Jump to content

Universal Broadband deployments


mrknowitall526

Recommended Posts

I know it's not super Sprint-related, but I thought this might be an interesting topic.

 

I live in PA and am set to get DSL next week per the state's universal broadband law. I happened to write this article that got posted on DSLReports today... http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Filling-in-the-Broadband-Gaps-Your-Tales-of-Connection-130871'> http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Filling-in-the-Broadband-Gaps-Your-Tales-of-Connection-130871

 

Anyone have a similar experience where you live?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before 2001 we had two incumbent ISP providers here in Bristol, VA, Charter Communications and Embarq which is now called CenturyLink.  Both companies offered sub-par service at a high premium at the time; city residents were fed up with price hikes from both companies creating stale competition.  It was time for a new competitor to come to the plate in the form of BVU OptiNet. During the late 90s BVU was busy stringing up fiber to create there own network that would be used between local city government buildings, city schools, and telemetry for BVU owned electric substations.  Between 1999 and 2001 BVU actively pursued other ways to utilize this infrastructure to benefit the community. In early 2001, broadband and PCX telephone applications were introduced to local schools and government offices. As local businesses learned of BVU’s broadband capabilities, they began expressing interest, surveys confirmed that there was significant public interest, by local consumers, in BVU providing competitive telecom and information.

 

In order for BVU to offer telecommunication and information services, it would take over 2 years working with lobbyist to change Virginia’s laws and to complete necessary regulatory compliance to obtain state approvals. In addition, just weeks prior to OptiNet’s planned launch, the incumbent CATV provider (Charter Communications) filed an injunction against BVU’s deployment of cable television services.  In the end BVU succeeded against the injunction and was able to launch their FTTH services toward the end of 2003.  Here recently a poll was conducted and BVU has a 90% penetration rate in the City of Bristol, VA against Charter Communications.  
 
BVU was the first municipality in the United States to offer the full triple-play of services (telephone, cable and Internet) over a fiber-to-the-home network; therefore, many entities, both public and private, and from the U.S. and abroad, have sought knowledge and direction from the seasoned professionals at BVU.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before 2001 we had two incumbent ISP providers here in Bristol, VA, Charter Communications and Embarq which is now called CenturyLink. Both companies offered sub-par service at a high premium at the time; city residents were fed up with price hikes from both companies creating stale competition. It was time for a new competitor to come to the plate in the form of BVU OptiNet. During the late 90s BVU was busy stringing up fiber to create there own network that would be used between local city government buildings, city schools, and telemetry for BVU owned electric substations. Between 1999 and 2001 BVU actively pursued other ways to utilize this infrastructure to benefit the community. In early 2001, broadband and PCX telephone applications were introduced to local schools and government offices. As local businesses learned of BVU’s broadband capabilities, they began expressing interest, surveys confirmed that there was significant public interest, by local consumers, in BVU providing competitive telecom and information.

 

In order for BVU to offer telecommunication and information services, it would take over 2 years working with lobbyist to change Virginia’s laws and to complete necessary regulatory compliance to obtain state approvals. In addition, just weeks prior to OptiNet’s planned launch, the incumbent CATV provider (Charter Communications) filed an injunction against BVU’s deployment of cable television services. In the end BVU succeeded against the injunction and was able to launch their FTTH services toward the end of 2003. Here recently a poll was conducted and BVU has a 90% penetration rate in the City of Bristol, VA against Charter Communications.

 

BVU was the first municipality in the United States to offer the full triple-play of services (telephone, cable and Internet) over a fiber-to-the-home network; therefore, many entities, both public and private, and from the U.S. and abroad, have sought knowledge and direction from the seasoned professionals at BVU.

 

 

Interesting! Besides Verizon offering FIOS to a limited area in a city 20 minutes from me, there is only one other place with FTTH and it's a small borough with a municipal fiber operator. Once they came to town the local cable co was forced to be priced competitively or go out of business for lack of customers.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice article! I wish we had that in my area...Our farm house is in the middle of the ends of 2 DSL providers: AT&T from the north and Frontier from the south...neither want to build out. AT&T is the the current POTS provider, and recently laid all new underground lines, but didn't bother to extend DSL service :wall: ... 57,000ft. from the CO that's from a town twice as far away from the closest town with a CO!

 

Still running on a Sprint 3G card, though...it's not too bad since the NV upgrades

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice article! I wish we had that in my area...Our farm house is in the middle of the ends of 2 DSL providers: AT&T from the north and Frontier from the south...neither want to build out. AT&T is the the current POTS provider, and recently laid all new underground lines, but didn't bother to extend DSL service :wall: ... 57,000ft. from the CO that's from a town twice as far away from the closest town with a CO!

 

Still running on a Sprint 3G card, though...it's not too bad since the NV upgrades

 Yikes, 57,000 feet!  That's somewhere around 11 miles.  That's crazy!  Doesn't make much sense that they would replace the lines but not upgrade to DSL... but maybe it is coming soon.  

 

Sometimes they way they wire up places makes no sense - makes you wonder what they were thinking when they did it in the first place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In case anyone who read this was curious, just placed my DSL order today. 1.1-3 Mbps from Verizon. Was hoping for 3.1-7 but we'll see if they can increase the speed.

 

Supposed to be installed on Wednesday. Some how we didn't qualify for a self- install

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case anyone who read this was curious, just placed my DSL order today. 1.1-3 Mbps from Verizon. Was hoping for 3.1-7 but we'll see if they can increase the speed.

 

Supposed to be installed on Wednesday. Some how we didn't qualify for a self- install

Unless you previously had Verizon services installed and activated at your address, they won't ever let you do a self install. Also the same applies if you had service, cancel for a long period of time and then try to sign back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you previously had Verizon services installed and activated at your address, they won't ever let you do a self install. Also the same applies if you had service, cancel for a long period of time and then try to sign back up.

We have a landline, though, but I guess that doesn't count.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...