Jump to content

Could Sprint's apathy towards Windows Phone come back to haunt them?


pyroscott

Recommended Posts

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 January 2012

 

We know how the lack of the iPhone hurt Sprint for years with customers bolting to AT&T first, then Verizon to get their hands on the coveted device. Sprint's distaste for the windows operating system has been well documented recently with Sprint calling the HTC Arrive a flop and saying they would not release another WP until around September. AT&T on the other hand has become very close to the struggling operating system recently with several powerful windows phones joining their lineup. I could see Apple being vindictive and refusing to release any new devices to that carrier to "punish" them for not being fully invested in their product, but would Microsoft do the same? Down the road, windows phone may become a powerhouse, and Microsoft may choose to ignore Sprint and release their best devices on other carriers. They might also give up on their mobile OS and disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 January 2012

 

Those are some good points, but MS first has to get some traction for WP. I see that every one is excited about Nokia being back in the market, which tells me people are more excited about the hardware that whats on it. This could be a good thing in the future, but so far I'm not seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 January 2012

 

It could hurt them. If WP starts to take off and demand starts to occur. But in the current device ecosystem and consumer demand weighted against Sprint's overwhelming contract with Apple, I know I wouldn't be investing much time or effort on a Windows phone at the moment if I were Sprint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 January 2012

 

I think Sprint still has some breathing room. If WP starts to move, it will take a couple of quarters for it to show relevance and it will be fairly easy for Sprint to jump back on the bandwagon. Remember, Sprint is hinting of a WP release this fall and right now, Nokia branded phones are the flavor of the month.

 

How long that last is anybody's guess, but remember, Nokia didn't have success building CDMA phones, and if I remember correctly, they farmed that business out to another OEM that built the phones but stamped Nokia on them before they ultimately pulled out of the U.S. market, thus, so far no Nokia CDMA phones. Around the release of the iPhone 5, Sprint may throw 1 or 2 WP phones out there with minimal support. If WP does take off, Sprint had better train its retail reps better. Last year i was playing with the arrive while waiting for a repair and the rep there didn't know a thing about the phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 January 2012

 

Like Legion125 said, It will be easy to jump on the WP bandwagon. Unlike apple, where there is all kinds of hoops to jump through and negotiations to do, WP is probably a lot easier to get. Besides, if Sprint wanted WP, I doubt MS would hesitate, they want/need all the exposure they can get to compete with Android and iOS. I would imagine that if WP takes off, Sprint could have a new WP phone within a couple months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 January 2012

 

A lot of the success of a platform depends on the marketing, which is often done by the carriers. Also, Sprint may know something we don't. The WP platform may be changing to allow more customization and compete more with Android instead of iOS, or Microsoft may be gearing up to aggressively market their platform towards the end of the year and Sprint wants some fresh handsets instead of stale ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 18 January 2012

 

@BenChase7...Although I' don't know exactly what the tiff b/twn MS and Sprint was about, but it seems that Sprint is more miffed than MS (anyone know what the disagreement was about?). I'm sure MS would be more than happy to throw $ at Sprint to advertise since MS seems to be in the mood to subsidize marketing. What is intriguing to me is Nokia's play in this. I'm starting to see some success in it's branding of hardware and software which is good for the WP OS in the short term. This could be the catalyst that MS needs if there is a big push by people to get the Lumia 900, although I still think people are more entranced by the hardware than software. Elop seems to think he's found the winning combination.

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Stephen-Elop-calls-the-Nokia-Lumias-first-real-Windows-Phones-all-others-hedging-their-bets_id26017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 18 January 2012

 

@pyroscott...WP does need more abilities at customization. Right now, I would cast WP as more of a clone of iOS (with exceptions) than any other OS. Until MS allows users to at least make enough changes so users can "make the phone their own" as far as colors, backgrounds and tile management, WP will continue to have that cookie cutter look which (to me) makes it hard to differentiate from one phone to another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 18 January 2012

 

I agree, WP is an experience similar to iOS, and they really need to allow some customization. They can give the user some control without losing the smoothness of the OS. It seems like they have a death grip on everything to do with the OS. From hardware requirements to lack of customization. I, for one, do not like my OS to micromanage my user experience and that is the main reason why I continue to use android devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 18 January 2012

 

Maybe a Launcher type of skin will be created for WP eventually. It just will have to come with WP's blessing since its not open source like Android.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...