Jump to content

Decnet RF Phone


hescominsoon
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have a gnex and while i like the non-bloatware version of the phone the rf performance on this handset it horrid.  I only have a few months until i can get another phone( if i decide to renew contract) and i'm wondering which of the Andriods that sprint currently offers has good rf performance especially in low signal areas..my gnex needs about 33% more signal than other phones..:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a gnex and while i like the non-bloatware version of the phone the rf performance on this handset it horrid. I only have a few months until i can get another phone( if i decide to renew contract) and i'm wondering which of the Andriods that sprint currently offers has good rf performance especially in low signal areas..my gnex needs about 33% more signal than other phones..:)

 

I have found that the Galaxy Note 2 and LG Optimus G have the best RF performance in my usage and testing. I would say that the Galaxy S3 is also very good. I hear anecdotal reports that the GS4 is similar, but I have not experienced it myself.

 

The Motorola Photon Q is pretty good, but seems to have lots of little bugs about losing data connection that are annoying.

 

But probably the best phone I've ever tested is the Samsung Victory LTE. It is a non flagship phone, but works very well. The HTC EVO LTE should be avoided for those who desire/require top notch RF performance. I hear that the HTC One is much improved over the EVO, but probably not as good as the new Samsungs or LGs.

 

Just a couple years ago, Samsung and LG devices were the worst for RF performance and HTC was the best. So things can change from year to year and model to model. So we should probably avoid making any sweeping characterizations about OEM's and RF performance.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

In line with the original point of this thread...

 

Is anyone aware of any threads/sites that specifically compare RF performance for a given carrier's phones? I currently have the EVO 4G LTE, and as Robert indicated above the 4G performance is poor. At home, I'm lucky to get signal strength better than -100dBm (using SignalCheck Pro), with speeds very rarely exceeding 5Mbps down. I'm about 1.5 miles away from tower at home, and do not really foresee any significant network changes from Sprint any time soon. I'm due for an upgrade in March, and RF performance will be a major factor in deciding on a new phone. While I like HTC devices in general, I'm not wedded to them, and would certainly consider someone else if the RF performance is there. And as long as I've been with Sprint (and as generally happy as I've been with them), I'm not wedded to them, either. If I have to go to Verizon, or (God forbid) AT&T for decent coverage at home, I will.

 

I know that Sensorly shows local signal strength for the various carriers, but I'm specifically looking for *radio* performance for different handsets.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In line with the original point of this thread...

 

Is anyone aware of any threads/sites that specifically compare RF performance for a given carrier's phones? I currently have the EVO 4G LTE, and as Robert indicated above the 4G performance is poor. At home, I'm lucky to get signal strength better than -100dBm (using SignalCheck Pro), with speeds very rarely exceeding 5Mbps down. I'm about 1.5 miles away from tower at home, and do not really foresee any significant network changes from Sprint any time soon. I'm due for an upgrade in March, and RF performance will be a major factor in deciding on a new phone. While I like HTC devices in general, I'm not wedded to them, and would certainly consider someone else if the RF performance is there. And as long as I've been with Sprint (and as generally happy as I've been with them), I'm not wedded to them, either. If I have to go to Verizon, or (God forbid) AT&T for decent coverage at home, I will.

 

I know that Sensorly shows local signal strength for the various carriers, but I'm specifically looking for *radio* performance for different handsets.

 

Thanks in advance

No one does this. The resources it takes to do a fair and scientific test just make this not feasible. S4GRU tried to do this early on. And we came up with some very useful and meaningful data. But to be conclusive, scientific and helpful was just not possible. To be wrong or provide incomplete data on something like this would be journalism malpractice. And why we stopped short of doing it.

 

I don't see anyone else doing this for the same reasons. The best you can do now is research FCC OET EIRP numbers to use as a general indicator and customer feedback. We have never seen a device have strong ERP numbers end up being a weak performer. And we've never seen a weak ERP device end up being a strong performer. Typically if the FCC tests are off, it's only by one rung. Sometimes a strong tester ends up being just good. Or a weak tester ends up being fair.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert/AJ

 

Thanks for your thoughts, guys.

 

Bearing in mind that those are best-case results I posted above (typically more like -115 to -120 dBm and 2.5 to 3.0 Mbps down, which is still better than my home DSL), I was hoping for better in the future. In particular a more stable connection; there are quite a few times when the LTE won't connect at all, and the 3G here is horrendous.

 

Just thinking about the future - not much else to do with the weather like it is here today  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Or, more simply, have a physical SIM that I can just move from one device to another.  Problem [already] solved.  Carrier doesn't have to be involved at any point in the process. I'll be among many (I'm sure) who will be glad to know if you see it.  Here in the DC area, Dish hasn't really done much yet.  I think I've seen some Dish gear around Richmond, but nothing here. - Trip
    • I like VICE.  They actually report on news no one else is willing to report. A lot of the places they go no sane person would want to be there.  They put their life on the line in many cases to get a story. From stories about the avocado wars in Mexico, being in the front lines against ISIS and Ukraine, to being embedded with terrorist organizations.   FAA might have some conspiracy 5G nut on their team or something.  At work ever year we have some one come in and say "hey, can you turn off the WIFI in my room? I don't want its radiation".  It doesn't make sense and their reasoning is always uneducated conspiracy. I can see someone coming into my office and acting crazy over C band disregarding everything else.
    • I think on esims it depends on how they implement it. If you can freely activate them on one phone while having it loaded on many that would be great.   I will let you know when I see Boost Mobile native 5g live here. So far no sign of even the plmn being active which I figure will be my first indicator. I look at changing networks with the TNX Sim and seem to get a full list of all carriers and their alternate plmns.
    • This is a result of the change I mentioned above, sparked by @PedroDaGr8 trying to log AT&T cells with a non-AT&T SIM that was reporting "out of service" but still capturing cell info. For the moment (subject to change as I keep testing and getting feedback), the "Connecting to" prefix will disappear when you connect in a scenario like that. I may adjust it to show a special prefix like "Limited LTE" or "No Data LTE" to make it more clear what is going on, but I also need to make sure that's only appearing at the proper times. When you were seeing just "LTE" in your screenshots, was there anything unusual about your connection? I see the app indicated you couldn't make calls; could you transfer data? Can you send a diagnostic report next time you see that?   I'm seeing this more frequently, unfortunately -- it has something to do with Android's power saving efforts I believe. Was the app in the foreground when it happened? When the screen updates, the notification and home screen widget are also updated -- but as seen with the widget for the past couple of years, Android doesn't always execute the update. I'm constantly trying to find ways around these limitations, since the app is useless if it's displaying stale data.
    • Bleh, hope not.  The eSIM is a huge step backwards to the bad old days and I have no desire to encourage their use. But in any event, maybe I should get Boost service, then, if people are already seeing it.  I can use it for AT&T until Dish native gear goes live in this area.  Have to ponder that a bit. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...