Jump to content

Has anyone looked into Sprint's Market of New York City?


Recommended Posts

Septi-band (850/900/AWS/1900/2600/3500) or bust! :tu:

 

Are you talking about ISM 900 (902-928 MHz) or EGSM band (880-915 / 925-960 MHz)? And when you say "3600", you're referring to 3.4-3.6 GHz band or the 3.6-3.8 GHz band?

.

 

Yes ISN and I'm talking specifically about 3.6 since that's what I have a licence for.

-Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

 

Yes ISN and I'm talking specifically about 3.6 since that's what I have a licence for.

-Will

Well, there's no LTE band for ISM 900. And of course, only LTE TDD could run on it. No one particularly wants to define an ISM 900 band for LTE, given how complex it is to use for such a network...

 

There's a band that covers 3.6-3.8GHz, which is Band 43.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there's no LTE band for ISM 900. And of course, only LTE TDD could run on it. No one particularly wants to define an ISM 900 band for LTE, given how complex it is to use for such a network... There's a band that covers 3.6-3.8GHz, which is Band 43.

I have been using 900 for testing with no I'll effects on 10 & 20 MHz TDD setups. I dont care what it is classified as, it works for high speed mobile broadband.

-Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been using 900 for testing with no I'll effects on 10 & 20 MHz TDD setups. I dont care what it is classified as, it works for high speed mobile broadband.

-Will

Well, if there're no ill effects, then my next question is, how are you providing wireless broadband service over it? Are you using LTE, WiMAX, or something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How well does that work? I've heard quite a few stories and read a few journal papers about the tech, but I'd rather hear about some empirical results...

 

From preliminary results, quite nicely sans a few bumps.  I should note that these hiccups are from lack of adjacent cells to continue on with cell transitioning.  As the network grows so does the depth of the testing.   I am going to forgo spilling all the marbles as I already have spoken of the bands I will use, but the ability to maintain a simultaneous connection to 2 or more serving cells [antenna panel] has proven to be a real winner in terms of throughput. 

My highest MSSTDMA test yielded just over 91mbps on 2 separate 10mhz TDD channels. I think what should be most noted about my variances to MSSTDMA is that it combines network architecture aggregation & device aggregation & due to spectral recycling (depending on antenna layout) you can effectively cover more physical area with high-speed broadband.  MSS- is just a build on to the old TDMA protocol & adds multiple streams of connectivity.

 

Someone mentioned combining with Sprint to use all of 896-928 for MSS wideband LTE and VOLTE.  I am not sure how that would play out but certainly VOIP has been trialed over TDMA before.

-Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From preliminary results, quite nicely sans a few bumps.  I should note that these hiccups are from lack of adjacent cells to continue on with cell transitioning.  As the network grows so does the depth of the testing.   I am going to forgo spilling all the marbles as I already have spoken of the bands I will use, but the ability to maintain a simultaneous connection to 2 or more serving cells [antenna panel] has proven to be a real winner in terms of throughput. 

My highest MSSTDMA test yielded just over 91mbps on 2 separate 10mhz TDD channels. I think what should be most noted about my variances to MSSTDMA is that it combines network architecture aggregation & device aggregation & due to spectral recycling (depending on antenna layout) you can effectively cover more physical area with high-speed broadband.  MSS- is just a build on to the old TDMA protocol & adds multiple streams of connectivity.

 

Someone mentioned combining with Sprint to use all of 896-928 for MSS wideband LTE and VOLTE.  I am not sure how that would play out but certainly VOIP has been trialed over TDMA before.

-Will

 

I don't think the 896-928 MHz band has been FCC approved for wideband operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the 896-928 MHz band has been FCC approved for wideband operations.

Well, Sprint doesn't own the licenses between Cellular and ISM. Those are owned by Aircell (who does business as Gogo), used specifically for ATG operations.

 

As for ISM, the main issue isn't "wideband", but tolerance. The network technology must be very resilient against interference in order to be classified as an ISM-usable technology. That spectrum is shared with licensed and unlicensed users, and all must accept interference and adjust accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...