Jump to content

Pattern of bad connections to legacy network sites with LTE phones?


Recommended Posts

I don't yet have an LTE-capable phone because I am keeping my powder dry for the moment. But I have been watching several forums lately, and notice an unexplained pattern:

 

Some end users of the EVO 4G LTE and Galaxy S III -- and I emphasize some -- report anecdotally what is typically described as "poor signal" when connecting to the legacy Sprint network They generally say that a certain location they used to get good connections and displayed "bars" on their previous handsets, but the LTE-capable models show weak signal and might even kick into roaming mode.

 

Of course, this leads to some angry comments that "this phone radio sucks," etc. But I am not at all convinced that the antennas or radio sensitivity on these new phones are really the root cause, but rather suspect some interaction between the handsets and the network -- which may be running side-by-side with the NV network under construction. I am wondering what might account for this. For example, in certain areas could the phones not be playing well with a developmental NV tower whose signal is being broadcast but blocked, so the phone can't lock onto the legacy tower base station that it should be using? Or even being fooled by eHRPD upgrades as Robert suggests in this case.

 

Sprint surely is aware of these issues, but publicly is not saying much.

 

Note that this is a different case from the EVO 4G LTE anomaly reported here involving faulty connections to a live LTE test site. The case I am talking about is that of LTE-capable phones with bad connections to a legacy site.

 

Ideas? What should such users do to isolate and troubleshoot the problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am planning a radio performance comparison article between three new LTE devices and three WiMax devices being tested in various strong signal and mid signal and edge of service conditions.

 

Robert via Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another naive theory: Could it simply be that in cases where the new NV network is installed side-by-side with the legacy network, blasting away but being blocked, the NV signal (or at least its pilot channel) is interference that clobbers the Ec/Io of the legacy tower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another naive theory: Could it simply be that in cases where the new NV network is installed side-by-side with the legacy network, blasting away but being blocked, the NV signal (or at least its pilot channel) is interference that clobbers the Ec/Io of the legacy tower?

 

Once a site has upgraded 3G equipment, the legacy equipment is turned off. The only thing being blocked from what I've read here is LTE, not 3G/EVDO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't yet have an LTE-capable phone because I am keeping my powder dry for the moment. But I have been watching several forums lately, and notice an unexplained pattern:

 

Some end users of the EVO 4G LTE and Galaxy S III -- and I emphasize some -- report anecdotally what is typically described as "poor signal" when connecting to the legacy Sprint network They generally say that a certain location they used to get good connections and displayed "bars" on their previous handsets, but the LTE-capable models show weak signal and might even kick into roaming mode.

 

Of course, this leads to some angry comments that "this phone radio sucks," etc. But I am not at all convinced that the antennas or radio sensitivity on these new phones are really the root cause, but rather suspect some interaction between the handsets and the network -- which may be running side-by-side with the NV network under construction. I am wondering what might account for this. For example, in certain areas could the phones not be playing well with a developmental NV tower whose signal is being broadcast but blocked, so the phone can't lock onto the legacy tower base station that it should be using? Or even being fooled by eHRPD upgrades as Robert suggests in this case.

 

Sprint surely is aware of these issues, but publicly is not saying much.

 

Note that this is a different case from the EVO 4G LTE anomaly reported here involving faulty connections to a live LTE test site. The case I am talking about is that of LTE-capable phones with bad connections to a legacy site.

 

Ideas? What should such users do to isolate and troubleshoot the problem?

 

I'm actually experiencing that on my EVO LTE it constantly loses signal then roams all day when I normally would have full signal. I'm missing phone calls and text messages too. I think it has something to do with the radio in the new EVO because everyone that I know that has one is talking about the same problems. I can't even call out all the time, I have to restart my device a lot just to make and receive calls. Its so sad because the phone is awesome and when it does work on 3G its much faster than my old EVO 3D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that as well on my Gnex. I was out for a drive this morning, and noticed poor signal in places that my Epic Touch would be fine. I'm referring to real dB differences.

 

Hopefully it's a fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that as well on my Gnex. I was out for a drive this morning' date=' and noticed poor signal in places that my Epic Touch would be fine. I'm referring to real dB differences.

 

Hopefully it's a fluke.[/quote']

 

I don't think it's a fluke. That's my observation as well. :(

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have generally the same service with my EVO LTE as I did with my Of EVO. I'm in San Antonio, maybe its a region specific issue? 3g speeds are faster than my wife's epic touch 4g.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • The Kendall/Kerr/Gillespie PCS swap is a very nice win-win for AT&T and T-Mobile. Means both of them will have a 20x20 PCS channel, though in exchange T-Mobile goes from 10x10 to 5x5 on one of their spectrum blocks. I figure AT&T will start running n2 DSS on that channel, as they have enough customers in those areas to need the capacity, while T-Mobile will probably just run B2 LTE, as once Auction 108 finally clears they'll have plenty of n41 to play with. Guessing we'll see the non-G-block 5x5 slice running n25, but it would get aggregated with n71 rather than n41 I figure as n71 will remain 20x20 there until the STA goes away (and maybe after that, as if T-Mobile gets 700 MHz as the result of VZW buying West Central Wireless's spectrum there's no reason to run LTE in 600). Which makes me think that the next move is T-Mobile trading 700A for the 5x5 of orphaned PCS (E block) to VZW once the WCW transaction closes, as that would give VZW 20x20 PCS in the area, and would give T-Mobile 700 MHz in an area where they have none. Then VZW can either trade 700B to T-Mobile as well in exchange for the AWS I block in those areas (gives T-Mobile 10x10 B12, gives VZW 15x15 B66) or they can cut a deal with AT&T to give AT&T 10x10 B12 (AT&T has the lower C block), but I'm not sure what that deal would be if trading like for like (vs. AT&T handing VZW their upper tiny slice of B5, giving VZW 15x15 to play with in that band post-WCW-acquisition). EDIT: Just looked at AWS spectrum again, and if AT&T would rather have 10x10 B12 than 2x 10x10 AWS, they could swap AWS-D for VZW's 700B block. That would give VZW 20x20 AWS, and would take AT&T down to 10x10 + 5x5...which they'd likely be fine with as they have 20x20 PCS, small cells in the busy areas, and as a result of the transaction three 10x10 chunks of spectrum in the area below 1 GHz. And if VZW traded 700A to T-Mobile for PCS-E VZW would have 20x20 PCS as well. Which is quite useful in an area that's macro-only for VZW and likely not dense enough for proper mobile usage of CBRS or C-Band (and an area where VZW doesn't even run DSS now).
    • Yeah, $250 credit for an S22 is awful. tbf last year they didn't have solid upgrade credits until mid-late April, which is when I paid $225 to swap my S21 for an S22. Happy to wait 'til then for that kind of deal, though I'll be annoyed at battery life in the mean time.
    • Miserable upgrade credits from Samsung this year unless you want to rely on carrier financing. Sticking with S22U for a while. 
    • So far we've documented close to 100 Sprint conversions in NYC with permits still rolling in and that's only what we've identified manually. Tons of sites get converted/updated without permits so there's potentially a lot more that we haven't spotted yet. There are also dozens of sites that are still broadcasting the keep PLMN, some have been decommissioned but historically the vast majority have been converted.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...