-
Posts
33,119 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1,209
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by S4GRU
-
-
I think it looks better than I was expecting, actually. Different strokes...
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
- 1
-
yeah' date=' and in the end I think people tend to forget that there is only so much one can do with a phone design wise...they all will be rectangle and have the same general shape with minor tweaks...less you get crazy and go kyocera echo on it. lol[/quote']
Sarge, I keep waiting for that starfish phone you keep promising me!
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
- 1
-
I am not surprised one iota. But I am glad it is now official. It will help us battle all the naysayers that run around saying that LTE is the end of unlimited.
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
- 1
-
corner pub
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
-
I was praying for you and your family when I heard about it all bearing down in your area.
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
-
Just to clarify for others, our testing PRL's that we have in the Download Center were created to help you connect to either 800 CDMA sites or G Block Testing 1xA/EVDO carriers. This is just because we are dorks and cannot help ourselves. They are not designed as daily drivers. Thanks!
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
- 2
-
But the big question Dino, is it happening at places we have identified as NV sites?
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
-
There is no comparison between the One X and the supposed image of the Evo One. To me the design of the One X blows that Evo rendering away. I'm really hopeful what is unveiled tomorrow looks better than the leaked image.
Although it's just my opinion, I agree with this post completely.
Robert
-
-
How many servers did you run the test on? Sprint's NV sites are on different backhaul. The servers you used to use may not be the best ones to run new speed tests on. We had several people in the Boston market who ran speed tests on new NV sites and had lackluster results. I suggested they try different servers and they were getting over 1.6Mbps.
Robert
- 1
-
I thought the E4GT did not photograph well. I thought it looked a little homely and boring in photos. But looking and holding it in person turned me on to the design right away.
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
-
landing gear
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
-
haha well b/w digiblur' date=' pyroscott, Robert, and WiWavelength here on the site, personally I tend to phrase anything tower related in a question. lol
99.999% of the time they know 10000% the correct answer. [/quote']
And I ask you questions about devices and chips. So, it's all good.
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner
- 1
-
typing problems
-
Carlos problems
Sent from my geriatric Evo
AUTO CORRECT FAIL?
Robert
- 2
-
OK...I created a Windows Phone sub forum under OS'es. In devices, there is no WP OEM, so I will keep them set up as is.
Robert
-
Good news. I have done some more digging, and the Samsung Conquer 4G (SPH-D600), Samsung Trender (SPH-M380) and Huawei Express (M650) explicitly support and have been certified for CDMA1X band class 14 (PCS A-G blocks).
https://apps.fcc.gov...html?id=1457558
https://apps.fcc.gov...html?id=1441475
https://apps.fcc.gov...html?id=1506030
AJ
Thanks for sifting through the data to find that out. Now, does anyone have these relatively obscure devices?
Robert
-
-
that was my fault. I could of sworn this was a sticky when i looked this morning. As I had replied in the other and this one still was the top thread...likely my browser not catching up is all.
just disregard it. been a long morning. lol
No sweat. I do dislike how pinned threads appear in our forums. They could be much better identified. But it's an IP Board limitation.
Robert
- 1
-
Can we unsticky this thread and use the one thats actually about the Sprint version instead?
I'm not sure I follow. This thread isn't "pinned" or a "sticky." And which thread is the Sprint version?
Robert
-
-
Thanks for the quick response guys! I think I am dealing with both situations. There are areas that are at the bottom of hills where I drop (VZW manages to maintain signals in most of those BTW) and there are relatively flat areas where I think the signal is fading due to tower distance. Not sure to how to know that for sure so just guessing on the distance situation.
If VZW keeps a signal, it is most likely on 850. So that gives me hope that Sprint 800 will help.
Robert
- 1
-
I'm curious if the NV towers will expand the coverage area surrounding them. Specifically, if there are "dead spots" between non-NV towers today, is there a chance those dead spots will be covered once the towers are upgraded to NV? If so, is this a function of the addition of frequencies (i.e. 800Mhz) or is it better equipment included with upgraded NV towers?
There are multiple locations in my area where I am guaranteed to drop a call, which I assume is the result of a coverage dead spot. Curious if NV may resolve this alone or if the combination of NV and a new handset capable of the new frequencies will be required.
Thanks...Dave
It depends why they are "dead." If you don't get a signal there, just because it is just outside of range, there is a good chance that NV will improve the signal there to be usable. If not by 1900, then most likely by 800.
However, if the issue why it is dead is because it's in a gully, ravine, canyon or because of RF interference in the area, then NV may not help the situation much. It depends on the reasons why it's a dead zone.
Robert
- 1
-
I was under the impression that the G Block was dedicated to LTE only, not 1x/DO
Deval, yes. However, Network Vision gear is being tested in G Block. 1xA and EVDO carriers get tested in G Block at every tower, including full drive testing. This is being done so as to not interfere with existing customers. Then, when testing is complete of NV gear at a tower or clusters of towers and it's ready to go live, they take the 1xA/EVDO carriers off G block frequencies and transition them to the appropriate A-F frequencies for commercial traffic. This is when the site is 3G live.
It is only after the 3G goes live do the NV OEM's start work on the LTE carrier and put it on G Block and start its testing. All Network Vision testing is done in G Block. But only LTE will be there permanently.
Robert
- 1
What's your speed like RIGHT NOW?
in Network, Network Vision/LTE Deployment
Posted
Thanks everyone who has contributed to this thread. It has run its course being an original thread that migrated over from the old boards. It's now closed.
Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner