Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Swiftel Market (Sioux Falls/Sioux City/Brookings)


saxman

Recommended Posts

Wow, not bad on an educated guess. Off by one. :tu:

 

 

There are a few other known Swiftel sites in South Dakota, but they are all south of Sioux Falls in the Sioux City BTA, which is part of the Des Moines MTA.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a few other known Swiftel sites in South Dakota, but they are all south of Sioux Falls in the Sioux City BTA, which is part of the Des Moines MTA.

 

AJ

Yeah, I only stayed in the Sioux Falls/Brookings corridor on this trip. So I kept my guess to the number of sites in that area based on my observations.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, in Swiftel's 10 MHz disaggregation from Sprint, is it running two CDMA1X carriers and one EV-DO carrier, one CDMA1X carrier and two EV-DO carriers, or just one of each?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I only stayed in the Sioux Falls/Brookings corridor on this trip. So I kept my guess to the number of sites in that area based on my observations.

 

I will be interested to see if you find any new sites when you cross reference your observations with the known site coordinates.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, in Swiftel's 10 MHz disaggregation from Sprint, is it running two CDMA1X carriers and one EV-DO carrier, one CDMA1X carrier and two EV-DO carriers, or just one of each?

 

AJ

I didn't take screen shots of it. I was busy taking screen shots of the 1x addresses in Signal Check. In my view of the Engineering screens, I was always on the same channel for 1x and EVDO, everywhere. So, I don't know if it was coincidentally just handing off to the same channels or if there is just one of each at every site.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be interested to see if you find any new sites when you cross reference your observations with the known site coordinates.

 

AJ

Me too. I hope to add this to our maps this evening. I will be in the Sioux Falls/Sioux City corridor the July 25th weekend. Hopefully I'll have time to check some things out then.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't take screen shots of it. I was busy taking screen shots of the 1x addresses in Signal Check. In my view of the Engineering screens, I was always on the same channel for 1x and EVDO, everywhere. So, I don't know if it was coincidentally just handing off to the same channels or if there is just one of each at every site.

 

When you are back in the area, remember my airplane mode toggle method for EV-DO.  That is the fastest, easiest way to initiate a new data session with a new EV-DO carrier hash.

 

My bet, though, is that Swiftel has done just the bare minimum.  It has enough spectrum for only three CDMA2000 carriers.  For years, it likely operated with only a single CDMA1X carrier, then added just one EV-DO carrier.  We shall see.  But the wise configuration in this smartphone era would be one CDMA1X carrier and two EV-DO carriers.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have changed the name of the title since this really is the Swiftel thread.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the endgame here is that Sprint and Swiftel will renew their contract and Swiftel will probably twist Sprint's arm into paying for most of the upgrades.

 

Well, Sprint will have to do something because Swiftel has only 10 MHz of disaggregated spectrum.  It cannot do any upgrades on its own -- barring maybe 1.4 MHz FDD LTE.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Sprint will have to do something because Swiftel has only 10 MHz of disaggregated spectrum. It cannot do any upgrades on its own -- barring maybe 1.4 MHz FDD LTE.

 

AJ

That's good for what? 3.5G? Hard to call it 4G if they deployed that little bandwidth.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Sprint will have to do something because Swiftel has only 10 MHz of disaggregated spectrum.  It cannot do any upgrades on its own -- barring maybe 1.4 MHz FDD LTE.

 

AJ

What kind of handsets does Swiftel use? Rebranded Sprint handsets? because if they use Sprint handsets and then wait a year or two for upgrades, they could probably ditch EV-DO and run 1X and LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of handsets does Swiftel use? Rebranded Sprint handsets? because if they use Sprint handsets and then wait a year or two for upgrades, they could probably ditch EV-DO and run 1X and LTE

 

Swiftel uses Sprint devices.  Swiftel does not have their own stores.  They are branded Sprint. though owned and staffed by Swiftel.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be interested to see if you find any new sites when you cross reference your observations with the known site coordinates.

 

AJ

 

I have added Swiftel to the NV Sites Complete map tonight.  There was only one Brookings site and one Sioux Falls site added to the original list you had.  If you scan the map, you'll see that they have a pretty lean deployment.  Brookings is covered fairly well, and Sioux City is pretty good.  As well as the south side of Sioux Falls.  But the north side of Sioux Falls and rural areas are very poor.

 

Robert

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sioux City is pretty good.

It may have improved with OM03IP491 being 1x800 accepted since the last time I've driven it, but that coverage gap between Sprint's West Iowa/Nebraska territory and the Swiftel sites in Sioux City has always struck me as odd.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may have improved with OM03IP491 being 1x800 accepted since the last time I've driven it, but that coverage gap between Sprint's West Iowa/Nebraska territory and the Swiftel sites in Sioux City has always struck me as odd.

 

With CDMA 800 fired up on the first site in Minnesota, the transition from Sioux Falls area to Sprint in the Dakotas market worked well.  So they should set up a handoff to the West Iowa/Nebraska market too.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swiftel uses Sprint devices.  Swiftel does not have their own stores.  They are branded Sprint. though owned and staffed by Swiftel.

 

Robert

I figured but didn't want to assume. So then that means that most of their phones are probably LTE capable now, so they might be inclined to do as I suggested and ditch EV-DO when they upgrade their equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I created an account to jump in this.  I moved to Sioux Falls 6 years ago, and currently am still out here.  Yes, the network is that bad.  Yes, you can have a full data signal and not even know how slow it's running because you'll end with with nothing but "check your data connection" messages.  3G didn't exist out here until Nov of 2009.  At the time it was nice.. pulling 2mpbs or more sometimes for download speeds.  Then it went to hell.

 

Then a few years ago when the original Evo was released you couldn't buy one out here because of a dispute between Swiftel and Sprint (I was able to because my billing address is still Chicago area)  But after a year or something they figured that out.  

 

So now you can have the best phones on Sprint, and experience it on the worst network in the US.  If it weren't for Wifi, and my Airave, my m8 would be worthless. Hell, when my brother comes to visit, he has T Mobile, and in Sioux Falls they only have Edge, and he was able to do more than I was!

I've called to complain many times, but it doesn't help because this isn't my "home" market.  If you talk to Swiftel, you'll either get ignored, or if someone does respond about the network, you're told "6 months to be fixed/upgraded", but they've been saying that now for the past two years.  Hell, it was 3 "6 months" before 3G was even turned on!

 

I wish they could use the Nextel sites out here for Sprint.  When I moved here I had Nextel and my coverage was amazing.  Plus it covered a huge chunk of the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I created an account to jump in this.  I moved to Sioux Falls 6 years ago, and currently am still out here.  Yes, the network is that bad.  Yes, you can have a full data signal and not even know how slow it's running because you'll end with with nothing but "check your data connection" messages.  3G didn't exist out here until Nov of 2009.  At the time it was nice.. pulling 2mpbs or more sometimes for download speeds.  Then it went to hell.

 

Then a few years ago when the original Evo was released you couldn't buy one out here because of a dispute between Swiftel and Sprint (I was able to because my billing address is still Chicago area)  But after a year or something they figured that out.  

 

So now you can have the best phones on Sprint, and experience it on the worst network in the US.  If it weren't for Wifi, and my Airave, my m8 would be worthless. Hell, when my brother comes to visit, he has T Mobile, and in Sioux Falls they only have Edge, and he was able to do more than I was!

I've called to complain many times, but it doesn't help because this isn't my "home" market.  If you talk to Swiftel, you'll either get ignored, or if someone does respond about the network, you're told "6 months to be fixed/upgraded", but they've been saying that now for the past two years.  Hell, it was 3 "6 months" before 3G was even turned on!

 

I wish they could use the Nextel sites out here for Sprint.  When I moved here I had Nextel and my coverage was amazing.  Plus it covered a huge chunk of the state.

 

You're in a market that has extreme minimal Sprint native coverage. Even when Network Vision is complete there, it more than likely will not meet your needs. In this particular instance it may be smart for you to explore other providers instead of complaining about the service you receive through Sprint. Our own Robert (S4GRU) has admitted that service in SD is not sufficient for his necessities, so we don't expect another member of SD to say otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I created an account to jump in this.

 

There is no way I would be a Sprint customer in Sioux Falls.  It is that bad.  And since Swiftel is a government entity, they will likely never be given the kind of capital from the City of Brookings that would be needed to upgrade its network to current Sprint standards.  However, Sprint will have to build out at least some PCS G-Block in this BEA to meet FCC build out requirements.  

 

So the question then becomes, will Swiftel be reasonable and work with Sprint on a plan to upgrade to Network Vision standards and host LTE on Sprint's PCS G-Block, or does Sprint have to do something completely on its own just to meet FCC build out requirements?

 

I'm not sure what the cost is to Sprint to cancel their contract with Swiftel early, but it seems to me it may be worth it and just buildout Sprint on old iDEN sites in East River.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I created an account to jump in this.  I moved to Sioux Falls 6 years ago, and currently am still out here.  Yes, the network is that bad.

 

If you are a Sprint sub with a billing address in Chicago who is camping on Swiftel nearly full time, then you are largely bringing this upon yourself.  You are in no man's land.  Sprint cannot help you because you are on an affiliate network.  And Swiftel cannot help you because you are a Sprint sub.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK, I decided to stop at the Sprint/Swiftel store yesterday while in East River. I popped in the store on the West side of the city off Louise Avenue after picking up a tasty white chocolate mocha espresso milkshake from the adjacent Coffeea Roasterie (highly recommend).

 

I figured I'd stop in and chat with the manager, which I just knew in advance would be a waste of time. But, being a Swiftel employee, I figured was worth a shot.

 

I asked to speak with a manager, and he said he was the manager on duty. I asked him if he was a Swiftel employee. He said he was but was wondering why I was inquiring.

 

I explained I ran a Sprint blog and was looking for any info regarding Swiftel's upgrade to LTE. And if he had any info. He sighed and said, that they have resorted to giving up telling customers about LTE. He said they basically don't sign up new customers anymore. They pretty much just service the unfortunate Sprint subscribers who move into the area from other places.

 

He said, as he understands it, Swiftel wants to sign a 15 year agreement extension in order to commit to the $180M upgrade they would have to do to upgrade to Network Vision and add all the LTE bands. He said since Swiftel is owned by a government agency, they would have to sell bonds to get money for the work. And most bonds require backing a 15 or 30 years of guaranteed revenues. 30 years is best to get good rates, but 15 years is pretty much the minimum based on their ratings and bond capacity.

 

He said, Sprint is willing to extend their agreement beyond 2018. But only an additional four years. He said this has created a stalemate. Swiftel cannot move forward with a four year agreement and get the funding they need. He has heard no further progress on discussions.

 

He said either the City of Brookings will try to sell Swiftel's wireless division (again), they will ride out the agreement until 2018 and Sprint will dump them, or Sprint will carry the debt for Swiftel and pay to upgrade themselves. And even if Sprint does pay for the upgrade themselves, it would be difficult for Swiftel, because that is a de facto loan, and would count against the City of Brookings bond capacity.

 

To me, it seems Sprint should buy Swiftel. If not, just pay off Swiftel the remainder of their profits on the 2018 agreement, cancel the agreement and overbuild using iDEN and Clearwire sites. And additional sites as needed. Having an affiliate who is a government agency is just not worth the trouble.

 

On another note, I highly recommend Bob's Cafe in Sioux Falls off 12th Street. Some of the best fried chicken I've ever had. Definitely a top ten. And that is saying something coming from me!!

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...