is bringing FTTH to the neighborhood.  The pole is right by the primary flex point and its handole.  Also saw them pull the main backhaul fiber from a handhole a block north from the small cell.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rackhivee said:

Also, on a separate note, my magic box is providing upload speeds I had never seen before from it.  Upwards of 6 mbps.  Is this a result of the 64 qam on uploads?

Potentially! They did advertise  "enhanced uplink connectivity" for their latest sw pdate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...