Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE Deployment Running List


Recommended Posts

West Iowa/Nebraska
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 77%
LTE Launched = March 17, 2014 (Lincoln launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Complete = April 2014

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Kentucky
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 98%

LTE Sites Accepted = 90%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Elizabethtown launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantial Completion = July 2014

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Texas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 96%

LTE Sites Accepted = 67%
LTE Launched = September 16, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = January 2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alabama

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 97%

LTE Sites Accepted = 55%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Anniston/Oxford/Montgomery launched 9/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = May 2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Albuquerque
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Under Way
NV Sites Accepted = 88%

LTE Sites Accepted = 42%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Clovis launched 10/2013, El Paso 12/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = August 2015

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arkansas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues

NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 55%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Ft. Smith launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014

Complete = March 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 76%
LTE Launched = July 30, 2014 (Jamestown/Dunkirk launched 12/2013, Olean 1/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = May 2014

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cincinnati

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 93%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Greenville/Springfield launched 1/2014, Dayton launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = August 2014

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbus
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 90%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Marion launched 1/2014, Zanesville 3/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = August 2014

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

East Texas
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 98%

LTE Sites Accepted = 78%
LTE Launched = October 31, 2013 (Nacogdoches launched 7/2013, Longview/Lufkin/Ruston launched 9/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantially Complete = March 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawaii
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Completing

NV Sites Accepted = 94%

LTE Sites Accepted = 51%
LTE Launched = February 19, 2015

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = June 2015

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisiana
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 96%

LTE Sites Accepted = 75%
LTE Launched = September 16, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lower Central Valley
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99.6%

LTE Sites Accepted = 60%
LTE Launched = February 19, 2015 (Bakersfield/Visalia/Porterville launched 3/2014, Madera/Chowchilla launched 4/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = October 2014

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mississippi

Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 48%
LTE Launched = January 27, 2014 (Greenville launched 9/2013, Laurel/Picayune 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014

Substantial Completion = March 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Northern Connecticut
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 63%
LTE Launched = June 23, 2014 (Willamantic launched 3/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = December 2014

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

North LA
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Under Way
NV Sites Accepted = 89%

LTE Sites Accepted = 46%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (San Luis Obispo/Paso Robles launched 6/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = June 2015

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

North Wisconsin
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 71%
LTE Launched = December 15, 2013 (Fond du Lac launched 6/2013, Wausau launched 7/2013, Sheboygan/Wisconsin Rapids launched 9/2013, Stevens Point launched 10/2013)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q1 2014
Substantial Completion = January 2014

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Tunnel Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 61%
LTE Launched = July 30, 2014 (New Castle launched 1/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = September 2014

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rochester
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 53%
LTE Launched = February 21, 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = January 2014

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richmond
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/LTE Deployment Continues
NV Sites Accepted = 97%

LTE Sites Accepted = 73%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = October 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southern Virginia
Status:  NV Upgrades Completing
NV Sites Accepted = 92%

LTE Sites Accepted = 15%
Anticipated LTE Launch = Q4 2014

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Current Production Rate Completion = November 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swiftel (Sprint Affiliate)
Status:  Planning
NV Sites Accepted = 0%

LTE Sites Accepted = 0%
Anticipated LTE Launch = TBD

Original Scheduled Completion = Unknown
Current Production Rate Completion = TBD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panhandle
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining
NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 81%
LTE Launched = October 31, 2013

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = May 2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toledo
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Complete/LTE Upgrades Continuing
NV Sites Accepted = 100%

LTE Sites Accepted = 72%
LTE Launched = April 29, 2014 (Findlay launched 2/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Complete = April 2014

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upper Central Valley
Status:  LTE Launched/NV Upgrades Substantially Complete/Difficult Sites Remaining

NV Sites Accepted = 99%

LTE Sites Accepted = 70%
LTE Launched = September 9, 2014 (Red Bluff launched 10/2013, Reno/Sparks/Carson City launched 1/2014, Yuba City/Marysville launched 2/2014, Modesto/Turlock launched 4/2014, Eureka/Redding 7/2014, Sacramento/Stockton launched 9/2014)

Original Scheduled Completion = Q2 2014
Substantial Completion = September 2014

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...