Jump to content

Verizon Wireless: Only 5% of Users on LTE 1 Year After LTE Debut


jpkjeff

Recommended Posts

Until the iPhone has LTE, adoption will probably be slow-- even with the double data promos (only double data with an LTE device). I will say this, their LTE coverage around my house and work is great-- I get a stronger LTE signal than CDMA/EHRPD here at my house. At the office, they're closer to the same, but the CDMA cell breathes there more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly thought that it would be higher than that due to the length of time it's been out. Must be mostly early adopters, or people are either still in contract or taking a wait & see approach.

 

Well-- VZW's 3G network is great-- you can easily pull 1.5 - 2.5 megs just about anytime you need. Honestly, LTE is overkill for a phone. I do pull around 25-30 megs on my phone-- but a webpage or simple game or facebook update doesn't really need all that. I honestly think going to EVDO Rev. B for a few years would've been fine-- a nice match for HSPA+ for a while... LTE & 4G really is a lot of marketing hype at this point-- but I do love it!

 

I think you're going to see the same thing on Sprint-- LTE will take 3-4 years to get to >50% adoption-- then the EVDO can start coming down and farmed over to LTE. Remember, we're nerds on here-- we care about LTE and basebands and have enough sense to stay miles away from GSM-- most average Joes don't have the first clue about their phone except the brand that's stamped onto it-- they buy iPhones for God's sake!

Edited by 4ringsnbr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well-- VZW's 3G network is great-- you can easily pull 1.5 - 2.5 megs just about anytime you need. Honestly, LTE is overkill for a phone. I do pull around 25-30 megs on my phone-- but a webpage or simple game or facebook update doesn't really need all that. I honestly think going to EVDO Rev. B for a few years would've been fine-- a nice match for HSPA+ for a while... LTE & 4G really is a lot of marketing hype at this point-- but I do love it!

 

I think you're going to see the same thing on Sprint-- LTE will take 3-4 years to get to >50% adoption-- then the EVDO can start coming down and farmed over to LTE. Remember, we're nerds on here-- we care about LTE and basebands and have enough sense to stay miles away from GSM-- most average Joes don't have the first clue about their phone except the brand that's stamped onto it-- they buy iPhones for God's sake!

 

It's not that great everywhere.

a6fa669d-4433-a65d.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that great everywhere.

 

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

I've never seen it below about 850k anywhere in town... maybe we're lucky that they have the old Alltel network they upgraded to Rev. A along with their own PCS network here. Now that they've acquired parts of the old Centennial, they even have the A AND B sides of 850 in a few spots! Of course, I have LTE everywhere I go here, so it really doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen it below about 850k anywhere in town... maybe we're lucky that they have the old Alltel network they upgraded to Rev. A along with their own PCS network here. Now that they've acquired parts of the old Centennial, they even have the A AND B sides of 850 in a few spots! Of course, I have LTE everywhere I go here, so it really doesn't matter.

 

I'm glad I have 4G everywhere that is densely populated that I go. Once I leave 4G area, it is sparsely enough populated to have good 3G speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've never seen it below about 850k anywhere in town... maybe we're lucky that they have the old Alltel network they upgraded to Rev. A along with their own PCS network here. Now that they've acquired parts of the old Centennial' date=' they even have the A AND B sides of 850 in a few spots! Of course, I have LTE everywhere I go here, so it really doesn't matter.[/quote']

 

My government issue verizon phone that I use for work, I average speeds around 1MB on 850 channels, but 600k on 1900. I never get over 1MB on 1900. But I can get 1.8MB to 2.0MB on 850 on certain low burden rural sites ocasionally.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My government issue verizon phone that I use for work, I average speeds around 1MB on 850 channels, but 600k on 1900. I never get over 1MB on 1900. But I can get 1.8MB to 2.0MB on 850 on certain low burden rural sites ocasionally.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

 

The truth comes out. You are now a shade of orange...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The truth comes out. You are now a shade of orange...

 

I've always been open that I use Verizon for work and Sprint for personal. :)

 

Although, in my area there is no issue being on Sprint. Both networks perform about the same here. And Sprint and Verizon are colocated at most sites. The big difference here is I can use VZW on 850. Thus, there are lots of deep valleys and canyons I can get VZW and not Sprint.

 

Although VZW data speed drops off really significantly around -90dBm. Whereas on Sprint, its totally usable all the way to -101dBm. I've never really understood why. I've wondered if Verizon configures it cell edges as to not interfere with the entire cell performance. But I have no idea.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been open that I use Verizon for work and Sprint for personal. :)

 

Although, in my area there is no issue being on Sprint. Both networks perform about the same here. And Sprint and Verizon are colocated at most sites. The big difference here is I can use VZW on 850. Thus, there are lots of deep valleys and canyons I can get VZW and not Sprint.

 

Although VZW data speed drops off really significantly around -90dBm. Whereas on Sprint, its totally usable all the way to -101dBm. I've never really understood why. I've wondered if Verizon configures it cell edges as to not interfere with the entire cell performance. But I have no idea.

 

Posted via Forum Runner

 

It's the way the scheduler is configured-- with EVDO it's proportional-fair-- your handset reports its signal to the tower when it requests the data rate with a DRC value-- the higher the value, the better the signal (and more data requested). The link scheduler is configured to give higher DRC requests more timeslots to try to serve more users. Sprint's average signal quality is lower (on PCS 1900), so there are fewer high DRC requesters (speeds are more even-- even if they're bad!)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's funny. I remember having a sprint personal phone and Nextel work phone and it seemed like they never both worked in the same place

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

Years ago, my friend had cingular (old at&t wireless) TDMA and I had cingular GSM and I had service in many places she didn't. And that was when cingular was still in it's infancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...