Jump to content

China Mobile Seeking Stake In United States


4GHoward

Recommended Posts

Interesting.

If they buyout Clearwire's shares(and the soon to next cable operators), this would really help both Sprint and China Mobile. I do see, however, if this does happen, Clearwire's network will have to remain separate from the NV tower architecture to avoid any problems from the DoD, since they see any Chinese company with direct access to a major U.S. telecom network as a threat to national security.

 

Overall, Sprint would no longer have to worry about keeping Clearwire afloat and the expansion of the TD-LTE network throughout Clearwire's footprint. However, this will bring competition to Sprint's front door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom can serve T-Mobile in the United States, I believe China Mobile can make it happen in the United States also.

 

With Stipulations from Homeland Security to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

China and the Fed don't exactly love one another.

There's a Google search.

http://bit.ly/IGa6On

 

There was a time when United States didn't like Germany during World War II, and now they are accepted to have a business in the United States. It is possible that China can change in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a time when United States didn't like Germany during World War II, and now they are accepted to have a business in the United States. China can change in the future.

The fed's don't see it that way. Thus Sprint was(for the most part) forced to decline Huawei and ZTE's Network Vision bids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fed's don't see it that way. Thus Sprint was(for the most part) forced to decline Huawei and ZTE's Network Vision bids.

 

It might work out for Clearwire as they use Chinese Vendors to supply most of their equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So does many smaller carriers. I don't see China Mobile getting too much trouble buying into Clearwire.

 

Their goal is to promote TDD LTE which Clearwire is planning to use, and Clearwire really needs the funding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just do not see sprint letting another carrier or outside party buying out clearwire. I think sprint would reject any bid that anyone would have. They need that spectrum for capacity, but probably do not want to look like they have a huge spectrum holding for future spectrum auctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom can serve T-Mobile in the United States, I believe China Mobile can make it happen in the United States also.

 

Deutsch Telekom is NOT making it work.. They have been trying to unload T-Mobile for the last year.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Deutsch Telekom is NOT making it work.. They have been trying to unload T-Mobile for the last year.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Actually, i heard rumblings about 4 or 5 years ago about T-Mobile. It just took until last year to put a deal together.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint should just buy them out.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

 

Don't have the money and it would be blocked by DOJ. It would be nice though

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Don't have the money and it would be blocked by DOJ. It would be nice though

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Why would the DoJ block Sprint from buying Clearwire?

 

Sent from my HTC Titan using Board Express

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would the DoJ block Sprint from buying Clearwire?

 

Sent from my HTC Titan using Board Express

 

We were talking about Sprint buying T-Mobile

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the DoJ would block sprint buying clear. They have no reason. No loss of carriers and sprint has always been one of the better networks when it comes to wholesaling. The only problem I see is the FCC wanting them to sell some of the spectrum, so they do not hog it like att/Verizon. Or blocking sprint in future auctions.

 

Sprint could keep the PCS spectrum and divest the AWS, or the other way around. And I don't think they would be blocked from future auctions if they abide by the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Sprint could keep the PCS spectrum and divest the AWS, or the other way around. And I don't think they would be blocked from future auctions if they abide by the rules.

 

I edited my post. I thought y'all were talking about buying clear not tmobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, DoJ would block sprint buying tmobile.

 

I think buying clear would be smarter. If they bought clear, they would not need spectrum for a long while.

 

Actually, the FCC would try to make them sell off part of the EBS/BRS spectrum just to be jerks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, the FCC would try to make them sell off part of the EBS/BRS spectrum just to be jerks.

 

 

Exactly. Outright ownership of Clear's spectrum would preclude Sprint from ever being able to jump on the "spectrum crisis" bandwagon that ATT and Verizon are whining about. All the whining and padding of Senator's pockets (John Kerry is now a Lightsquared fan?) will eventually pay off for them. I don't want Sprint to be stuck out on an island with its "new spectrum" being cost prohibitive to expand with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...