I started as a new Sprint customer in early October. I got a Samsung Galaxy Note 3. The first unit had an issue with the home button sticking under the front bezel. You had to push the opposite side to get it to pop out again and be functional. That GN3 was replaced by the store with another GN3 which had a bad LTE radio. It worked, but got much slower data speeds than the unit with the bad home button. The store let me borrow their display unit (GN3) to test against my second GN3 and it proved out the slow data speeds of my second GN3. At this point, I decided to leave Sprint and come back when a TRI BAND device was available. Then I found the LG G2. I thought this was the answer to all my wants and needs. Great data speed and great in-building penetration. Sprint let me come back as a pre-order customer in early November.
I purchased the LG G2 specifically for TRI BAND. I wanted the in-building penetration that the lower frequency could give me. I was very willing to wait until the "Spark" upgrade took place in early 2014 which would add the additinal two bands to my G2. I'm currently also a Verizon customer. I was going to port my number over to Sprint once I was sure that I had a working phone from Sprint. Now, I'm in the scenario that if I want to wait until Sprint fixes this tower/device incompatibility issue, I would have to pay for two phone numbers. The G2 I have will only get 3G. I use my device quite frequently at work where there is no WiFi and I need the data speeds that 4G provides me with. This sucks.
With a rollout as big as Sprint Spark, one would think that they would at least have tested some devices in numerous markets to make sure all was well before this was generally released to the public. I'm afraid once the media picks up on this, it's going to make Sprint look really bad and leave a bad taste in many consumers mouths! This is quite the blunder!