Inside a Sprint LTE cell site

[bmattox79]

Quote from comments"Instead, they are showing you a partial deployment which they are doing because true Network Vision was found to be too costly and too disruptive (according to Sprint, customers would experience outages for 3 - 14 days)"

Does this guy have any clue what he is talking about??

Edited June 13, 2013 by bmattox79

[Rawvega]

In a word, no.

[halcyoncmdr]

That PCWorld article was infinitely better than the Engadget one. Wow.

[ryry4ya]

That PCWorld article was infinitely better than the Engadget one. Wow.

 

that's because PCWorld read the Engadget article, lol then read S4gru, then wrote the good one with our findings...yup ill stick to that process.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

[Rawvega]

Except for the fact that they erroneously describe Sprint as the nation's fourth largest carrier, pretty good article by PCWorld.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

[ericdabbs]

Except for the fact that they erroneously describe Sprint as the nation's fourth largest carrier, pretty good article by PCWorld.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I was going to make a post about that inaccuracy but I let it slide.  Otherwise it was a good article by PCWorld.

[WiWavelength]

Hmm Found this article aswell

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2041624/on-site-at-a-sprint-cell-gear-shrinks-while-coverage-grows.html

 

but on pcworld with NO pics

 

Uh, no, "rage-grows"?  Look at the truncation of that URL.  For my own sanity, no way am I clicking on that link.

 

 

AJ

[Kaixor]

Uh, no, "rage-grows"? Look at the truncation of that URL. For my own sanity, no way am I clicking on that link.

 

 

AJ

 

Do it! You won't be disappointed