Jump to content

World's first fully digital radio transmitter built purely from microprocessor technology


mhammett

Recommended Posts

http://www.gizmag.com/digital-radio-transmitter-microprocessor-technology/36380/

 

 

For the first time in history, a prototype radio has been created that is claimed to be completely digital, generating high-frequency radio waves purely through the use of integrated circuits and a set of patented algorithms without using conventional analog radio circuits in any way whatsoever. This breakthrough technology promises to vastly improve the wireless communications capabilities of everything from 5G mobile technology to the multitude devices aimed at supporting the Internet of Things (IoT).

......

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@kfitchard: A new entry into the 5G debate: Kumu's full duplex technology could revolutionize wireless networks https://t.co/B9J7eyV9LE via @gigaom

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I think we have discussed here before but this is the first time that the vendor has demonstrated a commercially viable system. The multiplier effect won't be as big as the pCell's but it will definitely help the FDD rich carriers. Now it will require new hardware at both the base station and the user terminal so maybe leaving it for 5G is appropriate. pCell does not require new user hardware so it could definitely be used right away at places like stadiums or other places where a lot of people congregate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have discussed here before but this is the first time that the vendor has demonstrated a commercially viable system. The multiplier effect won't be as big as the pCell's but it will definitely help the FDD rich carriers. Now it will require new hardware at both the base station and the user terminal so maybe leaving it for 5G is appropriate. pCell does not require new user hardware so it could definitely be used right away at places like stadiums or other places where a lot of people congregate.

This won't be allowed to run in current fdd spectrum because it would interfere with phones that don't have the new full duplex noise cancellation.

 

But Tdd is good to go.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This won't be allowed to run in current fdd spectrum because it would interfere with phones that don't have the new full duplex noise cancellation.

 

But Tdd is good to go.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If TDD is already used I don't see how that is any different than FDD. You need new hardware in both cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If TDD is already used I don't see how that is any different than FDD. You need new hardware in both cases.

Yes but Tdd is licensed to use same channel for uplink and downlink with some restrictions on duty cycle I think.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@kfitchard: A new entry into the 5G debate: Kumu's full duplex technology could revolutionize wireless networks https://t.co/B9J7eyV9LE via @gigaom

 

I like Kevin Fitchard, but gee, I wonder which is his primary wireless provider.

 

(For instance in many U.S. LTE systems, our devices receive data from the tower in a 2100 MHz channel, but they send information back at 1700 MHz).

 

#TechPressBias

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Kevin Fitchard, but gee, I wonder which is his primary wireless provider.

 

 

#TechPressBias

 

AJ

Considering three out of four national LTE networks (and many smaller networks) use AWS frequencies in a fairly significant manner for LTE, that really doesn't say much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering three out of four national LTE networks (and many smaller networks) use AWS frequencies in a fairly significant manner for LTE, that really doesn't say much.

 

Yes, and all four national networks use PCS frequencies in some manner for LTE.  Touché.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering three out of four national LTE networks (and many smaller networks) use AWS frequencies in a fairly significant manner for LTE, that really doesn't say much.

 

I get your point.  I get Kevin's point.  Because of the massive FDD offset for AWS, that makes it much easier to explain to the layperson 2100 MHz as the downlink and 1700 MHz as the uplink -- rather than, say, 850 MHz as the downlink and 850 MHz as the uplink.

 

Wait, what, 850 MHz for both?  How does that jive with this article about full duplex as developing technology for both links?

 

No, no, no, it is actually 869-894 MHz for the downlink and 824-849 MHz for the uplink.  In the end, just 2100 MHz and 1700 MHz are clean and neat.

 

But I do think a tech press bias is evident.  From anecdotal experience, most use VZW, AT&T, or T-Mobile.  They do not come across as though they like VZW and AT&T, but many still subscribe for overall coverage reliability.  Those who use T-Mobile as their primary provider seem to take a rooting interest in Magenta.  And that colors their published pieces -- pun intended.  Much of that can be attributed to the replacement of journalism with blogging.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I saw this too on my AT&T S22 while roaming on US Cellular. I thought it was an Android bug since CellMapper was doing the same thing (didn't get a screenshot of that one). N66 makes more sense than N1. 
    • Thanks, that was good timing, I did see your report as I was buttoning up this latest update and added an override for that.. did it not work?   Ok, was that on AT&T also? Please send a report if you happen to see it again and safely have the opportunity. You can always do the long-press on the fly and then send a later one with an explanation pointing to the earlier one.. your username is attached to the long-press reports, so it's not an issue.
    • I sent a report in earlier, n66 reporting as n1. There should be two different reports, I couldn't find the button the first time so I just long pressed the connection type to send, then I remembered where it was. I put a note about the issue on the 2nd report. Both reports from me are for the same issue. Also, it might have been on a prior release but earlier this week I also saw n66 reported as n65 on the app. I was driving and wasn't able to send a report in for that one. 
    • One more SCP beta rolling out.. includes more bugfixes and minor improvements. Pending any major issues with this version, it will be released to the public within a few days. Thanks for all the help and feedback!
    • Passed by the former Sprint site at 1184 60th St in Brooklyn last week and noticed T-Mobile took down all of the Sprint equipment but it looked like they installed some new cabinets so conversion is likely in progress.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...