Jump to content

Question about signal strength after NV Upgrade...


Recommended Posts

Help me out if you will...

 

I live in Vero Beach, FL ... which is in the Orlando Market. I know that NV upgrades are coming in the near future but I have a few questions.

 

I have 3 towers near my house ... 2 miles, 2.5 miles and 3.5 miles away.

 

Inside my house I get between 0 - 2 bars of signal strength. I drop calls constantly if I move my head the wrong way. Me and my two kids all have EVO 4G phones. (Original EVO).

 

My download speeds tested with the speedtest.net app are between 30 - 150 kbps usually.

 

Now to my questions.

 

1. I have read that the signal strength should be stronger after NV upgrade ... do to the new radios and such ... Realistically how much stronger should I expect? If I am getting 0 - 2 bars now.

 

2. If my signal improves ... then I should stop dropping calls ....?

 

3. Testing the data rates side by side at the Sprint Store with my EVO and the 4G LTE (Galaxy s3 not there yet.)... my EVO was around 500kbps and the 4G LTE was usually over 1200kbps. I am looking to upgrade to the Galaxy S3... Do you think the new phone would perform better in my house currently? Maybe drop calls less?

 

Thank you in advance...

 

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me out if you will...

 

I live in Vero Beach, FL ... which is in the Orlando Market. I know that NV upgrades are coming in the near future but I have a few questions.

 

I have 3 towers near my house ... 2 miles, 2.5 miles and 3.5 miles away.

 

Inside my house I get between 0 - 2 bars of signal strength. I drop calls constantly if I move my head the wrong way. Me and my two kids all have EVO 4G phones. (Original EVO).

 

My download speeds tested with the speedtest.net app are between 30 - 150 kbps usually.

 

Now to my questions.

 

1. I have read that the signal strength should be stronger after NV upgrade ... do to the new radios and such ... Realistically how much stronger should I expect? If I am getting 0 - 2 bars now.

 

2. If my signal improves ... then I should stop dropping calls ....?

 

3. Testing the data rates side by side at the Sprint Store with my EVO and the 4G LTE (Galaxy s3 not there yet.)... my EVO was around 500kbps and the 4G LTE was usually over 1200kbps. I am looking to upgrade to the Galaxy S3... Do you think the new phone would perform better in my house currently? Maybe drop calls less?

 

Thank you in advance...

 

Gary

 

It is all about radio performance in your device. Network Vision sites will give you a 20% signal increase. So in the same device, it might be enough for a "one bar" improvement. You may notice a moderate improvement in voice performance, without dropped calls anymore. However, 3G data performance will be much better. And even with 3 bars of LTE signal, you should have screaming fast speeds compared to 3G.

 

But if you upgrade to a device that has a weaker radio than your EVO (like the Galaxy Nexus), then any improvement in NV signal will be negated by the weaker radio. We are planning a radio performance comparison article next week.

 

However, I will say this, if the nearest site is two miles away, and you live in a block home (like most Floridians) then that is most likely your problem. CMU (cinder block) and concrete and stucco are not good for a PCS signal...especially at 2+ miles. If this is your case, you will not get a lot of relief until Sprint depolys 800MHz service in your area. Sprint is deploying 800 service in two waves...CDMA 800 (voice) will be deployed first and is starting this Fall. LTE 800 will not start deployment until the second half of 2013. We do not have any specific dates yet on 800 deployments. And you would need to have an 800 capable device.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With your closest sites that far away and somewhat equidistant, you probably should not rely on unassisted wireless for inside coverage at your house, neither before nor after Network Vision. Use a landline or get an Airave (IP backhaul femtocell).

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an article we wrote with info about getting a free Sprint femtocell (Airave) for your home: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-88-sprint-has-a-new-airave-product-out-that-are-free-to-customers-with-indoor-coverage-problems/

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me out if you will...

 

I live in Vero Beach, FL ... which is in the Orlando Market. I know that NV upgrades are coming in the near future but I have a few questions.

 

Hah, I was born in Vero and lived there until I was 16. Your question has been answered but I wanted to say hello to my hurricane buddies in FL.

 

P.S. these Dallas Texans don't know what rain is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an article we wrote with info about getting a free Sprint femtocell (Airave) for your home: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-88-sprint-has-a-new-airave-product-out-that-are-free-to-customers-with-indoor-coverage-problems/

 

Robert

 

Robert, any word on the various text messaging troubles when using the Airave? I've heard about a lot of problems with notifications, texts, voice mails, etc so I've been reluctant to try it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, any word on the various text messaging troubles when using the Airave? I've heard about a lot of problems with notifications, texts, voice mails, etc so I've been reluctant to try it.

 

I hear mixed results. I hear some people say they have no problems and others complain. It seems like the people with the most problems are within coverage areas, but use the Airave out of convenience. It seems like people who live completely out of coverage or in very poor coverage areas do not have issues. I'm certain someone will come in here and disagree with me, but this is the common denominator I've noticed. Since Sprint gives them out for free, no harm in trying it out.

 

I love my Airave. It's 250' tall and in my front yard. :)

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried the Airave ... Sprint sent me one and was worse ... I have Comcast Internet ... 30mb down and 5 mb up ... the calls would get garbled ... not constantly ... however enough so that it was worse than not moving my head too much to keep from dropping a call ... :-)

 

Thanks all and Robert ... yes I have a Stucco house. Stucco over frame.

 

Xenadu ... Greetings back ... have lived here since 90 .... grew up in Ft. Pierce though ... Hopefully we will dodge most of the hurricanes this year too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried the Airave ... Sprint sent me one and was worse ... I have Comcast Internet ... 30mb down and 5 mb up ... the calls would get garbled ... not constantly ... however enough so that it was worse than not moving my head too much to keep from dropping a call ... :-)

 

If you used an older Airave, you may want to try one of the new ones.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried the Airave ... Sprint sent me one and was worse ... I have Comcast Internet ... 30mb down and 5 mb up ... the calls would get garbled ... not constantly ... however enough so that it was worse than not moving my head too much to keep from dropping a call ... :-)

 

Thanks all and Robert ... yes I have a Stucco house. Stucco over frame.

 

Xenadu ... Greetings back ... have lived here since 90 .... grew up in Ft. Pierce though ... Hopefully we will dodge most of the hurricanes this year too...

 

Yeah my grandmother lived in Ft. Pierce. We lived in Lakewood Park for a time. We were lucky, never had a major hurricane hit directly while we were there, but still had to haul out the plywood to board up, stock the batteries & food, etc.

 

 

Tried to give the number a call but they are only open M-F 9-9 CST. I will try again on Monday... Guess I can always unplug it if it makes things worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived in Florida for 7 years. I don't miss it one bit. I like to visit...in the Winter only. B)

 

I melt at 85 degrees. That's why I live in the mountains now. :) People in Florida always told me I would get used to the heat and humidity. And I never did. Because I always knew there was somewhere cooler in the summer.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert ... brand new ... made in March of this year ... Sprint sent it to me when I called and complained about dropped calls. Thought it was a great idea ... I have a Magicjack ... and it works great. However didn't have as good of luck with the Airave.

 

I moved the car today .... the temp was 103 sitting out on the sun... a little toasty.... :-)

 

 

Xenadu .... Lakewood park is 2.5 miles from me ... that is where one of my towers are ....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I hear mixed results. I hear some people say they have no problems and others complain. It seems like the people with the most problems are within coverage areas, but use the Airave out of convenience. It seems like people who live completely out of coverage or in very poor coverage areas do not have issues. I'm certain someone will come in here and disagree with me, but this is the common denominator I've noticed. Since Sprint gives them out for free, no harm in trying it out.

 

I love my Airave. It's 250' tall and in my front yard. :)

 

Robert

I do have one and I live in fringe coverage area, texts are good most of the time, sometimes have to reboot the box to fix it.

Robert,I thought your tower was in your side yard??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...