Jump to content

What happened to SON in LTE?


bigsnake49

Recommended Posts

I was reading this article in

 

http://www.accedian....s/lte-backhaul/

 

When you start digging into LTE, you find it’s a pretty amazing technology – not just the speeds and feeds, but the way it was thought out from the bottom up. With technology migration always a painful problem for operators, LTE was designed to simplify deployment, maintenance and reduce operating costs with the concept of Self Organizing Networks (SONs) running over a flat IP infrastructure. Base stations are much more sophisticated than in 3G and other wireless models: they are responsible for managing their radios, optimizing service quality, discovering neighboring cells, and connecting themselves to the backhaul network.

But perhaps the most important change in LTE base stations (or “evolved Node Bs”as they are known), is their responsibility for managing the service itself. Where 2G and 3G networks rely on centralized radio network and base station controllers (RNC/BNC), LTE goes without: each tower communicates with its nearest peers to hand-off users as they roam from cell to cell. Both control plane (roaming and call control) and user data traffic pass directly between towers, connected in a mesh-style backhaul network. This distributed networking and intelligence can reduce latency and free core capacity by sending data directly to its destination without passing through a centralized aggregation point.

 

........

 

So what happened to the mesh nature of LTE networks now that they have to go through centralized switching architectures?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If nothing else, this SON...er, I mean Son...is big into LTE...

 

masayoshi-son.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, yeah, I forgot abt Masayoshi Son :P . Good one, AJ!

 

If this guy has a lot of money, Do you think he might just want to fix that tooth of his as he smiles, let alone build out a LTE network?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If this guy has a lot of money, Do you think he might just want to fix that tooth of his as he smiles, let alone build out a LTE network?

 

Better to take a byte out of AT&T and Verizon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what happened to the mesh nature of LTE networks now that they have to go through centralized switching architectures?

 

I am not an RF engineer (though I play one at S4GRU). But if I were an RF engineer, I would do anything that I could to downplay Self Organizing Networks because they have the potential to put me out of a job.

 

It is not far fetched to imagine base stations that could dynamically allocate carriers/subcarriers and coordinate power levels with no human intervention, just a little bit of assistance from GPS and "the cloud." Contractors could install a base station, plug it in, and after the base station self gathered some info about other base stations nearby, it would be ready to roll. Effectively, this is what the Airave/Airvana already do.

 

RF engineering would not be rendered obsolete. There still would be some RF planning and drive testing to do. But SON would reduce the need for RF engineering, could make cellular network construction far more "plug and play."

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Here's the spectrum breakdown by band. There's some 2.5 in there as well. The remaining spectrum is definitely enough to keep running FWA on while finding a buyer, and since the towers aren't conveying with the subs and spectrum there's nothing stopping USCellular from competing with T-Mobile on FWA until Verizon or AT&T decide the spectrum is valuable enough to take off TDS's hands. If they go that route, I wouldn't be surprised if FWA gets rebranded under TDS.
    • Transaction Details and Financial Profile T-Mobile will pay approximately $4.4 billion for the assets being acquired from UScellular in the transaction in a combination of cash and up to $2.0 billion of debt to be assumed by T-Mobile through an exchange offer to be made to certain UScellular debtholders prior to closing. To the extent any debtholders do not participate in the exchange, their bonds will continue as obligations of UScellular and the cash portion of the purchase price will be correspondingly increased. Following the closing of the transaction, UScellular will retain ownership of its other spectrum as well as its towers, with T-Mobile entering into a long-term arrangement to lease space on at least 2,100 additional towers being retained. T-Mobile does not expect the transaction to impact the company’s 2024 guidance or 2024 authorized shareholder return program. T-Mobile expects this transaction will yield approximately $1.0 billion in effective total opex and capex annual run rate cost synergies upon integration, with total cost to achieve the integration currently estimated at between $2.2 billion to $2.6 billion. The company plans to reinvest a portion of synergies toward enhancing consumer choice, quality and competition in the wireless industry. The transaction, which is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and receipt of certain regulatory approvals, is expected to close in mid-2025.
    • The way I heard it, these were for sites that T-Mobile would not be keeping, and presumably is how they would handle decommissioning the equipment from them.  This would presumably happen because they're already on the tower or on an adjacent tower.  For example, in Keysville, VA, T-Mobile is on a tower directly adjacent to the existing US Cellular-owned tower. https://maps.app.goo.gl/kefNy451QXYFSqi5A T-Mobile at left; at right is the US Cellular-owned tower with both US Cellular and Verizon gear on it. - Trip
    • My gut opinion is they are waiting for technology improvements. C-band is seeing some of those emerge now which will extend its useful range and carrying capacity.  Given it current short range, 24GHz is best for places where people are seated in sizeable numbers, although I would not rule out business pico cells. Of course, Verizon is using mmWave small cells quite well for FWA by placing them outside large apartment buildings that only allow one ISP with outrageous charges. UScellular and some Verizon have been using it to do the job of microwave links to preserve licences (4 needed per county).
    • Looks like T-Mobile is consolidating around 24GHz for mmWave. Curious to know what their plans are for that. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...