Optimistically, yes - considering how he has been able to turn Sprint around and set it in more or less the right direction and headed toward a cash positive future in a few years. I was waiting for an equity stake announcement to shore up Sprint's short term financials to get them through NV faster and help with potential future buyouts. The T-Mobile rumor has abounded for quite some time and it seems that Softbank may have found a way around regulatory hurdles through majority ownership of Sprint in pursuing the deal again.
Realistically, it could go either way as they may have some other thoughts on where they want sprint to head. If they do let Dan go in his current capacity, I'm sure he will receive a hefty severance or if stepping down as Chairman may stay on the board with a sizable stock option (but that is probably more on the optimistic side)
but if you want to play worst case scenario, we may see another large-scale catastrophe or series of minor events that cumulatively destroy the future of softbank/sprint. Perhaps Japanese bank implosion or large-scale global financial meltdown, a nuclear disaster or attack, tsunamis, earthquakes, ww3, civil war in the US, alien invasions or even Godzilla for crying out loud. {sarcasm}. Either way it will be an amazing thing to behold. Whether that is an amazing and spectacular tragedy remains largely to be seen, but I'm leaning more towards the positive side of things and am glad they inked out all of the fine print, crossed their "t's"and dotted their "i's". The official announcement has taken (most) everyone by surprise, but with hindsight being 20-20 you can see where all of the pieces fit into place and how all of the players on the stage acted the part very well. Whether Sprint, Dan, T-Mobile, DT, Softbank or the rest, you can now put the pieces together fairly easily.
I don't believe there was any coincidence that:
1. T-Mobile made out with a nice chunk of change from the failed merger (which was never going to pass regulatory scrutiny anyway)
2. T-Mobile acquired a nice chunk of spectrum
3. Sprint lobbied against the doomed merger/buyout citing regulatory concerns
4. Softbank failed at their initial buyout of US carriers
5. D-T has been pursuing an exit strategy in various ways which clearly were to fail
6. Sprint has kept clearwire on life support but managed to put spectrum to use so it would not be lost while maintaining majority control of the company but not much of the liabilty.
My post is getting a little long winded but there are countless pieces that fell in to place at the right times all around. Most of this was more or less smoke and mirrors to consolidate spectrum holdings while keeping the big 2 from cannibalizing all of the 4th and lower tier carriers and their respective customers and spectrum holdings.
On the note of name change. Likely there will be some change but not too major. (softsprint? j/k) Perhaps they will just change the name to NOW and drop the "Now Network " mantra/slogan completely for something pertaining to the future