Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

Anyone know what is going on with Sprint in downtown Boston (specifically Boston Common).

 

3G was out all day right in front of the state house - stuck on 1x only. Other areas around are fine, seems like the 3G at that one tower went out.

 

Not sure if it is network vision related, thunderstorm related (from last night), or something else. Usually 3G speeds are very good in this area.

 

 

I need a bit more than this to stream my radio in the morning:

 

 

Holy moly! "Martha, I think the well done run dry!!!"

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what is going on with Sprint in downtown Boston (specifically Boston Common).

 

3G was out all day right in front of the state house - stuck on 1x only. Other areas around are fine, seems like the 3G at that one tower went out.

 

Not sure if it is network vision related, thunderstorm related (from last night), or something else. Usually 3G speeds are very good in this area.

 

 

I need a bit more than this to stream my radio in the morning:

 

 

Same thing happening to me today. I am sitting at the corner of State St. and Congress St., and according to Netmonitor, I am bouncing between towers with BID 864 (Post Office Sq/Kilby St. and Milk St.) and 608 (Broad St. and Franklin St.), each with terrible 1X data rates.

 

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

 

I have found that the lat/lon coordinates reported in Netmonitor can be very flaky. In my area, Netmonitor reports two towers at least a couple of miles apart with close BID numbers. And Netmonitor's log screen color-coded these sites Blue, which is supposed to mean that the towers themselves are squawking their coordinates. But I went looking for them yesterday (in a residential neighborhood) and could find no towers whatsoever near those coordinates. There is a big tower site roughly halfway between them on a north-south line, but offset a bit to the west, which does appear on the S4GRU maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Minnesota, and my 3G was out from 12:00pm-7:00pm CST. I called support about 1:00pm, and they thought the outage was only affecting new subs, but clearly it was more wide spread. I was hoping it was an backhaul upgrade that everyone is talking about, but I'm not too sure yet.

One thing that I've noticed, is I get better signal strength at work (1/2 mile from tower), but slower data speeds. At home, which is about 2 miles from the tower, I get a lower signal strength, but faster data speeds (200-500kbps download, and sometimes 300-600kbps upload). We're a small town, and I think they only have one tower. Could the 3G connection come from a different source/tower, than the voice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live in Minnesota, and my 3G was out from 12:00pm-7:00pm CST. I called support about 1:00pm, and they thought the outage was only affecting new subs, but clearly it was more wide spread. I was hoping it was an backhaul upgrade that everyone is talking about, but I'm not too sure yet.

One thing that I've noticed, is I get better signal strength at work (1/2 mile from tower), but slower data speeds. At home, which is about 2 miles from the tower, I get a lower signal strength, but faster data speeds (200-500kbps download, and sometimes 300-600kbps upload). We're a small town, and I think they only have one tower. Could the 3G connection come from a different source/tower, than the voice?

 

It's unlikely but possible. There are only a few towers left in Minnesota that don't have 3G EVDO on them so it is likely that your 3G is still coming from the same tower as voice is. What is your zip code?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The zip code is 56093, Waseca. I just did tests this morning and I got 1300kbps download, and 263kbps upload at work. I did it 10 secs later from the same spot and got 360kbps download and 103kbps upload. So you're probably right. It's very inconsistant though. The tower is located on the south side of town on Hwy 13 (MS03NP137 I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing happening to me today. I am sitting at the corner of State St. and Congress St., and according to Netmonitor, I am bouncing between towers with BID 864 (Post Office Sq/Kilby St. and Milk St.) and 608 (Broad St. and Franklin St.), each with terrible 1X data rates.

 

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

 

Well, fingers crossed they are actually working on our towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The zip code is 56093, Waseca. I just did tests this morning and I got 1300kbps download, and 263kbps upload at work. I did it 10 secs later from the same spot and got 360kbps download and 103kbps upload. So you're probably right. It's very inconsistant though. The tower is located on the south side of town on Hwy 13 (MS03NP137 I think).

 

There's only one tower in Waseca and if you get 3G at all then your tower definitely has 3G on it with the 1X voice. According the Sprint network website, you are getting a data capacity add in the next 6 months which is just another EV carrier being added but not a T1 backhaul. So this may mean the backhaul is sufficient right now but there are too many users on the current EV carrier so they are adding a new one. The variability in speedtests can be apparent because you're not the only user on a tower and someone could have just started loading facebook or a youtube video so your speeds aren't half bad if you're able to pull over 1200 kbps at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised that I got that 1200kbps too, I did the same test after work and it was only 80kbps. I was at a soccer game in Prior Lake tonight, and got around 150kbps, Mankato has horrible speeds too. I hope Sprint is commited in changing things around in southern Minnesota. I guess Verizon is very close to having LTE here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised that I got that 1200kbps too' date=' I did the same test after work and it was only 80kbps. I was at a soccer game in Prior Lake tonight, and got around 150kbps, Mankato has horrible speeds too. I hope Sprint is commited in changing things around in southern Minnesota. I guess Verizon is very close to having LTE here.[/quote']

 

They are upgrading every last tower in the market.

 

Sent from my Jelly Bean Toro using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reading the minutes of the Waltham city counsel meeting and sprint applied for 2 permits to work upgrade sites. I can see that one was approved. Glad its the one close to me. Hopefully this is another sign that NV and LTE are coming my way.

 

Here is the Special permit application

 

 

Sprint, 1 International Blvd, Mahwah, NJ 0745 and Pinnacle Towers, Inc. Sarasota, FL. hereby

petition the Waltham City Council for a special permit pursuant to Sections 3.512, 3.621, and

10.56 of the City of Waltham Zoning Ordinance, to modify, operate and upgrade a wireless

communication facility on the existing building located on the property located at 39

Sachem Street (Atlas Map R0033, Block 001, Parcel 0005), including replacing three (3)

wireless antenna with (6) wireless antennas mounted to the Lattice Tower and painted to match

same. The Petitioners also propose to replace two (2) ancillary cabinets with two (2) new cabinets locates on existing steel dunnage, install nine (9) RRH mounted to the wireless

antenna on the tower, install one (1) Fiber Distributions Box mounted to ice bridge supports.

Replace a small Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna, which is necessary for E911

compliance. The proposal is shown on the Plans submitted by the Petitioners, which are

incorporated herein by reference.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant to post this last week and forgot. Took a trip to the Burlington Mall on Thursday and just before leaving to head back home, I remembered that there has been some LTE work done nearby. So, I put my new SGS3 into LTE mode and.... no LTE signal. However, a speedtest of the 3g signal was really good. around 1.6 down 0.9 up. Way better than I've come to expect over the last year. Yay NV! Can't wait until it arrives closer to home.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing happening to me today. I am sitting at the corner of State St. and Congress St., and according to Netmonitor, I am bouncing between towers with BID 864 (Post Office Sq/Kilby St. and Milk St.) and 608 (Broad St. and Franklin St.), each with terrible 1X data rates.

 

It is hard for me to map the Netmonitor towers to sites on the Sponor maps since I only see one NV site in this area on the Sponsor map (BS54XC906, Broad St. and MIlk St., which I assume is BID 608). If this is the case, then tower with BID 864 does not even appear on the NV maps.

 

This is happening to me again today on my EVO 4G LTE. I am being bounced around several towers in downtown Boston (near State and Congress), all of which are providing painfully slow data speeds (.12 down, .33 up). I hope this means they are working on the sites.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

so I found this tower that is supposedly broadcasting 3G/4G, located downtown at Quincy Market.

 

7636507670_cc1ce6c1bf_c.jpg

7636506042_6646ac3ecd_c.jpg

Sadly, 3G speeds were only so-so (600-1300kbps) and 4G was not to be found. I checked LTE record and nothing was there and no eHRPD available, just EVDO Rev A.

 

This is also the first Sprint network vision antenna I have seen without the RRU under it. Maybe they mounted it on the roof? Or maybe no RRU for this location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is happening to me again today on my EVO 4G LTE. I am being bounced around several towers in downtown Boston (near State and Congress), all of which are providing painfully slow data speeds (.12 down, .33 up). I hope this means they are working on the sites.

 

Many parts of Boston have really slowed down as of late. Pretty much all of downtown seems to have become just about unusable. Not sure what's going on... but it's become so slow, I can no longer stream radio, at all, which is annoying.

 

Personally, I would rather be annoyed for a month or two while they upgrade, but I am sure there are countless sprint users that have no idea why their experience is so horrible. I am just glad LTE is on the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so I found this tower that is supposedly broadcasting 3G/4G, located downtown at Quincy Market.

 

[pics removed]

 

Sadly, 3G speeds were only so-so (600-1300kbps) and 4G was not to be found. I checked LTE record and nothing was there and no eHRPD available, just EVDO Rev A.

 

This is also the first Sprint network vision antenna I have seen without the RRU under it. Maybe they mounted it on the roof? Or maybe no RRU for this location?

 

I walked over there yesterday as welll and stood right under the tower. I experienced similar so-so 3G speeds and 4G never connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I walked over there yesterday as welll and stood right under the tower. I experienced similar so-so 3G speeds and 4G never connected.

 

But if you walk up to cambridge street and hook onto Sprint's antennas above whole foods, you will hit 2mbit+ all day long. Even the antenna above the giant tea kettle at Government Center seems to perform really well.

 

I am guessing that the location at quincy market doesn't have new backhaul yet? Whatever is it, it was disappointing, heh.

 

 

Typical sprint speeds elsewhere in downtown Boston:

7637711852_5eb75baefe.jpg

Took me about 8 tries before I could complete a speedtest. Speeds at this locations have been on a death spiral for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant to post this last week and forgot. Took a trip to the Burlington Mall on Thursday and just before leaving to head back home, I remembered that there has been some LTE work done nearby. So, I put my new SGS3 into LTE mode and.... no LTE signal. However, a speedtest of the 3g signal was really good. around 1.6 down 0.9 up. Way better than I've come to expect over the last year. Yay NV! Can't wait until it arrives closer to home.

 

Yup, the tower at the Burlington Mall is one of the better ones I've found. When I first activated my EVO LTE at the Sprint store there I was blown away with the speeds. However, the tower you're connecting to is BS13XC745, which is 3G only. The 4G tower is BS03XC011, which is on the other side of Lahey Clinic at the Marriott. Even when parked in the Marriott parking lot I haven't been able to connect to LTE, so you didn't miss much.

 

This is also the first Sprint network vision antenna I have seen without the RRU under it. Maybe they mounted it on the roof? Or maybe no RRU for this location?

 

I see two antennas in your pictures -- one white antenna mounted on the roof itself, and one brown one hanging over the side. Perhaps the one on the roof has an adjacent RUU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see two antennas in your pictures -- one white antenna mounted on the roof itself, and one brown one hanging over the side. Perhaps the one on the roof has an adjacent RUU.

 

Pretty sure it's not an antenna - just some sort of ventilation pipe.

 

Sorry for the horrible photos - just a quick grab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speeds in Boston have been really bad lately. Just dying for 4g to light up on my phone. it does suck that right now i can barely use the internet if im in or around Boston. Def looking at it as a good sign that LTE work is getting done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure it's not an antenna - just some sort of ventilation pipe.

 

Looking at Google Maps, the white things are definitely antennas. There are three of them, they're mounted on tripods (so they're not pipes), and they have black cables running to them:

 

Itdax.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at Google Maps, the white things are definitely antennas. There are three of them, they're mounted on tripods (so they're not pipes), and they have black cables running to them:

 

 

Nice, good catch

 

I wonder if those are for another carrier. The pic I took was definitely sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo! My mother just called me and asked why it keeps flashing 4g on her viper. She works in Lynn ma. Maybe it's testing or it coming live idk but confirmed LTE l! Also eHRPD in swampscott the other day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo! My mother just called me and asked why it keeps flashing 4g on her viper. She works in Lynn ma. Maybe it's testing or it coming live idk but confirmed LTE l! Also eHRPD in swampscott the other day.

 

Appreciate the update!

 

Still EVDO RevA in downtown Boston :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...