Jump to content

Netgear Mingle 778S (Virgin Mobile)


iansltx

Recommended Posts

Yep, I have yet another hotspot as part of my collection.

 

The Mingle appears to be the Zing/771S, but with no touch screen and cheaper materials; there are a few info screens that you access on-device by pressing the power button. The web UI is pretty much the same as the Zing's, and the dual antenna jacks are still there.

 

Wired tethering on my mac complained of an outdated driver, but after a reboot connected anyway, netting me 16M down, 6M up at my apartment. I'm headed out to near a confirmed TDD-LTE site to check out top speeds (and burn through my 250MB of data).

 

Like the Mingle and the MiFi 500, there's only one WiFi antenna in the device, limiting peak connection speed to 72 Mbps, and real-world transfer speeds to a fraction of that.

 

The device was $99.99 + tax from Virgin Mobile's website. One of the more interesting plans I saw as a $120/6 month/6GB plan. Expensive per gigabyte, but a little less expensive per month than the standard $25/1.5GB plan. You're basically paying $65 to keep your data active for five more months than usual; $55 is what the 6GB one-month plan costs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I know what the girlfriend is getting for her birthday this summer. Her home is hanging off what could be one of the worst WISPs there is, the telco won't bring a DSLAM out, and Time Warner just gut laughs at us. Sprint/Virgin is pretty darn solid though for those essential uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I know what the girlfriend is getting for her birthday this summer. Her home is hanging off what could be one of the worst WISPs there is, the telco won't bring a DSLAM out, and Time Warner just gut laughs at us. Sprint/Virgin is pretty darn solid though for those essential uses.

 

Just keep in mind that Virgin's offerings are inferior to Sprint's price-wise, and you can get the home router with no contract. Though if you're on the 6GB plan with both services, it'll take ten months or so (maybe more with taxes on the Sprint side) for the lower up-front cost of Virgin to be offset by higher monthly fees.

 

Then there's the fact that 6GB of data isn't that much when you're connecting to a real computer. But if you're okay with that, the Mingle is an option.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I'm back from my field test( and lunch). Looks like rebooting the hotspot near a Band 41 site will get it to lock onto that site, though otherwise the hotspot will sit on Band 25 ad infinitum. Now I'm not completely sure that I was hitting a B41 site during the second part of my testing (the Mingle's info screens are less descriptive than the Zing's), but I did hit ~23 Mbps down, ~8 Mbps up in an area where B25 should be pretty heavily used, and I know there's a B41 site very close by.

 

I also connected to a B41 site in a B25 coverage hole and got mediocre speeds (8-9 Mbps). Probably the site's fault though there. The device was showing full bars after a reboot (vs. almost no signal before). Interestingly, my Karma hotspot delivered 12-13 Mbps off of the same site (Karma's firmware is better than the stock Clearwire FW, where I couldn't get past about 8.6 Mbps a year or two ago).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just keep in mind that Virgin's offerings are inferior to Sprint's price-wise, and you can get the home router with no contract. Though if you're on the 6GB plan with both services, it'll take ten months or so (maybe more with taxes on the Sprint side) for the lower up-front cost of Virgin to be offset by higher monthly fees.

 

Then there's the fact that 6GB of data isn't that much when you're connecting to a real computer. But if you're okay with that, the Mingle is an option.

This is an emergency backup connection. When the WISP dies we jump over to hotspot, but only really use it for IM, blackboard, email, etc. She buys the 6 month package usually around September and it lasts through most of the winter, which is when here main connection seems to really suffer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I also connected to a B41 site in a B25 coverage hole and got mediocre speeds (8-9 Mbps). Probably the site's fault though there. The device was showing full bars after a reboot (vs. almost no signal before). Interestingly, my Karma hotspot delivered 12-13 Mbps off of the same site (Karma's firmware is better than the stock Clearwire FW, where I couldn't get past about 8.6 Mbps a year or two ago).

Be aware that the B41 LTE may have had more users with new phones coming out while the WiMax have far less as the devices are replaced with ones that have B41 LTE.

 

The plans from FreedomPop may be a better option for that situation but since the WiMax network will only last until the end of 2015 then I understand in wanting to select the mingle which is future proof and no need to spend money on another device later on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
    • Yep, you can see the site was taken down between Aug 2022 and Apr 2023.
    • Verizon site at Woodbury Commons finally got C-band. I'm seeing upwards of 600Mbps there, a massive improvement over the <1Mbps I used to see. LTE is now at 10-20Mbps which is significantly better than before where speed tests would often fail. My only complaint is that C-band is super inconsistent. Not sure if it's a software issue but sometimes I'm connected to it and get the 600Mbps speeds previously mentioned and other times I connect and only see 15Mbps. Seems like whatever load balancing the network is trying to do is still shoving a ton of people to LTE, even in conditions where I have a strong C-band signal.  — — — — — You're absolutely right. The site on top of Bais Sarah Hall at 6101 16th Ave got decommissioned. Sad that they haven't installed a new site to fill in that coverage gap.  — — — — — In other news a carrier reached out to the board of my grandmother's building in Brooklyn about installing antennas on top of it so she called me today because she knows I map cell towers and she said a lot of people in her building, especially the folks on the upper floors, are worried about the health effects lol. I asked her if she knew what carrier it would be but she said she doesn't know. A quick glance at Cellmapper tells me it's either Dish or AT&T since Verizon and T-Mobile both have sites within a two block radius of her building but AT&T barely builds new sites so I'm leaning Dish. They're asking for a 25-year lease with an option to renegotiate the lease after 10-years. The board of her co-op said that if they do it, maintenance fees will go down since they'll be offset by the rent that the carrier would be paying them. She said she already voted in favor of it but she thinks that a lot of the older people in her building are against it.
    • Galaxy S7 FE most certainly doesn't have the same level of NR CA (if at all), it also looks like it doesn't have SA NR, so it's is inherently going to be much slower since most of the spectrum is now focused on NR rather than LTE. It's likely the same generation radio as the S21 (or maybe S20). Having trouble finding which it would be.
    • T-Mobile seems to be paying close attention to how much of B2 they refarm for NR, as on this trip down to South Padre Island I saw both 20x20 n25 and 20x20 B2 (but not both simultaneously) at various points on the trip. At South Padre itself, seems like someone else has 2.5 GHz licensed so the n41 setup here is 20+80 MHz. Speeds are still decent, but VZW has 100+60 MHz n77 live (and AT&T has some 80+40).
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...