Jump to content

Two Sites supposedly live with CDMA 800 in Rural Chicago Market


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

I would not worry about that -84 dBm RSSI. But look at that -3.0 dB Ec/Io. That is stellar -- no doubt, a completely unloaded carrier. Even with a strong signal, typical Ec/Io in a moderately loaded cell is roughly -7 dB.

 

AJ

would u mind explaining what Ec/Io Is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not worry about that -84 dBm RSSI. But look at that -3.0 dB Ec/Io. That is stellar -- no doubt, a completely unloaded carrier. Even with a strong signal, typical Ec/Io in a moderately loaded cell is roughly -7 dB.

 

AJ

I know the signal quality is good... but comparing it to Verizon's cellular 850 signal-- I can get -50 to -60 easily in unloaded sectors within a mile of the tower. I would expect a stronger overall signal closer to the tower. But yeah, anything over -7 dB for Ec/Io is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would u mind explaining what Ec/Io Is?

 

It's the ratio of the carrier energy from the total received energy on the channel. The more negative it is, the more carrier pollution or noise you're getting. Typically, when it falls below -11 dB, you start having real issues with calls. You should see -7 dB or higher for good signal quality. If it gets below -14 or so, you'll probably lose the call or switch to another sector, which is no big deal on CDMA, but likely would mean a dropped call on GSM.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My tower in Huntley, IL was down this weekend and I contacted Sprint about it and they said it is a Network Vision tower. Noe today I am getting higher 3G speeds. My peak download speed was 2.0 Mbps and .8 Mbps upload. Average is 1.6 Mbps and .6 Mbps upload. :D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yup' date=' your iPhone is compatible with NV upgrades - you will appreciate the difference![/quote']

 

Yes, except it does not support 800 CDMA.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wish my Epic supported ESMR so I could test out these channels as they pop up! By any chance, has someone compared the signal strength of the 800mhz channel to a phone using just 1900mhz in the same location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Yes, except it does not support 800 CDMA.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

Robert:

 

I was looking at the iPhone 4S specs on the apple site and it shows the following:

 

 

Cellular and Wireless

 

World phone

UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz);

GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz)3

802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi (802.11n 2.4GHz only)

Bluetooth 4.0 wireless technology

 

It clearly shows 800 right there on the CDMA section. I really hope the iPhone can support 800 CDMA because I am not eligible for an upgrade until July 2013. By then i'll be buying the new iPhone.

 

Please let me know Robert and thanks

 

Walter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert:

 

I was looking at the iPhone 4S specs on the apple site and it shows the following:

 

 

Cellular and Wireless

 

World phone

UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz);

GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz)3

802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi (802.11n 2.4GHz only)

Bluetooth 4.0 wireless technology

 

It clearly shows 800 right there on the CDMA section. I really hope the iPhone can support 800 CDMA because I am not eligible for an upgrade until July 2013. By then i'll be buying the new iPhone.

 

Please let me know Robert and thanks

 

Walter

 

I am pretty sure Apple is referencing the Cellular band that Verizon uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Robert:

 

I was looking at the iPhone 4S specs on the apple site and it shows the following:

 

Cellular and Wireless

 

World phone

UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA (850' date=' 900, 1900, 2100 MHz);

GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz)3

802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi (802.11n 2.4GHz only)

Bluetooth 4.0 wireless technology

 

It clearly shows 800 right there on the CDMA section. I really hope the iPhone can support 800 CDMA because I am not eligible for an upgrade until July 2013. By then i'll be buying the new iPhone.

 

Please let me know Robert and thanks

 

Walter[/quote']

 

Walter

 

This is inaccurate. I wish Apple would correct it. The iPhone 4 and 4S do not support 800 SMR, irregardless of what they keep saying. They only support 850 Cellular band, and they incorrectly label it as 800.

 

The FCC testing docs on the iPhones clearly show the frequency sets supported, and they start just outside of 800 SMR and only include 850 Cellular frequencies.

 

Your iPhone will not run on Sprint 800. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is inaccurate. I wish Apple would correct it. The iPhone 4 and 4S do not support 800 SMR, irregardless of what they keep saying. They only support 850 Cellular band, and they incorrectly label it as 800.

 

It is not so much inaccurate as it is ambiguous. For many years, Cellular 800 MHz, CDMA 800, TDMA 800, etc., were all accepted nomenclature. But the ascendance of iDEN 800 and the creation of the GSM 850 standard about a decade ago led to a clarification in terminology from Cellular 800 MHz to Cellular 850 MHz. That said, many do still reference Cellular 800 MHz in some way, shape, or form. While that is not entirely wrong, as there is established precedent to deem it 800 MHz, it certainly does lack absolute clarity.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not so much inaccurate as it is ambiguous. For many years' date=' Cellular 800 MHz, CDMA 800, TDMA 800, etc., were all accepted nomenclature. But the ascendance of iDEN 800 and the creation of the GSM 850 standard about a decade ago led to a clarification in terminology from Cellular 800 MHz to Cellular 850 MHz. That said, many do still reference Cellular 800 MHz in some way, shape, or form. While that is not entirely wrong, as there is established precedent to deem it 800 MHz, it certainly does lack absolute clarity.

 

AJ[/quote']

 

Agreed. But referencing this way in this day and age with Sprint's new use of SMR causes mass confusion and is misleading. And it won't make the iPhone run on Sprint 800, but so many people mistakenly think it will. :dep:

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

 

EDIT: I too was confused back in October when those specs were first posted by Apple. I had to be corrected in another forum. Which definitely hurt my ego. :dazed:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Walter

 

This is inaccurate. I wish Apple would correct it. The iPhone 4 and 4S do not support 800 SMR, irregardless of what they keep saying. They only support 850 Cellular band, and they incorrectly label it as 800.

 

The FCC testing docs on the iPhones clearly show the frequency sets supported, and they start just outside of 800 SMR and only include 850 Cellular frequencies.

 

Your iPhone will not run on Sprint 800. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

Robert:

 

Thanks for the clarification and explanation. At least i'll still be able to enjoy NV in some way, especially the data speeds. The signal in NYC from sprint is great so I guess missing out on 800 wont affect me much.

 

Hopefully next year when I upgrade to the new iPhone, it'll be compatible for 800.

 

Thanks again,

 

Walter

Edited by Wfmets45
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bands are close enough that the antenna should work. Why couldn't an upgrade of the baseband enable those frequencies? Would it be that the Qualcomm radio isn't capable of restricting its broadcasts tightly enough without a hardware filter?

 

I so await the days of cheap low-power software radio. It is coming some day and the idea of having a carrier/frequency specific device of any kind will seem laughable. The device will just switch among the various antennas as needed for microwave, 1500-1900, and 700-900. Anyone have a technical objection to this prediction, other than software radio chips currently being too expensive and power hungry?

 

I also wonder if you couldn't have a solid state antenna that could switch segments in and out to change length (and thus frequency response) but I don't know enough about electrical engineering and antenna design to know what the pitfalls are there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bands are close enough that the antenna should work. Why couldn't an upgrade of the baseband enable those frequencies? Would it be that the Qualcomm radio isn't capable of restricting its broadcasts tightly enough without a hardware filter?

 

The emissions mask filter is irrelevant if the IPhone 4S does not have a power amp module that covers 817-824 MHz.

 

I so await the days of cheap low-power software radio. It is coming some day and the idea of having a carrier/frequency specific device of any kind will seem laughable. The device will just switch among the various antennas as needed for microwave, 1500-1900, and 700-900. Anyone have a technical objection to this prediction, other than software radio chips currently being too expensive and power hungry?

 

Software defined radio gets way too much play as some sort of panacea. Ubiquitous airlink compatibility requires far more than software modems that can adapt to any number of modulation schemes. As mentioned, it requires compatible power amps and antennas. Not to mention, MIMO requirements make multi band antenna arrays much more impractical.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...