Jump to content

Paynefanbro

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    5,365
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    216

Everything posted by Paynefanbro

  1. I literally have a pic of that same small cell that I took on Saturday lol. I couldn’t remember if anyone had already posted it or not.
  2. T‑Mobile Tops 3 Gbps with World’s First Standalone 5G Carrier Aggregation Achievement
  3. Keep PLMN is broadcasting on eNB 896562 in Jamaica Queens. Location: 40.70607685304306, -73.8065914654994
  4. I was checking out street view and came across this small cell in Breezy Point. Looks like it has been there since at least 2019. I wonder what carrier it is?
  5. You have no idea how much this is gonna help me going forward. I took a look around streetview at sites where I already knew the carrier and your descriptions map perfectly. T-Mobile has that deal with Crown Castle to upgrade something like 30,000 small cells nationwide. My best guess is that not adding the omnidirectional antenna was just them planning ahead for when they'd need to add midband 5G along with the shroud on top of them.
  6. T-Mobile n77 permit in Los Angeles Neville stated last week that n77 deployment would start in 2023 with a capacity-driven approach meaning the sites that need it most would get C-band and DoD spectrum first. Looks like it's starting earlier than anticipated. Neville has also stated in the past that T-Mobile would be waiting on a 2-in-1 that would allow them to broadcast C-band and DoD spectrum through a single antenna. I wonder why they chose to just deploy C-band separately here.
  7. Confirmed keep sites: T-Mobile eNB 880422 (40.771888512069, -73.95341047716771) T-Mobile eNB 875262 (40.770453233497975, -73.96166537108597) — — — — — Turns out you don't need the little antenna on the top lol. This site hasn't had one since it was built out last summer. I was seeing 5CA for a total of 100MHz of spectrum from this small cell. Band 2 + Band 66 + 3 x Band 46. Speeds weren't that impressive but it does fill in a coverage hole so it's likely acting as a mini-macro for that block. — — — — — I also wanted to say that AT&T's C-band deployment is moving insanely fast. I kept spotting Nokia n77 antennas all over the place. I'd guess that they probably have a larger C-band footprint in Manhattan than Verizon at this point. It's too bad they haven't started DoD spectrum deployment yet. It'd give them an immediate boost over Verizon in the near term though from what I'm seeing on Cellmapper, they aren't exactly lacking in the speed department. They're aggregating 40MHz of LTE with 40MHz of n77 on average and getting peak speeds comparable to T-Mobile and Verizon. Loving this competition!
  8. T-Mobile sure hopes no one notices any difference with 5G VoNR Looks like T-Mobile is done beefing up their LTE network. Now that CDMA is gone they're gonna use that 5MHz of spectrum for n25.
  9. Saw a new Extenet small cell in Cobble Hill on Van Brunt but didn't stop for a pic. I also saw this Extenet small cell while driving through Ridgewood two weeks ago. I also visited the Mobilitie small cell in Harlem that was posted on Reddit over a month ago but didn't get anything from T-Mobile so I'm not certain who is on it or if it's even live.
  10. Looks like T-Mobile is shifting the focus of their network expansion from just trying to hit POP targets to actually covering as many square miles as Verizon. From T-Mobile CEO dishes on 5G enterprise, ‘torture test’ coverage goals
  11. Both Jersey City and Newark are part of the North Jersey market but I think it’s fair to add them to the map considering that they’re closer to NYC than some of the keep sites that actually are part of the NYC market like the one I found in Middletown. Edit: While we're at it, here are 3 keep sites in the North Jersey market I found: T-Mobile eNB 894946 (40.76025066066227, -74.02319905031857) T-Mobile eNB 874734 (40.88430199578836, -74.0689136045038) T-Mobile eNB 875135 (40.87580324171812, -74.06612743737007) — — — — — Also found a new-build in Tenafly a while back but I don't know if we want to keep track of those too. T-Mobile eNB 891761 (40.92481567639597, -73.96686971744198)
  12. More confirmations incoming! T-Mobile eNB 880561 (40.74176835140717, -73.88364207139453) Sprint eNB 6191 / T-Mobile eNB 880065 (40.71339007010928, -73.85695387371624) Confirmed this site but was unable to get a photo because the antennas are set back from the edge of the building. I could see them from super far away but there wasn't a good area for me to pull over and snap a pic. Sprint eNB 6189 / T-Mobile eNB 877995 (40.71183894845567, -73.83529788316665) Sprint eNB 253741 / T-Mobile eNB 875537/875538 (40.70170960850086,-73.83302208208359) Sprint eNB 79912 / T-Mobile eNB 875989 (40.86349197342981, -73.923456682535) — — — — — T-Mobile eNB 880536 in the Bronx isn't a Sprint conversion, instead it looks like T-Mobile changed the eNB ID when they upgraded the site. The nearest Sprint site at 40.8150405321864, -73.93010756429787 still has all of its antennas up and is literally within spitting distance of two other T-Mobile sites in an area that's very industrial as opposed to residential or commercial so a keep site isn't particularly necessary. You can see on Cellmapper that the old eNB stopped broadcasting about two days after the new eNB went live. — — — — — Also wanted to add that I spotted AT&T C-band antennas quite a bit in both Queens and the Bronx. I would expect a summer C-band launch announcement from them because they're moving FAST. At least in my area, it seem like they're upgrading at a similar, if not faster pace compared to Verizon. Pics incoming! AT&T eNB 116408 / T-Mobile eNB 42887. This one is interesting not only because of the AT&T C-band but because T-Mobile upgraded this site without installing any Massive MIMO n41 antennas. There are just two of the RFS antennas that we normally get. It seems like there just isn't enough space on the rack for three antennas. Maybe sometime in the future they'll modify the actual antenna rack so that more can be added. Pre-upgrade the site was Band 2/12/66 with 2x2 MIMO across all bands. Now it's Band 2/12/66/71 with 4x4MIMO across all bands so the people in the area are still receiving a decent boost in capacity and speeds. AT&T eNB 112047, bad pic but the arrows on the billboard are pointing right at the C-band antenna lol — — — — — Last edit I promise: I noticed T-Mobile submit a permit to convert the keep site I found in Staten Island (Sprint eNB 75141). I 100% guessed it's location since I connected to it literally 4.5 miles across the water while inside a building. Glad to see I was right!
  13. AT&T eNB 110251 got all new antennas including C-band. The previous antennas on the site were ancient so I’m glad it got cleaned up. Edit: also eNB 115234
  14. Interesting that they're keeping that Band 25 Sprint RRU and cabinet. I'm pretty sure they did something similar when they kept T-Mobile eNB 875872. When I visited it a while back it was still broadcasting the keep PLMN on Band 25 but my phone would throw me back onto T-Mobile in less than 10 seconds if I tried to connect to it.
  15. I'm still seeing the stripes for partner coverage on my end.
  16. Can confirm T-Mobile eNB 875826 is converted. Looks like there's a Sprint RRU up there. Location (40.72920635526646, -73.92300128440183) — — — — — I also attempted to confirm the site at (40.737745921347205, -73.88466508925949) on the keep site map but it still has its Sprint equipment up. I didn't see any T-Mobile antennas on it. Coincidentally T-Mobile did submit a permit two days ago to remove the Sprint antennas on the building. It hasn't been approved yet though. — — — — — Got my highest upload speeds ever today. This is on eNB 56637 in Long Island City. Those 256QAM + 100MHz n41 speeds are gonna make some TMHI users happy.
  17. Permit submitted on May 5th for Sprint eNB 196271 to be converted into a T-Mobile site. Location: 40.594170548244925, -73.98153574104246
  18. T-Mobile recently requested a permit to remove the Sprint antennas from eNB 5863. This was one of Sprint's first 5G sites in Brooklyn. There's a T-Mobile site less than a block away so it makes sense but this is one of the few times I've spotted them decommissioning a non-keep/non-collocated site. It's Job # B00694601 in DOB Now. At least the site is immortalized in Street View:
  19. Just ran some speed tests and they're all between 0-1% on my iPhone. Highest I've gotten is 0.88%. Is this happening across multiple sites or just one?
  20. Can confirm Crown Heights is officially at 100MHz n41. Just like last time we got a bump in carrier size, the most noticeable impact is higher upload speeds. I just got 129Mbps inside my house but download speeds are still capping out around 650Mbps. The most noticeable change on the download side is that I'm getting those 600Mbps+ speeds even further from my home site. Once again, the only thing holding T-Mobile back is backhaul.
  21. Looks like this site's location was already confirmed by @thisischuck01 on Cellmapper. Location: 40.68386106415719, -73.87804143759858 It's probably gonna stay that way until Crown Castle gets around to upgrading all of the small cells they have littered throughout the borough. They've already started the n41 small cell upgrades in LA and Florida so hopefully they'll start here this summer. It looks like between September 2020 and March 2021 Crown Castle pretty much stopped reserving poles for small cells but they started reserving en masse again in April 2021, probably for 5G small cells. I made a map of all the small cell reservations that Crown Castle has made since then because they're likely going to be some of the first T-Mobile 5G small cells deployed. https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1kzPJw7a8bRuRlITZwaNGI29HcAB7Em9Q&usp=sharing Some of them like this one in Canarsie that was reserved on February 18, 2022, are right in the middle of a T-Mobile dead zone. The red dot is where the reserved pole is located.
  22. Sprint eNB 6438 is broadcasting the keep PLMN. Not NYC but the site is part of ex-Sprint's NYC market. Location: 41.108970886700284, -73.80691442283441 At this rate T-Mobile looks is probably going to match, if not surpass Verizon's macro density in a decent portion of NYC's suburbs and exurbs.
  23. Reviving another thread! I went up to Hudson, NY this weekend and tested T-Mobile and Verizon's networks while there. Most of the urbanized area of Hudson is served by a single site on top of Columbia Memorial Hospital that nearly every carrier is collocated on. Verizon's site at the hospital is broadcasting Band 2/5/13/66 and no 5G at all. T-Mobile's is broadcasting Band 2/12/41/66/71 and n41/71. Coverage on both carriers is roughly the same but speeds are leaps and bounds better on T-Mobile. If I had to take I guess, I think that this due to a combination of T-Mobile having more spectrum deployed and simply having fewer customers in the region. In equal conditions along Warren St (Hudson's Main Street) I was seeing average speeds of ~350Mbps on T-Mobile and on Verizon I was seeing ~60Mbps on average. In normal usage, I couldn't tell a difference between 60Mbps and 350Mbps on my phones. While in Hudson, I stayed at The Wick Hotel (I highly recommend it if you visit) which is located pretty much as far as you can get away from the city's main cell site while staying in Hudson. It's near the waterfront and just across the street from the Hudson Amtrak Station. In my hotel room the difference in the networks was a lot more noticeable. My T-Mobile line no longer connected to 5G. Instead it flipped between 5MHz of Band 12 and 5MHz of Band 71. On Verizon I was only able to get 10MHz of Band 13. During the day, the Verizon's Band 13 carrier could barely get over 1Mbps on the 1-2 bars of LTE I was seeing in my room. T-Mobile on the other hand was getting a consistent 12Mbps on both Band 12 and Band 71 with similar signal strength to Verizon. I also tested at 3AM to see the difference in speeds when the network is barely in use. This was the only time during my trip where Verizon outperformed T-Mobile. With those same 1-2 bars at 3AM I managed to get 54Mbps on Verizon and on T-Mobile I was only able to get up to 27Mbps. It seems like this difference in speed can mostly be attributed to the difference in carrier size as opposed to capacity. Sidenote: One thing I noticed in Hudson is that I often had a stronger signal on n41 than I did on Band 66. When I checked FieldTestMode I’d see something like Band 66 at -112dbm while n41 was at -106dbm. Goes to show how good n41's propagation can be in areas where they can just increase power to the max. — — — — — I also went for lunch at Frank Guido's Port of Call in Catskill, NY. Neither Verizon nor T-Mobile have 5G in Catskill. There, T-Mobile outperformed Verizon once again. Verizon's network was completely unusable in the restaurant. I couldn't load any social media or place a call and I was barely able to send a text out on the 1 bar of Band 13 I was seeing. I was unable to even run a speed test on Verizon as it failed every single time. My T-Mobile line on the other hand bounced between 1-2 bars of Band 12, enough to give me about 3Mbps down and 1Mbps up. — — — — — Purple and red markers are where the T-Mobile/Verizon site is located, the blue marker is where The Wick Hotel is, and the red line is Warren St. It seems like coverage is optimized on both carriers to cover Warren Street as best as they can.
  24. I'm usually asleep by then lol. I never really got the chance to test that late at night. I'm certain that I can probably get to the mid-700's at that time but my area is super T-Mobile heavy so I don't think I can get much faster than that. Interestingly though my speeds are faster at 8 in the morning than they are at midnight.
×
×
  • Create New...