COZisBack

iPhone 6+ isn't the flagship device. Released/Announced same as iPhone 6. Z3 and Z3 Compact don't have same features. Z3 is built with better products and 1080p screen amongst others. If only one device is coming to the U.S. and being promoted by a manufacturer that's their Flagship. Better response?

Now you're scrapping the barrel for your argument now.

It's all tied together buddy. ???? Again, the compact is really really cool and may be the better overall value, but it's not the main flagship, no matter when Sony decided to announce/release it.

Can you walk into any of the Big 3 and buy a compact?

Do me a favor. Google Sony Flagship phone and tell me what pops up. And don't post the Verge article again. ????

You're totally missing what I'm saying.

Even so, take into account the name sake. As well as premium features.

The phone the manufacturer releases as their top presser for the year. If the compact was determined by them to be their flagship it wouldn't be called the Z3 Compact, it would be called the Z4 and it wouldn't have been released after the Z3. Look at every manufacture's Flagship phone. It always releases first and leads with a new name sake, not Mini, Sport, Maxx, Compact, Plus/+ or E8.

That's the Verge's opinion. Which I don't disagree with the compact maybe being a better suite but Sony doesn't consider the compact their flagship.

The Z3 Compact isn't the flagship device. The Z3 is. The same way the S5 Mini isn't a Flagship.

You're not going to find any flagship device sub 5 inch screen anymore. Unless there is a tech culture change. Edit: Minus iPhone.

New LTE Columbus

Doesn't have anything to do with safety. The WiFi radio shares the same path. Same reason why you don't have SVLTE/SVLTE on Tri-Band Devices. I haven't looked at HotSpot devices on the FCC, I'm sorry.

Model Name: Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Model Number: SM-N920P Processor: 2.7 GHz Quad-core Processor Display: Quad HD+ Super AMOLED 5.7 inches Quad HD+ Super AMOLED / 2560 x (1400+160)Cellular Bands: LTE Band 2 (PCS A-F) Band 4 (AWS) Band 5 (CLR 850) Band 12 (Lower 700 A-C) Band 25 (PCS A-G) Band 26 (ESMR 800 + CLR 850) Band 41 (BRS/EBS 2600) CDMA: Band Class 0 Band Class 1 Band Class 10 GSM/W-CDMA: GSM 850/1900 W-CDMA Bands 2/5 Wireless: 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi Bluetooth 4.1 wireless technology NFC Notes: Sprint Spark Sprint Direct Connect Now HD Voice Wi-Fi Calling Band 41 Carrier Aggregation certified Fully CCA/RRPP Compliant Currently no Sprint VoLTE capabilities No SVLTE (Spark devices don't support SVLTE) Link to Wall article. Link to Rumor thread. FCC Source: A3LSMG920P

Model: SM-N915P Processor: 2.7 GHz Quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 Display: Curved Quad HD Super AMOLED 5.6 inches / 1440 x 2560 / 524 PPI Sprint Cellular Bands: CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz) FDD-LTE (Bands 25, 26) TD-LTE (Bands 41) Wireless: 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi Bluetooth 4.1 wireless technology NFC Notes: Sprint Band 41 Carrier Aggregation Sprint Spark Sprint Direct Connect Now HD Voice Wi-Fi Calling Not Fully CCA/RRPP Compliant Currently no Sprint VoLTE capabilities No SVLTE (Spark devices don't support SVLTE)

Nope. I believe when I was looking through FCC docs for the Note 4 that it will not allow simultaneous broadcasting of both. I'm pretty sure that would be the same for the GS5.

That's currently the plan. Stay tuned.

Great. I'll update the article and this thread when I get back in town on Tuesday.

Enjoy! http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6409-samsung-galaxy-note-4-user-thread/

That would be because we like to stick to cellular capable devices. [emoji6]

Adjusted thread title as this will become the main thread.

I was about to say... I know a lot of us hate that damn symbol.

Is this a complaint or an observation?

You slipped on this one. We've been discussing this for about a week.

Please ask your questions in relevant threads instead of starting new ones.