The state of LTE in the U.S.: How the carriers’ 4G networks stack up

[S4GRU]

How can I dispute what I've never used? I've only managed to used Band 25 LTE in the last week before returning the Moto X. The low latency (~80ms) was impressive, but the throughput is depressingly low, averaging around 4Mbps, despite the low number of Sprint subscribers in the area. I also had some difficulty maintaining a connection, even in a strong area, but I'm not sure if that was a problem with the Moto X.

 

I am hopeful that if Band 41 service were to launch here, the speeds would be raised to >15Mbps (meeting or exceeding T-Mobile's HSPA+21 average speed).

 

And seriously, why the heck are you mad at me?

 

Because you are trolling my site and you are one sided in your arguments.  You give Tmo passes.  Like how long it took them to bring WCDMA to your rural corner of Mississippi after they started to deploy it, but not give credit for Sprint bringing LTE to your area a short time after they start deploying it.  Too much coverage of Sprint is not done fairly, and lately you are an example of that.  It's disappointing.

 

Robert

[lilotimz]

I think that's enough advertisements and views for that pathetic article and the "discussion" it has spawned...