Jump to content

FCC rules on certain spectrum?


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

I keep reading about Verizon's 700c spectrum (B13).  What exactly are the rules to this spectrum that Verizon won?  I know phones are supposed to come sim unlocked, but what else?

 

I've read something about them being unable to throttle as a rule for winning that spectrum too.  I was just curious because on an unlimited data Verizon business line, it's advertised as unlimited data but in the terms and conditions it says,

 

 

Fair Usage Clause  In the event that any subscriber averages more than one hundred (100) minutes of international voice minutes (resulting from calls that originate outside of the U.S.), or one hundred (100) megabytes of international data usage (resulting from data transmission that originate outside of the U.S.), over three (3) consecutive monthly billing cycles, such subscriber(s) shall be deemed to be have violated the Fair Usage provision of this Amendment, and Verizon Wireless shall provide written notice to customer with a list of such subscriber(s). Thereafter, Verizon Wireless and employer shall meet within thirty (30) days after receipt of such written notice by employer to discuss a resolution to mitigate excessive usage by the identified subscriber(s), which may include disconnection of service(s) for such subscriber(s), or adjustment of pricing for the plan affected by such excessive usage. Should 5 GB of data usage be reached in any given billing cycle, Verizon Wireless will limit the data throughput speeds for additional usage for the remainder of the then-current bill cycle.

 

Can somebody shed some light on this?

 

Also, if you have a question regarding other spectrum rules, please post here so we can keep a general spectrum rules discussion thread going.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/27.16 contains the actual text of the law.

 

It basically says that Verizon has to not lock handsets, and provide whatever technical specifications/network information necessary for third-party device manufacturers to make devices (like the Nexus) that work on the Verizon's network as long as said devices don't create any detrimental interference. It also says that Verizon has to prove interference if they deny a third-party's request to allow a device to access the network, and then tell them what they need to know to remedy that. 

 

As bipbapbam said, they only throttled on their 3G network, but recently they announced that they will not throttle any users that are still on unlimited plans, which doesn't mean much considering there are so few people left on unlimited plans.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I truly hope that the 600mhz auction has open access rules attached to the same extent as the 700mhz C block did - I love the fact that Verizon has to sell their devices unlocked, although it will be less relevant with T-Mobile and other potential participants. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did verizon get conned into letting people tether their phone with the data they bought without paying extra? 

Well actually, why should people pay extra for the data they already bought. Why should it matter whether you use it on the phone proper or as tethering?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well actually, why should people pay extra for the data they already bought. Why should it matter whether you use it on the phone proper or as tethering?

It's actually quite silly now.  With phone screens coming in 2K and 4K resolution, it can be just as demanding on the network now as tethering a tablet or laptop.  Before, phones used significantly less data, but I believe that trend is starting to change. (hence more carriers including tethering on unlimited data plans.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually quite silly now. With phone screens coming in 2K and 4K resolution, it can be just as demanding on the network now as tethering a tablet or laptop. Before, phones used significantly less data, but I believe that trend is starting to change. (hence more carriers including tethering on unlimited data plans.)

I agree.

 

I'm curious what is going to occur with data prices next year, as 4k devices start becoming mainstream. Networks offering unlimited data definitely will take a hit, unless there is a reasonable network speed management system in place, or the Artimis pcell technology really begins to take off soon and quickly, as that is the best solution there seems to be, other than having the FCC gather the carriers to a conference and offer a radical spectrum solution similar to what I have in mind.

 

I've read online that a 4k movie stream requires a minimal 15mbps speed. I'm already thinking that if T-Mobile is indeed planning some sort of unlimited video program, they might be preparing to also institute an across the board 15mbps speed cap, in order to manage the network accommodating this future growth in data.

 

However, per gb data prices on bucket plans are a big question in my mind regarding this. I've also read online that an hour of a 4k movie stream is around 7gb. At Verizon's current bucket rates per gb equivalence of around $6 per gb, that is $42 per hour of 4k movie streaming. A two hour movie, $82, which is considering a large enough data bucket not to run into overages for that.

 

4k on mobile will not be commercially successful at those rates, for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...