Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

I got LTE for a brief moment at the Sleep Train Arena. My brother said he gets a constant LTE signal off of Club Center in North Natomas. Is July still a possible switch date?

 

I can tell you that a minor cluster centered around around the sacramento international airport was fired up about a week ago. 

 

PZ4xywl.png

 

They might get Rancho Cordova cluster fired up sometime this month as I saw lots of upgraded sites in my little trip out to middle of nowhere RC this weekend but absolutely do not see City of Sacramento or unincorporated county (Arden / Fair Oaks / Orangeville -> CItrus Heights / Roseville / Folsom) being fired up this month or next month unless they kick it into high gear.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you that a minor cluster centered around around the sacramento international airport was fired up about a week ago. 

 

 

 

They might get Rancho Cordova cluster fired up sometime this month as I saw lots of upgraded sites in my little trip out to middle of nowhere RC this weekend but absolutely do not see City of Sacramento or unincorporated county (Arden / Fair Oaks / Orangeville -> CItrus Heights / Roseville / Folsom) being fired up this month or next month unless they kick it into high gear.

Middle of nowhere...I represent that!

 

Errr....

 

Yeah, still hoping. The data is awful out there. If I see it pop up, you will be the first to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Elk Grove gets LTE cluster launched/upgraded; will that include 800mhz?

 

When might that happen?

 

There is no LTE cluster launch. Cluster launches are for Network Vision 3G which forms the framework for implementation of LTE services which requires eCSFB which is only available on Samsung NV equipment. 

 

LTE sites get integrated one by one as backhaul is delivered by whoever is contracted just like how the cell site by the intersection of Bradshaw & Laguna was 4G integrated / accepted in the last report by Robert. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw some tower work being done today at the corner of 16th and C street in midtown Sacramento. If they're out again in the morning I'll snap some pictures to see if it's a sprint tower or not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw some tower work being done today at the corner of 16th and C street in midtown Sacramento. If they're out again in the morning I'll snap some pictures to see if it's a sprint tower or not.

 

I would rate the probability as very high so take pictures regardless if you can!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower on bell avenue and Astoria street has had it's equipment up for about 2 months now. All cabinets and everything have been added and swapped, and it looks like it has sprint spark gear. Is there an eta for when it will get activated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower on bell avenue and Astoria street has had it's equipment up for about 2 months now. All cabinets and everything have been added and swapped, and it looks like it has sprint spark gear. Is there an eta for when it will get activated?

 

Pictures. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.

 

Top is Verizon and bottom of clear Huawei wimax.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

WiMAX: isn't that now Sprint and just awaiting the equipment to get upgraded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiMAX: isn't that now Sprint and just awaiting the equipment to get upgraded?

Yes but it's not broadcasting any b41 last I checked.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called Sprint last week because I was having issues with poor call quality, go figure. The rep offered information regarding 5 towers in my immediate area being turned on beginning in July and the one I connect to 73% of the time set for Aug - I didn't ask what year, just took it with a grain of salt. If it happens great, if not, meh…

 

 

 

Sent using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a new tool employees have which should be relatively accurate. Certainly more so than in the past where it was always "the next 6 months"    My understanding is that on some towers, they add a month to the live date because they allow a month for optimization

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...