Jump to content

jroepcke51

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    1,565
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by jroepcke51

  1. Runs great so far. Just little laggy for my 6 in some of the screen animations. Wifi calling to 3G doesn't work for me at all. I am disappointed.
  2. Took 13 minutes at work. Lets see how bad this slows down my 6. Only thing I care about is wificalling to cdma handoff. If it works well, ill stick to ios10. If not, ill go back to ios9 .
  3. What time will iOS 10 be released today?
  4. RT @NewMexicoFB: Congrats to @Lil_Pressley on being signed to the 53-man squad of the @packers #GoLobos https://t.co/xhZagGU18X

  5. I would think that would be easier than bring band 41. band 25 small cells from ericson would be awesome. They could deploy 7 to 10 at the same cost of 1 NV 1.0 tower (cost wise)
  6. It is worth it for me with 5 lines and I pay less than I would with Verizon, ATT or Tmo. I have a work verizon hotspot and yes they may have more coverage but suffer from the same issues sprint does. Yes it helps that band 26 is deployed and used as a bandaid fix for capacity. I think they should just come back and do the GMOs tha are left. I don't know where you live but in the heights I am pretty good except far north east heights.
  7. Today. Im fine paying less waiting for band 41 deployment. Sprint demo 3xCA today and hit 285megs on an HTC10.
  8. I saw your speed test in the Tmo thread. It is nice but think about it. Your speed is basically 10x10 and that is it until GSM and HSPA is turned off.
  9. It is a canned response. THe upgrades you want would not help with signal indoors. Only 800 would help that and I think that is a while off for southern NM and El Paso.
  10. Not in the short term. Who knows when it would be available to be deployed. AWS-3 will help more as that could be deployed later this year to the next I think. Not completely positive on that.
  11. RT @MikeAndMike: RT this for a chance to go to the 2016 NBA Finals with Greeny and Golic. #MikesFinal2Sweepstakeshttps://t.co/YZ7B5TIreU

  12. Frankly I think that second carrier is more important short term. Abq and El Paso should have the availability to do so.
  13. Spectrum is not an asset like inventory. Most telecoms record and recognize at historical cost. However with the new leasing standard effective for year end 2017 this will change.
  14. I perfer two year discount bc my firm will reimburse $200 for the upgrade. They do not reimburse for installment billing. That is probably the only reason I don't like it.
  15. I am not quite sure. It is positive as it means that Sprint can start to deploy in the IBEZ but I don't know if that means close or at the edge (which Alamagordo was)
  16. No I haven't. I have seen a couple more sites modified from initial Ericsson RRU11's to RRU31 as a part of the 65 mhz project. That is it.
  17.  

    #TheAccountant comes out in October. Needless to say I am excited.

  18. Not technically. It is the same market - the Albuquerque Market. ABQ already had band 26. Not all sites have it and those that don't suffer. However, high traffic areas of town Jefferson center, Louisiana Malls and UNM seem to be pretty good. Downtown is awful.
  19. No. Band 26 yes does cover band 5. However, the equipment that Ericsson has deployed for example is for frequency 806 to 824 and 851 to 869. 850 Cellular starts at 824 to 849 and 869 to 894. This would require new equipment or a rip and replace of current equipment unless there has been a class permissive update that I missed.
  20. I was mistaken as week as that was what I was thinking. No it is contiguous.
  21. Remember folks the issue is that band 5 is seperate from band 26 spectrum. Band 13 verizon is using is contiguous spectrum. If sprint bough USCC, it would require new equipment to aggregate the separate spectrum together and it would be usable only in USCC areas. Not worth it to me.
  22. No as that would require new equipment as that is release 11 LTE.
×
×
  • Create New...