Jump to content

Evo 4g lte question


dahauss

Recommended Posts

On the orig Evo 4g, when you recorded video, the audio would distort if you were in a loud environment. Has this Ben fixed on the new lte?

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

That is more an issue of the microphone over-modulating rather than a flaw with the phone. Microphones will over-modulate if you make too much noise, there is no way around that electrical limitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That is more an issue of the microphone over-modulating rather than a flaw with the phone. Microphones will over-modulate if you make too much noise, there is no way around that electrical limitation.

 

Sure you cam fix this. Just look at the iPhone ..... I went to a concert and my friend had an iPhone 4 and I had the Evo 4g. Later we played back the video we shot. My audio is almost static and his iPhone is nice and clear. Same when I shoot with m pro hd camera. That has Great audio even in very loud places while m phone distorts.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the orig Evo 4g, when you recorded video, the audio would distort if you were in a loud environment. Has this Ben fixed on the new lte?

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

Well considering the audio part of recording on my EVO3D was much better than my friend's Evo I would assume that this would be even more improved in the device. I haven't seen a review where they posted a video recorded on it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the maximum sound pressure level (SPL) spec of the microphone used.

 

MAXIMUM SPL: The loudest sound that the mic can pick up without distorting.

 

Apple uses a mic with a higher max SPL than the Evo appraently, which is why there is less distortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the maximum sound pressure level (SPL) spec of the microphone used.

 

MAXIMUM SPL: The loudest sound that the mic can pick up without distorting.

 

Apple uses a mic with a higher max SPL than the Evo appraently, which is why there is less distortion.

 

Also a more expensive mic from what I understand. Working on Pro video I know how expensive mics can get but you are glad when you listen to those recordings that you spent the extra cash. Software should be able to also adjust the levels on the fly to compensate for "too loud" sound but if the mic is just over modulating there is nothing software can do.

 

As an aside, there are bluetooth mics that let you record to a phone, but the mics are very nice so they should be able to records a loud concern even better than an iphone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also a more expensive mic from what I understand. Working on Pro video I know how expensive mics can get but you are glad when you listen to those recordings that you spent the extra cash. Software should be able to also adjust the levels on the fly to compensate for "too loud" sound but if the mic is just over modulating there is nothing software can do.

 

As an aside, there are bluetooth mics that let you record to a phone, but the mics are very nice so they should be able to records a loud concern even better than an iphone.

What Bluetooth small Mic do you recommend for evo 4g (orig not lte) that will work?How would you tell video app to use that Mic?

Edited by dahauss
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What Bluetooth small Mic do you recommend for evo 4g (orig not lte) that will work?How would you tell video app to use that Mic?

 

No one?

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...