Jump to content

phone charges Sprint cant explain


aride4ever

Recommended Posts

So I have a general question that perhap you have asked yourself.  Recently I was reviewing my bill and came across a $4.99 charge that had no explanation.  I called sprint and they said it was for GPS usage. This was a surprise as I get GPS etc in our family share package.  When I asked for further explanation I was told it was for premium features but couldn't tell me what premium ment.  After about 35 min of  support checking different sources no one could answer what the charge was for and removed it from the bill.  Now here's the interesting part,  the charge showed up the day after I made a 911 call. So my question is have any of you been charged a GPS usage fee when you have had to call 911?   I looked back at a bill from about a year ago and found a $7.99 charge the day after a 911 call was made.  Just in case your wondering why I have made 2x 911 calls recently  butt dialing...  :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the last time I heard about this it was on the Evo line of phones where they had that horrible Telenav GPS app. If I recall the Sprint Navigation premium feature part of the app (normally $4.99) was free on the simply everything plans. I wonder if you changed your plan and now are seeing charges for something that was rolled into the service before?

 

Edit: found a thread on the Sprint forums so I know I am not crazy https://community.sprint.com/baw/message/308182

Edited by cletus
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the last time I heard about this it was on the Evo line of phones where they had that horrible Telenav GPS app. If I recall the Sprint Navigation premium feature part of the app (normally $4.99) was free on the simply everything plans. I wonder if you changed your plan and now are seeing charges for something that was rolled into the service before?

 

Edit: found a thread on the Sprint forums so I know I am not crazy https://community.sprint.com/baw/message/308182

Actually, just visiting that website is grounds for a diagnosis of Crazy. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case your wondering why I have made 2x 911 calls recently  butt dialing...  :-)

 

But, but, but, blame your butt.  Why are you sitting on your phone?  And how does that accidentally dial 911?

 

Consider yourself lucky.  You could have been legally charged with reckless use of 911.  Instead, you were financially charged about $20 for your inattention.  That seems like a reasonable bargain.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, but, but, blame your butt.  Why are you sitting on your phone?  And how does that accidentally dial 911?

 

Consider yourself lucky.  You could have been legally charged with reckless use of 911.  Instead, you were financially charged about $20 for your inattention.  That seems like a reasonable bargain.

 

AJ

Now that you mention it, it could be a fee for calling when there is not an emergency. I thought you got ticket whenever that happened but depending on your locality they might just charge the number, Sprint would then pass it onto you in your bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a short code programed in to speed dial *9116179*  , the system would only interpret the 911 when it was pressed.  This was setup by a sprint employee and was supposed to access the TDD menu. It was not until I had my phone replaced under warranty that we discovered the programming error. That being said  yea I only got charged a small fee it still doesn't answer my question as to why Sprint didn't know what it was.  Benchase7  I had thought about that, I had recently added a phone to the plan and although that shouldn't have changed the plan per say it definitely could have been that premium charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • As far as I know it's ubiquitous. Ultimately the network decides if you should use VoNR vs VoLTE but pretty much anytime my phone is in standalone mode and I place a call, it goes over NR.   Yup, it was terrible. After a while, I just connected to the WiFi, and that worked fine at about 90Mbps. I get the feeling that rather than doing a "real" upgrade where they install new antennas, upgrade backhaul, etc., T-Mobile instead installed new radios onto the existing and already overloaded DAS and called it a day, which isn't enough. Compared to Yankee Stadium, where they actually went and deployed new antennas/radios for their n41 upgrade, and you're able to get upwards of 200Mbps at sold-out games, Arthur Ashe really is a joke. What's worse is that the folks in their NOC likely know this already, but no effort is being made to change that. I'm not asking for T-Mobile to deploy mmWave everywhere like Verizon but there is a real use case for it at stadiums.
    • Does anyone know how well implemented is VoNR in the 5 boroughs. Does anyone use it? I have an iPhone 15 Pro. Does anyone know if T-Mobile is still working on upgrading their network? It seems like the service has gone down. My phone struggles in parts of the Belt Pkwy, and data is slow. 
    • I come to the US Open men’s semifinals and finals every year, and I’ve never been able to use my T-Mobile phone successfully. Usually AT&T is the top performer—good to hear Verizon has upped their game. 
    • One sector down, two more to go — — — — —  I was at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open today and the good news is that there is an n25/41 DAS setup throughout USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. From the "boardwalk" to the outdoor concession area, to inside the stadium; you connect to standalone n41 and n25 everywhere via oDAS and iDAS. The bad news is that in the actual stadium it's beyond useless. While I saw strong coverage as indicated by signal bars and I was able to make calls and send texts, there was no data throughput at all. Running a speed test failed 9 out of 10 times. The only time I got a speed test to work was by switching to LTE funnily enough or by using NSA 5G where the test would initiate via LTE and then n41 would kick in giving me ~20Mbps. T-Mobile has so much traffic on their 5G network that now n41 gets bogged down before LTE. That was a first for me! In the stadium in the same area Verizon got 1.2Gbps on mmWave and LTE kept timing out when trying to test it. My Boost line on AT&T got upwards of 150Mbps on C-band and I know they have mmWave deployed as I saw their Nokia mmWave antennas deployed but I was unable to test it. In the outdoor concession area T-Mobile performed well getting over 150Mbps on n41. AT&T in these areas saw over 250Mbps on C-band and I didn't get the opportunity to test Verizon there. It just seems like 140MHz n41 is not enough capacity for the amount of people inside the stadium. Hopefully T-Mobile is considering deploying n258 to all of these stadiums since they now own that mmWave nationwide. It'd make a world of difference in terms of capacity at these venues. Bonus Pics: Verizon and AT&T mmWave Hidden carrier neutral DAS: 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...