Jump to content

PedroDaGr8

S4GRU Sponsor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    715

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    47

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PedroDaGr8

  1. PedroDaGr8
    Ouch, if true, that means that SCP isn't calculating the gNB correctly for T-Mobile either. So all of the gNB online are incorrect. For example the Woodinvile Warehouse Site would have a gNB of 1864948 rather than 3729896.
  2. PedroDaGr8
    That 1024 number would be in line with 26-bits for the gNB. 10-bits = 1023 which including 0 equals 1024.
  3. PedroDaGr8
    Not as a neighboring cell, the information fully populates in SignalCheck (see image below), I just don't have a data connection. Furthermore, despite driving around for a while and seeing multiple n5-SA cells, nothing is available for upload Also, I'm still investigating the gNB. I thought all the Cell IDs for SignalCheck we're consistent: 1049/1073/1097 for n5-SA, 1050/1074/1098 for n2-SA, and 1051/1075/1099 for n66-SA. Said above image also shows a two digit Cell ID. It appears this is also a set 25/49/73 which are n5-SA. If it helps, device is a Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra running Android 11 (Nov. Security). I sent you a diagnostic report a week or so ago while seeing an AT&T cell. Edit: So I ran some calculations and it appears that CellMapper is using 24-bit gNB for AT&T, while SignalCheck is using a 25-bit gNB. Not sure which is correct yet since I can't find a screen to show me said info (my radio data doesn't populate since switching to a TMo sim). Edit2: Actually, using more NCI data from CellMapper, I think both SignalCheck and CellMapper are calculating gNB wrong. Based on the NCIs I have access to, if you use 26-29bits to calculate the gNB then you get a very consistent pattern for the Cell IDs: n5: 25/49/73 n2: 26/50/74 n66: 27/51/75 n78: 28/52/76
  4. PedroDaGr8
    There's no failure or error. Based on my testing today it appears that it never records the cells. I tested it today while driving around and despite seeing a dozen cells, nothing was recorded.
  5. PedroDaGr8
    Ignore what I said about the gNB, yours seems to be more consistent than CellMapper when it comes to the Sector IDs. My guess is they don't have the right number of bits set for the gNB. That being said, the sites still don't upload.
  6. PedroDaGr8
    Hi Mike, a question about gNBs to which you don't connect? I noticed if I band lock my phone to n5 or n66, I can see AT&T n5-SA and n66-SA bands. I can't connect to them but I can see them in CellMapper and in SignalCheck. That being said the IDs are different, the CellMapper gNB appears to match the eNBs in the area a bit closer than SignalCheck does (the first digit is the same). Additionally, the Signal check results don't upload while the CellMapper results do.
  7. PedroDaGr8
    FYI, if I lock my phone to n66, I can see AT&T n66-SA (same with n5-SA) but can't roam on it.
  8. PedroDaGr8
    Ok either some glitch in my phone cleared or they activated n41-SA on a bunch of towers for about 10min. I was heading home for lunch, forgetting I had my phone locked on n41 and suddenly I'm getting it everywhere. Places it never worked before (like home). Now it's back to not working. Edit: And heading back towards Woodinville it started again but only for some towers. Very strange
  9. PedroDaGr8
    Hah! By the way, do you have any idea why the new Woodinville Warehouse tower is the ONLY tower I have encountered where I can connect to n41-SA?
  10. PedroDaGr8
    That's a lot of towers in a small area again (4th, 8th, and 12th) but here the capacity makes a bit more sense
  11. PedroDaGr8
    FYI, it seems like the band listing in service mode is not accurate. My N20U has n41-SA missing as well but I just connected to n41-SA on a new tower that went live this morning.
  12. PedroDaGr8
    Dang I hate the short edit window on this site. The rest of the bands on the site all went live as well.
  13. PedroDaGr8
    Just connected to n41-SA for the first time, despite the service menu on my phone (N20U) only showing n41-NSA as an option.
  14. PedroDaGr8
    And just noticed the Woodinville Warehouse District site just went live. Strangely, it is only broadcasting 5G with no 4G signals live yet (band select forces me on towers which are much farther away). I'm guessing those will go live later in the day. Edit: and wow, I can connect to n41-SA despite my phone supposedly not supporting it (it doesn't show in the service menu)
  15. PedroDaGr8
    If I remember correctly, that site is broadcasting a Sprint KeepPLMN as well.
  16. PedroDaGr8
    I have a Samsung device (Android 11, November security update) and think I can replicate the issue. I'm not sure why but for some reason, I can't browse the ..\Android\data\folder from my phone; it just shows up as blank. This is true whether using the built in file browser or using SCP. The weird part: if I plug my phone into my computer then I can see all of the subfolders and files in ..\Android\data\ As such, my work around is to manually move the files to a location which I CAN see.
  17. PedroDaGr8
    Great to know
  18. PedroDaGr8
    Confirmed, B2/12/41/66/71 are on 505921 and B41 is on 506063. Have not seen this format of eNB in the Seattle area before. Usually when they split eNBs, it is because they have more than 3 sectors.
  19. PedroDaGr8
    Looks like the National Glass site went live broadcasting 311-490 PLMN and some strange split eNBs: 505921, 506063 for 4G and 4198118 for 5G. I'll investigate it more tomorrow to verify.
  20. PedroDaGr8
    Found a Dish permit in a pretty suburban/semi-rural area (Woodinville, WA). They must be making pretty good progress to be reaching areas like Woodinville. https://aca-prod.accela.com/WOODINVILLE/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=BLD21&capID2=00000&capID3=00611&agencyCode=WOODINVILLE&IsToShowInspection=
  21. PedroDaGr8
    I'm interested to see what you figure out. That area and the 85th St. Kirkland exit are getting absurd with tower density. For others, came across the first Dish permit for the Woodinville area. Looks like they will colo on the AT&T tower. https://aca-prod.accela.com/WOODINVILLE/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=BLD21&capID2=00000&capID3=00611&agencyCode=WOODINVILLE&IsToShowInspection=
  22. PedroDaGr8
    It appears T-Mobile is pushing forward with upgrading the Totem Lake Motel 6 site SMDH. I really hoped they would change their mind and scrap that site. Permit to replace the hardware: https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/BNR21-09062/Kirkland Permit to upgrade the site: https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/WIR21-00584/Kirkland
  23. PedroDaGr8
    Agreed, he did a great job and welcome back.
  24. PedroDaGr8
    Whelp, turns out the Woodinville National Glass site must have had a defective Nokia AEHC. When I drove by today, they were clearly replacing a panel. If you look closely you can see the worker on the TMobile rack.
  25. PedroDaGr8
    You would think they would have done extensive planning in advance when selecting to keep a site. Maybe that's being presumptuous.
×
×
  • Create New...