Jump to content

danlodish345

Honored Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    3,757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by danlodish345

  1. The New T-Mobile is trying to cover its bases by making a lot of promises that will require the use of all of the spectrum they have. They mention that they'll build a nationwide 5G network, which their lower bands spectrum holdings will be good for. But they have also been arguing that their competition will not only be Verizon and AT&T but also cable companies. Those comments combined with their commitment to becoming a WISP is where the high band is 100% a necessity. Without high-band spectrum, they wouldn't have the capacity to have both fixed wireless and mobile subscribers on their network in a way that effectively competes with other local ISPs. We can see that today with AT&T. Despite having a ton of spectrum they only allow fixed wireless in select rural areas and they do so with low data caps and high prices.
    Okay well the problem I have is that it's all promises but more than half of that never comes to fruition. Obviously we need fixed Broadband access. But it's still in its infancy. I agree capacity and coverage reliability consistency and overall quality is needed. But it's starting to sound more likes the grounds of promises that who knows they'll be delivered upon. I want to see up front definitive proof that they can cover all their bases including the coverage part. I'm very skeptical at this point of what can be done and I have from past experiences don't believe it companies promises unless I see actual results right in front of my face. So first thing is this whole thing has to be approved obviously. After that if the merger is approved then it's time for them to put their money where their mouth is. It will be time for them to put up or shut up.

    Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

  2. And that I think will be the major key here. That 2.5 is the bread and butter for their 5G and having to give some up would defeat the purpose of coming together. Another carrier will swoop in and buy up what Tmo/Sprint had to give up. If that happens...Then what? 
    Well the thing is also that divesting so that high band Spectrum. I still see low band spectrum being key for 5g networks.. So high band is still costly to deploy...

    Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

  3. 54 minutes ago, jefbal99 said:

    Rather than a divestment, to ensure the new three carrier system, I'd rather see a requirement of 4G coverage matching the Blue/Red in 36 months and 5G that overlays 4G.

    Just show me the proper coverage. That's what I want from this merger. If it happens. I don't believe a single thing until it happens in front of my eyes. I want to see real world results

    • Like 1
  4. So Sprint is telling me LTE Roaming with USCC is not possible on S9+, any one done any LTE roaming??
     
    Rickie
    That's totally false. It's definitely possible because the phone supports the proper bands for u.s. Cellular roaming so it might be just a provisioning thing but the hardware is there to support it

    Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

  5. Just experienced those 6 hours of T-Mobile outage and I hated it. No voice or texts, period! 
    I remember whenever Sprint had outages. I would at least roam on Verizon and have voice/SMS service. Not with T-Mobile. No service all day. This is probably the only negative I can think of to come from this merger for Sprint users.
    Yeah I understand your issue. I'm in New Jersey which is very far from the outage but it does suck when I lose service when I go south 2 South Jersey

    Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

×
×
  • Create New...