Jump to content

News Article about sprints problems in Malibu..


runagun

Recommended Posts

http://www.malibutimes.com/news/article_6bbb077c-0218-11e4-95b5-0019bb2963f4.html

 

 

In response to Rosenthal’s letter, Ryan Shepard, regional sales manager for Sprint, said that Malibu “doesn’t have normal cell towers.” The city is one of only eight communities in California with “DAF” nodes — a relaying system for wireless users in difficult terrain. Shepard said the manufacturer no longer supports the DAF product, so it’s difficult to make repairs. Sprint has been replacing broken DAFs with the LTE network. 

 

I'm assuming this a repeater system...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Sprint wants to spearhead their small cell strategy. Deploy a bunch of small cells there, blanket that town with B41 small cells, outdoor and indoor in enterprise and government buildings, problem solved.

 

A macro-level B26 deployment wouldn't hurt either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny that one of their main points is the public safety issue and being unable to dial 911.  I don't think they know that when you dial 911 without service, other providers have to pick up that call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if local NIMBYs have delayed or prevented NV upgrades?  Does Malibu's permitting process actually allow upgrades to happen?  Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming this a repeater system...

 

And you can practically rest assured that it is a NIMBY problem.  For aesthetic, property value, and "health" reasons, people in Malibu do not want actual cell towers.  So, they get utility pole mounted microcells -- that cannot be Network Vision upgraded.  In some areas, such as Topanga Canyon, those microcells are a necessity, just not in Malibu proper along the PCH.

 

Boo hoo.  The Malibu residents cannot have their cake and eat it, too.

 

AJ

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint can jump the NIMBY's here.

 

Where some of you see crisis, I see opportunity. Sprint should go full Spark microcell through Malibu and get an example of how good they can do with small cell LightRadio deployment. The vendor, in this case Alcatel-Lucent, gets a win they can trumpet, and so does Sprint. Sprint can trumpet themselves as overcoming adversity and being environmentally responsible.

 

Make it an example microcell deployment and an example of what the new Sprint/SoftBank can do.

 

Since I'm assuming the other carriers have to hook in the same DAS, this is an opportunity for Sprint to win a clear victory rather than being retreating into the old bunker mentality.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...