Jump to content

World's first fully digital radio transmitter built purely from microprocessor technology


mhammett

Recommended Posts

http://www.gizmag.com/digital-radio-transmitter-microprocessor-technology/36380/

 

 

For the first time in history, a prototype radio has been created that is claimed to be completely digital, generating high-frequency radio waves purely through the use of integrated circuits and a set of patented algorithms without using conventional analog radio circuits in any way whatsoever. This breakthrough technology promises to vastly improve the wireless communications capabilities of everything from 5G mobile technology to the multitude devices aimed at supporting the Internet of Things (IoT).

......

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@kfitchard: A new entry into the 5G debate: Kumu's full duplex technology could revolutionize wireless networks https://t.co/B9J7eyV9LE via @gigaom

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I think we have discussed here before but this is the first time that the vendor has demonstrated a commercially viable system. The multiplier effect won't be as big as the pCell's but it will definitely help the FDD rich carriers. Now it will require new hardware at both the base station and the user terminal so maybe leaving it for 5G is appropriate. pCell does not require new user hardware so it could definitely be used right away at places like stadiums or other places where a lot of people congregate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have discussed here before but this is the first time that the vendor has demonstrated a commercially viable system. The multiplier effect won't be as big as the pCell's but it will definitely help the FDD rich carriers. Now it will require new hardware at both the base station and the user terminal so maybe leaving it for 5G is appropriate. pCell does not require new user hardware so it could definitely be used right away at places like stadiums or other places where a lot of people congregate.

This won't be allowed to run in current fdd spectrum because it would interfere with phones that don't have the new full duplex noise cancellation.

 

But Tdd is good to go.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This won't be allowed to run in current fdd spectrum because it would interfere with phones that don't have the new full duplex noise cancellation.

 

But Tdd is good to go.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If TDD is already used I don't see how that is any different than FDD. You need new hardware in both cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If TDD is already used I don't see how that is any different than FDD. You need new hardware in both cases.

Yes but Tdd is licensed to use same channel for uplink and downlink with some restrictions on duty cycle I think.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@kfitchard: A new entry into the 5G debate: Kumu's full duplex technology could revolutionize wireless networks https://t.co/B9J7eyV9LE via @gigaom

 

I like Kevin Fitchard, but gee, I wonder which is his primary wireless provider.

 

(For instance in many U.S. LTE systems, our devices receive data from the tower in a 2100 MHz channel, but they send information back at 1700 MHz).

 

#TechPressBias

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Kevin Fitchard, but gee, I wonder which is his primary wireless provider.

 

 

#TechPressBias

 

AJ

Considering three out of four national LTE networks (and many smaller networks) use AWS frequencies in a fairly significant manner for LTE, that really doesn't say much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering three out of four national LTE networks (and many smaller networks) use AWS frequencies in a fairly significant manner for LTE, that really doesn't say much.

 

Yes, and all four national networks use PCS frequencies in some manner for LTE.  Touché.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering three out of four national LTE networks (and many smaller networks) use AWS frequencies in a fairly significant manner for LTE, that really doesn't say much.

 

I get your point.  I get Kevin's point.  Because of the massive FDD offset for AWS, that makes it much easier to explain to the layperson 2100 MHz as the downlink and 1700 MHz as the uplink -- rather than, say, 850 MHz as the downlink and 850 MHz as the uplink.

 

Wait, what, 850 MHz for both?  How does that jive with this article about full duplex as developing technology for both links?

 

No, no, no, it is actually 869-894 MHz for the downlink and 824-849 MHz for the uplink.  In the end, just 2100 MHz and 1700 MHz are clean and neat.

 

But I do think a tech press bias is evident.  From anecdotal experience, most use VZW, AT&T, or T-Mobile.  They do not come across as though they like VZW and AT&T, but many still subscribe for overall coverage reliability.  Those who use T-Mobile as their primary provider seem to take a rooting interest in Magenta.  And that colors their published pieces -- pun intended.  Much of that can be attributed to the replacement of journalism with blogging.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...